Prev: OWA por HTTP?
Next: Can I prevent users from sharing their own calendar?
From: CarlK on 5 Jan 2010 15:36
Hi
Do I need to buy 2 copies of exchange for setting up a front end and Back
end server? We would like to plan on putting the store database on our SQL
server and get by with a lower cost FE.

Thanks

Carl



From: Mark Arnold [MVP] on 5 Jan 2010 16:25
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:36:09 -0600, "CarlK" <nf(a)no.com> wrote:

>Hi
>Do I need to buy 2 copies of exchange for setting up a front end and Back
>end server? We would like to plan on putting the store database on our SQL
>server and get by with a lower cost FE.
>
>Thanks
>
>Carl
>
>
You're going to put your Exchange databases on your SQL server? Good
luck with that.
You don't have to have two boxes necessarily. If you have a firewall
on the outside you could publish TCP443 and 25 to the box direct.
If you want a FE as well as a BE then you will need two licences. The
FE only needs to be Standard Edition. The BE will depend on what you
need.
From: CarlK on 5 Jan 2010 17:27
Sorry, I meant the same server which hosts our SQL, not in SQL.

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" <mark(a)mvps.org> wrote in message
news:8db7k5tmujd7a59o8t496md3mqeuu16fd7(a)4ax.com...
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:36:09 -0600, "CarlK" <nf(a)no.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi
>>Do I need to buy 2 copies of exchange for setting up a front end and Back
>>end server? We would like to plan on putting the store database on our
>>SQL
>>server and get by with a lower cost FE.
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Carl
>>
>>
> You're going to put your Exchange databases on your SQL server? Good
> luck with that.
> You don't have to have two boxes necessarily. If you have a firewall
> on the outside you could publish TCP443 and 25 to the box direct.
> If you want a FE as well as a BE then you will need two licences. The
> FE only needs to be Standard Edition. The BE will depend on what you
> need.


From: Ed Crowley [MVP] on 5 Jan 2010 17:34
If you have just one mailbox server you don't get much benefit from a
separate front-end server, so I'd recommend that you just go with one
Exchange server. I assume you're asking about Exchange 2003 since Exchange
2007 and later no longer have the notion of front-end server.
--
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
..

"CarlK" <nf(a)no.com> wrote in message
news:eV0H7YljKHA.2184(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Sorry, I meant the same server which hosts our SQL, not in SQL.
>
> "Mark Arnold [MVP]" <mark(a)mvps.org> wrote in message
> news:8db7k5tmujd7a59o8t496md3mqeuu16fd7(a)4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:36:09 -0600, "CarlK" <nf(a)no.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi
>>>Do I need to buy 2 copies of exchange for setting up a front end and Back
>>>end server? We would like to plan on putting the store database on our
>>>SQL
>>>server and get by with a lower cost FE.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>Carl
>>>
>>>
>> You're going to put your Exchange databases on your SQL server? Good
>> luck with that.
>> You don't have to have two boxes necessarily. If you have a firewall
>> on the outside you could publish TCP443 and 25 to the box direct.
>> If you want a FE as well as a BE then you will need two licences. The
>> FE only needs to be Standard Edition. The BE will depend on what you
>> need.
>
>

From: CarlK on 5 Jan 2010 18:15
Thanks, this is why I asked. One of the consultants talked about exchange
2010 with a front end server and the database on a backend server.
interesting...
My thought was to just put it(exchaneg 2010) all on 1 server but my boss
wants us to use a low-end server for the front end and the high-end (already
in house) server as the backend. This is only for a single site with
about 50 users.



"Ed Crowley [MVP]" <curspice(a)nospam.net> wrote in message
news:utwfAdljKHA.1824(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> If you have just one mailbox server you don't get much benefit from a
> separate front-end server, so I'd recommend that you just go with one
> Exchange server. I assume you're asking about Exchange 2003 since
> Exchange 2007 and later no longer have the notion of front-end server.
> --
> Ed Crowley MVP
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
> .
>
> "CarlK" <nf(a)no.com> wrote in message
> news:eV0H7YljKHA.2184(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Sorry, I meant the same server which hosts our SQL, not in SQL.
>>
>> "Mark Arnold [MVP]" <mark(a)mvps.org> wrote in message
>> news:8db7k5tmujd7a59o8t496md3mqeuu16fd7(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:36:09 -0600, "CarlK" <nf(a)no.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi
>>>>Do I need to buy 2 copies of exchange for setting up a front end and
>>>>Back
>>>>end server? We would like to plan on putting the store database on our
>>>>SQL
>>>>server and get by with a lower cost FE.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>
>>>>Carl
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You're going to put your Exchange databases on your SQL server? Good
>>> luck with that.
>>> You don't have to have two boxes necessarily. If you have a firewall
>>> on the outside you could publish TCP443 and 25 to the box direct.
>>> If you want a FE as well as a BE then you will need two licences. The
>>> FE only needs to be Standard Edition. The BE will depend on what you
>>> need.
>>
>>
>


 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: OWA por HTTP?
Next: Can I prevent users from sharing their own calendar?