Prev: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #586 Correcting Math
Next: trying out an example Re: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 3rd attempt #591 Correcting Math
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 11 Apr 2010 23:27

Now in this method of strip packing, the volume of the sphere need not
necessarily be
a packing of the log-spiral, for the meridians can be packed into the
interior of a sphere.
And one can imagine a "solid packing" by hoses as meridians of
decreasing size to
solidly pack the interior. So either the Log-spiral can be used to
pack the interior or
decreasing sized meridians.

Now also, let me raise awareness that the log-spiral need be only 3
times longer in
length than a meridian. And then to obtain the 10^8 magnitude, I only
need the length
of the meridian about 10^4 meters and the number of meridians as 10^4
so that I have
a total length of the meridians as 10^8 meters. So in this manner, as
you may perceive
the argument is that I need only a 3X factor for either time or
distance in the Log -spiral
and then have the meridians come up with the other factor of 10^8. So
in this methodology
I need not come up with 10^44 with 10^36 for meters/sec, I can come up
with 3 and with
10^8.

P.S. It looks like I found the solution to the speed of light as a
geometrical affect of
the log spiral in conjunction with meridians. But I am still hopeful
that Physics has
a second important speed in all of Physics. And perhaps I am the only
and first person
to point out that Physics has only one intrinsic speed of note-- the
speed of light and that
all other speeds are "situational speeds and not fundamental."

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #586 Correcting Math
Next: trying out an example Re: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 3rd attempt #591 Correcting Math