From: Archimedes Plutonium on


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> In the previous post I told how the speed of light in an Atom Totality
> is found from
> pure math considerations as the distance of longitude bands divided by
> a special
> portion of the polar log-spiral. This derivation is immune to any sort
> of units for the
> speed of light. And I said that since the Universe is never a vacuum
> and that space
> is highly elliptical and not Euclidean, that the old measurement of
> light speed at
> 3 x 10^8 m/sec is probably off by 4 to 5% off. And that the speed of
> light is exactly
> following the digits of pi. So more accurately the speed of light is
> 3.14159.. x 10^8 m/sec
>
> Now as for the electric charge given as 1.60 x 10^-19 C. It is easy to
> see that such
> is very close to a very famous number in mathematics, the number phi
> or commonly
> known as the golden-ratio as (1 + sqrt5)/2 and is 1.618..
>
> Now the remarkable thing about this number is that if you take 1 and
> divide it by
> 1.618 what you end up with is 0.618. And if you take 1 and divide it
> by
> 0.618 you end up with 1.618. So another name for this special number
> is perhap the
> log-fractal number because it seems to mirror image itself.
>
> So now if we look at the electric charge and assume that it is the phi
> number for its
> digits that a more accurate electric charge is 1.618.. x 10^-19 C.
>
> But the more important task is to render the electric charge into pure
> mathematical derivation,
> just as I have done for the speed of light as bands of longitude
> divided by a segment of the
> polar log spiral.
>
> I suspect the electric charge is derived from the log spiral on the
> sphere surface. And the hard part is to obtain that exponent and make
> it unit independent.
>

To derive the electric charge purely from math geometry, I am going to
have
to interpret what the "Coulomb unit is".

Wikipedia gives this as definition of Coulomb:
"One coulomb is the amount of electric charge transported in one
second by a steady current of one ampere.[3][4][5]"

That may appear to be horrifically daunting to interpret the Coulomb
as a geometry, but
I think it is rather easy, provided I make a careful assumption. I am
going to assume that
the electric charge is the light wave, or what Maxwell and Faraday
said was the
"disturbance in the electromagnetic field"

That is a reasonable assumption, that the light wave is the coulomb
unit of measure in
geometrical units.

So the speed of light is actually the band-meridians divided by the
representative log-spiral.

So the Coulomb unit should be a Euclidean cross section of this sphere
with band-meridians.

More later when I have it better worked out in my head.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies