From: Tarun on 5 May 2010 05:13 Please some one can help me with my Image Processing coursework its radix 2 representation of a 256x256 image in matlab ..i have to sumbit the coursework by this friday and i have exams next week...i am not that good in matlab and im having lot of trouble..if some one can help i please mail me on tarunjacob(a)gmail.com and i will send the details....i will be very thankfull...please help...
From: ImageAnalyst on 5 May 2010 06:20 I don't do private emails with this group, though others might. What sorts of hints do you need? You can go ahead and post them here. I never heard of a radix 2 representation of an image.
From: us on 5 May 2010 08:21 "Tarun " <tarunjacob(a)gmail.com> wrote in message <hrrcr2$6fk$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > Please some one can help me with my Image Processing coursework its radix 2 representation of a 256x256 image in matlab ..i have to sumbit the coursework by this friday and i have exams next week...i am not that good in matlab and im having lot of trouble..if some one can help i please mail me on tarunjacob(a)gmail.com and i will send the details....i will be very thankfull...please help... what have YOU done so far to solve YOUR particular problem... us
From: Walter Roberson on 5 May 2010 10:47 ImageAnalyst wrote: > I never heard of a radix 2 representation of an image. "radix 2" would be equivalent to "binary".
From: ImageAnalyst on 5 May 2010 10:57
On May 5, 10:47 am, Walter Roberson <rober...(a)hushmail.com> wrote: > ImageAnalyst wrote: > > I never heard of a radix 2 representation of an image. > > "radix 2" would be equivalent to "binary". ------------------------------------------------------- Yes but a binary image is not the same as, say, representing a pixel with gray level of 169 as 10101001 which is the binary representation of 169. All images are ultimately binary in that sense because they're numerical representations in a digital computer. And if you say binaryImage = grayImage > 42; you can't say that binary image is a radix 2 representation of gray image because it's not - it's derived from grayImage but it is not a representation of grayImage. So I'm still unclear as to what Tarun means. I guess we'll see if Tarun returns...... |