From: krw on
On Tue, 25 May 2010 10:38:39 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 25 May 2010 10:28:42 -0700, John Larkin
><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Most cool:
>>
>>http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/NSI45020-D.PDF
>>
>>I've been wanting constant-current ICs for years. They are finally
>>starting to happen.
>>
>>This is 51 cents, q1.
>>
>>John
>
>Fig 2 is pretty gross. Lousy headroom design. Sheeesh!

What's that negative resistance all about?
From: Phil Hobbs on
On 5/25/2010 6:56 PM, John Larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 18:33:55 -0400, Phil Hobbs
> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
>> On 5/25/2010 1:38 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 May 2010 10:28:42 -0700, John Larkin
>>> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Most cool:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/NSI45020-D.PDF
>>>>
>>>> I've been wanting constant-current ICs for years. They are finally
>>>> starting to happen.
>>>>
>>>> This is 51 cents, q1.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>
>>> Fig 2 is pretty gross. Lousy headroom design. Sheeesh!
>>>
>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>
>> Figure 5 is what has me worried. A 15% current decrease occurs over
>> seconds.
>>
>> Great idea, no cigar for the implementation. Still, it's a lot cheaper
>> than the LTC thing.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Phil Hobbs
>
> It would be good for gross stuff, like pushing current into a zener to
> power some opamps floating on a power rail. It could also be a
> protective current limiter.
>
> Laser-trimmed precise 2-terminal current limiters would be great, in
> the 1 mA ballpark. Or 3-terminal, programmable with one resistor.
>
> John
>

Agreed. OTOH you can do a lot with an LM317L and a resistor.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal
ElectroOptical Innovations
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
From: Phil Hobbs on
On 5/25/2010 6:53 PM, Jamie wrote:
> John Larkin wrote:
>
>> Most cool:
>>
>> http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/NSI45020-D.PDF
>>
>> I've been wanting constant-current ICs for years. They are finally
>> starting to happen.
>>
>> This is 51 cents, q1.
>>
>> John
>>
> http://www.centralsemi.com/product/cld/index.aspx
>
>
>
Those are fairly horrible below 10 volts. You're way better off with an
LM317L or LM334.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal
ElectroOptical Innovations
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
From: krw on
On Tue, 25 May 2010 15:56:28 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 25 May 2010 18:33:55 -0400, Phil Hobbs
><pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
>>On 5/25/2010 1:38 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 May 2010 10:28:42 -0700, John Larkin
>>> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Most cool:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/NSI45020-D.PDF
>>>>
>>>> I've been wanting constant-current ICs for years. They are finally
>>>> starting to happen.
>>>>
>>>> This is 51 cents, q1.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>
>>> Fig 2 is pretty gross. Lousy headroom design. Sheeesh!
>>>
>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>
>>Figure 5 is what has me worried. A 15% current decrease occurs over
>>seconds.
>>
>>Great idea, no cigar for the implementation. Still, it's a lot cheaper
>>than the LTC thing.
>>
>>Cheers
>>
>>Phil Hobbs
>
>It would be good for gross stuff, like pushing current into a zener to
>power some opamps floating on a power rail. It could also be a
>protective current limiter.

Noise?

>Laser-trimmed precise 2-terminal current limiters would be great, in
>the 1 mA ballpark. Or 3-terminal, programmable with one resistor.
>
>John
From: Joerg on
Jan Panteltje wrote:
> On a sunny day (Tue, 25 May 2010 10:28:42 -0700) it happened John Larkin
> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in
> <p22ov5d4ju2fn3pf69ttkvqru1s5aumsqe(a)4ax.com>:
>
>> Most cool:
>>
>> http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/NSI45020-D.PDF
>>
>> I've been wanting constant-current ICs for years. They are finally
>> starting to happen.
>>
>> This is 51 cents, q1.
>>
>> John
>
> These dat 20 mA is a bit high for LEDs used as indicator.
> I have some green ones now at 3.3V with 33k (!) in series,
> the LEDs drop 2.38 and 2.44 V, so that makes .92 and .86 V over
> the resistors, giving a current of about 28 uA, good visibiliy
> in bright room light, JUST not blinding when you look directly into it.
> ftp://panteltje.com/pub/low_current_LEDs_img_1964.jpg
> The blue one is on 10% PWM with 180 Ohm in series on 3.3 V.
> That current source product may not sell.
> Resistors are cheaper.
>

Digikey would not have over 37,000 (as in thousand) of these in stock if
they didn't sell.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.