Prev: OWA por HTTP?
Next: Can I prevent users from sharing their own calendar?
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] on 5 Jan 2010 18:23
There's no such thing as a front-end server. You would be installing three
roles, Mailbox, Client Access and Hub Transport. You can certainly install
the CA and HT roles separately from the MB, but for 50 users I don't think
there's any compelling reason to do it.
--
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
..

"CarlK" <nf(a)no.com> wrote in message
news:OXR%23A0ljKHA.2260(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Thanks, this is why I asked. One of the consultants talked about exchange
> 2010 with a front end server and the database on a backend server.
> interesting...
> My thought was to just put it(exchaneg 2010) all on 1 server but my boss
> wants us to use a low-end server for the front end and the high-end
> (already in house) server as the backend. This is only for a single
> site with about 50 users.
>
>
>
> "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <curspice(a)nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:utwfAdljKHA.1824(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> If you have just one mailbox server you don't get much benefit from a
>> separate front-end server, so I'd recommend that you just go with one
>> Exchange server. I assume you're asking about Exchange 2003 since
>> Exchange 2007 and later no longer have the notion of front-end server.
>> --
>> Ed Crowley MVP
>> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
>> .
>>
>> "CarlK" <nf(a)no.com> wrote in message
>> news:eV0H7YljKHA.2184(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> Sorry, I meant the same server which hosts our SQL, not in SQL.
>>>
>>> "Mark Arnold [MVP]" <mark(a)mvps.org> wrote in message
>>> news:8db7k5tmujd7a59o8t496md3mqeuu16fd7(a)4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:36:09 -0600, "CarlK" <nf(a)no.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi
>>>>>Do I need to buy 2 copies of exchange for setting up a front end and
>>>>>Back
>>>>>end server? We would like to plan on putting the store database on
>>>>>our SQL
>>>>>server and get by with a lower cost FE.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>Carl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You're going to put your Exchange databases on your SQL server? Good
>>>> luck with that.
>>>> You don't have to have two boxes necessarily. If you have a firewall
>>>> on the outside you could publish TCP443 and 25 to the box direct.
>>>> If you want a FE as well as a BE then you will need two licences. The
>>>> FE only needs to be Standard Edition. The BE will depend on what you
>>>> need.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

From: Mark Arnold [MVP] on 6 Jan 2010 07:54
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:15:40 -0600, "CarlK" <nf(a)no.com> wrote:

>Thanks, this is why I asked. One of the consultants talked about exchange
>2010 with a front end server and the database on a backend server.
>interesting...
>My thought was to just put it(exchaneg 2010) all on 1 server but my boss
>wants us to use a low-end server for the front end and the high-end (already
>in house) server as the backend. This is only for a single site with
>about 50 users.
>
Just get a separate box and install the HT, MB and CAS roles onto it.
Don't even consider putting the MB role onto your SQL box.
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: OWA por HTTP?
Next: Can I prevent users from sharing their own calendar?