Prev: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #585 Correcting Math
Next: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 3rd attempt #590 Correcting Math
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 11 Apr 2010 02:01
Looks like no luck in this 2nd attempt, even though some progress. I
probably do not
have time for a 3rd attempt since I will end this book on 15 April.

I do have a constant to all observers and all frames of reference in
Euclidean geometry
as "pi" is circumference divided by diameter. Now I take Euclidean
geometry and break
the symmetry forming Elliptic unioned Hyperbolic geometry and here I
have the
equiangles of the golden rectangle logarithmic spiral with the sphere
meridians.

I seem not able to find a 10^-44 and 10^-36 for either log spiral or
meridian.

So I am going to take a different tack, that maybe successful before
15 April.

I have these four nailed:

(1) Pi = 22 subshells inside 7 shells for 22/7

(2) e = 19 occupied subshells in 7 shells for 19/7

(3) fine structure constant = 22 / (22/7)^7

(4) proton mass/electron mass = 6*(22/7)^5

Now I think I have the rest mass of the neutrino predicted using the
mean life of muon as

(5) 0.511 x 10^6 eV / 2.1 x 10^-6 sec is approx
0.24 eV/sec.

So I am wondering whether the speed of light is predicted by the mean
life of many
of the particles of physics such as the muon or pion or Lambda. Most
of them are
in the range of about 10^-8 to 10^-11 seconds

The trouble with the speed of light, is that there are no other speeds
in physics, in all
of physics that is of *intrinsic importance*. There is only one speed
in all of physics
that is intrinsic and that is of course the speed of light. All other
speeds are secondary.

If I had another speed that was intrinsic, I could set up a ratio like
that of proton mass
to electron mass and then find a derivation from the Atom Totality.
But physics has only
the speed of light as intrinsic.

So we know that the photon travels at the speed of light and has no
rest mass, while
the neutrino travels almost the speed of light with a 0.24 eV rest
mass.

Now let me make a trial-run here. If I take the proton with its 938
MeV and divided
it by the mean life of the muon 2.2 x 10^-6 sec I have 4 x 10^8 Mev/
sec.

What I am saying is that the exponents for mean life of these
particles are in the
range of what the speed of light is. Now if there is some way of
converting MeV to
meters.

Another case in point is the Neutron or the Proton whose MeV of 939 x
10^6 eV
and 938 x 10^6 eV have the exponent of the speed of light in terms of
meters/sec.
So is there a conversion of MeV to meters/sec that makes sense?

What I am doing here is noting the fact, the obvious fact that the
exponent of the
rest mass energies and the mean life of these elementary particles is
close to the
exponent of the speed of light. So there must be some intrinsic
physical meaning
as to why the speed of light and mean life and rest mass are so close
together.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #585 Correcting Math
Next: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 3rd attempt #590 Correcting Math