deriving speed of light out of raw pure math Chapt 19 #207; ATOM TOTALITY
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Now scientists read your mind better than you can
Next: Holo TV was Re: Accessories was Re: Push pull was Re: GPS incyberspace was Re: Truefalsemaybe was Re: Commander was Re: Java was Re:AI Methodologies
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 28 Jun 2010 02:01 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudosphere http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tractrix Now if you look at those two figures from Wikipedia of Pseudosphere and Tractrix that I have to retrieve these numbers: 60,000 x 60,000/ 12,000 = 300,000 50,000 x 50,000 / 8,300 = 300,000 40,000 x 40,000/ 5,300 = 300,000 30,000 x 30,000/ 3,000 = 300,000 20,000 x 20,000 / 1,300 = 300,000 10,000 x 10,000 / 330 = 300,000 So what that means is I need a successive circumference of the pseudosphere poles to be 330, 1300, 3000, 5300, 8300, 12000, . . What that means is the representative pseudosphere nested inside the sphere must have its poles come popping out of the sphere and go a distance further. Now whether that distance further is where the surface area of the pseudosphere matches the surface area of the enclosing sphere is a question. I hope it does. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
From: spudnik on 28 Jun 2010 22:36
is this supposed to be a 2D analog of lightwaves, on the pseudosphere, or do you use the corpuscular approach? > 60,000 x 60,000/ 12,000 = 300,000 > 50,000 x 50,000 / 8,300 = 300,000 > 40,000 x 40,000/ 5,300 = 300,000 > 30,000 x 30,000/ 3,000 = 300,000 > 20,000 x 20,000 / 1,300 = 300,000 > 10,000 x 10,000 / 330 = 300,000 well, I see a pattern! --the last bailout of Wall Street: BP's Waxman's cap&trade! http://tarpley.net |