From: Jim Thompson on
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:35:56 -0500, ehsjr <ehsjr(a)nospamverizon.net>
wrote:

>Jim Thompson wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:24:29 -0700, Jim Thompson
>> <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com/Snicker> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:08:49 -0500, ehsjr <ehsjr(a)nospamverizon.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:47:45 -0800,
>>>>>"JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:52:20 -0500, ehsjr <ehsjr(a)nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:53:45 -0500, ehsjr <ehsjr(a)nospamverizon.net>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Michael Robinson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Drawing it out will make it clear. The first schematic below
>>>>>>>>>>>is a "sanity check", just to make sure that the circuit
>>>>>>>>>>>you described is something like it:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>As I explained from the beginning, the votlage divider at the reference pin
>>>>>>>>>>is connected to the battery/alternator output, like this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> field
>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>> mosfet
>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>> vco batt
>>>>>>>>>> | |
>>>>>>>>>> +12v---[R]---+------+ |
>>>>>>>>>> | | |
>>>>>>>>>> __|__/ [C] [R]
>>>>>>>>>> / / \ | |
>>>>>>>>>> /___\----+-------+
>>>>>>>>>> | |
>>>>>>>>>> | [R]
>>>>>>>>>> | |
>>>>>>>>>>Gnd ----------+--------------+
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Can you see how it would regulate voltage?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Yes. I've seen the idea all along, just not sure what
>>>>>>>>>was connected to where. Doesn't change my earlier answer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Any variation in the battery
>>>>>>>>>>voltage will cause the cathode to pull the vco up or down, changing the duty
>>>>>>>>>>cycle of the mosfet. It's a big feedback loop that includes the alternator.
>>>>>>>>>>I want to know how the cap throws everything off.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Check the diagram I drew showing the 431 as an op amp
>>>>>>>>>& output xsistor, with an internal 2.5 V ref. The 431
>>>>>>>>>works as a comparator driving a transistor, and your cap
>>>>>>>>>feeds the output back into the op amp input, causing
>>>>>>>>>oscillation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Your TL431 will operate (turn on or off) in response to
>>>>>>>>>a voltage change at the battery. The current through
>>>>>>>>>R will suddenly change when the 431 switches on or off,
>>>>>>>>>changing the drop across R. *That* change will be fed
>>>>>>>>>back by the cap into the input of the 431 at the ref pin
>>>>>>>>>as a pulse, and the 431 will react to that pulse. That
>>>>>>>>>feedback path is causing your problem. You do not want
>>>>>>>>>*that* change (the change at the cathode of the TL431) to
>>>>>>>>>appear on the ref pin.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Ed
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>TL431's don't SWITCH. They're more akin to an OpAmp.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Strictly speaking, no, but for usage here, it's simplest to
>>>>>>>think of them switching. The switching is like what you see
>>>>>>>on a typical zener curve where V goes from sloped to flat
>>>>>>>when the zener avalanches and conducts in the reverse
>>>>>>>direction. So they can be thought of as on or off.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>EUWWW. According to the datasheet is supposed to be used as a
>>>>>>linear (read non-switching) device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Ed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>To do it correctly you want a FIXED FREQUENCY oscillator with variable
>>>>>>>>duty cycle. Have the TL431 vary the duty cycle.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I hate to have to keep repeating myself... a TL431 should be
>>>>>considered as an OpAmp with VOS = VREF and with an open collector
>>>>>output. Is that too complicated for some of you to grasp ?:-)
>>>>>
>>>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>>>
>>>>Yes, I think it is, for me. I think you see the implications
>>>>of that clearly, while for me it is likely less clear.
>>>>
>>>>This is what I see:
>>>>I look at the op amp input and see large gain, the output and see
>>>>large (vs op amp output) current capability with the need for a
>>>>load. I see the Vref input. In his circuit, I see the cap on
>>>>the output which can cause instability, and can only guess at the
>>>>load, but I assume it's small enough to draw a few mA. Whatever
>>>>else I should be considering, I'm missing.
>>>>
>>>>Ed
>>>>
>>>
>>>I'll draw up a pretty picture tomorrow... wine time right now ;-)
>>>
>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>
>>
>> Take a look at this...
>>
>> www.analog-innovations.com/SED/TL431_Equivalent.pdf
>>
>> The snag is that the OpAmp IS compensated for unity feedback, for
>> who-knows-what resistive and capacitive load.
>>
>> So some caution is advised. You can, for instance, apply the usual
>> feed-forward/feed-around schemes to isolate the load capacitance form
>> the feedback loop.
>>
>> I have, in the past, used these device as OpAmps, driving matched
>> photo-couplers, to get a quite linear _analog_ photo-link ;-)
>>
>> ...Jim Thompson
>
>Thanks!
>
>Ed

You are quite welcome!

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

Help save the environment!
Please dispose of socialism responsibly!
From: Jim Thompson on
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:32:12 -0800, Fred Abse
<excretatauris(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:

>On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:05:33 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>> Take a look at this...
>>
>> www.analog-innovations.com/SED/TL431_Equivalent.pdf
>
>Same as shown in the TI data sheet

Sheeeesh! I guess that must mean I'm right ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

Help save the environment!
Please dispose of socialism responsibly!
From: Michael A. Terrell on

Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:32:12 -0800, Fred Abse
> <excretatauris(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:05:33 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
> >
> >> Take a look at this...
> >>
> >> www.analog-innovations.com/SED/TL431_Equivalent.pdf
> >
> >Same as shown in the TI data sheet
>
> Sheeeesh! I guess that must mean I'm right ;-)



It was bound to happen, some time! ;-)


--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
From: JosephKK on
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:50:37 -0700, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com/Snicker> wrote:

>On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:36:07 -0800,
>"JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:57:06 -0500, ehsjr <ehsjr(a)nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>>JosephKK wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:52:20 -0500, ehsjr <ehsjr(a)nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>TL431's don't SWITCH. They're more akin to an OpAmp.
>>>>>
>>>>>Strictly speaking, no, but for usage here, it's simplest to
>>>>>think of them switching. The switching is like what you see
>>>>>on a typical zener curve where V goes from sloped to flat
>>>>>when the zener avalanches and conducts in the reverse
>>>>>direction. So they can be thought of as on or off.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> EUWWW. According to the datasheet is supposed to be used as a
>>>> linear (read non-switching) device.
>>>
>>> From the datasheet:
>>>"Active output circuitry provides a very sharp turn-on
>>>characteristic making these devices excellent replacements
>>>for Zener diodes..."
>>>
>>>Where do you see the datasheet indicating it "is supposed to
>>>be used as a linear (read non-switching) device" ?
>>>How do you define linear as non-switching?
>>>
>>>I'm sure you have something in mind here, but I'm not
>>>getting it. Vin vs Vout is anything but linear when the
>>>device is turned on. So you must have something different
>>>in mind. As to switching, the datasheet specifies a
>>>very sharp turn-on and refers to a zener. How does my
>>>description of that fail to capture the gist?
>>>
>>>Ed
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Ed
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>To do it correctly you want a FIXED FREQUENCY oscillator with variable
>>>>>>duty cycle. Have the TL431 vary the duty cycle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>
>>I thought i read something like walking back and forth around the
>>knee of the regulation curve. Did i?
>
>What "knee"? TL431's are quite sharp. Treat it as an OpAmp...
>drawing showing how sometime today.
>
> ...Jim Thompson

Please reread my question. Please answer it. Did or did not someone
discuss wobbling it around the corner of the knee?
From: Jim Thompson on
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 14:00:13 -0800,
"JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:50:37 -0700, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com/Snicker> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:36:07 -0800,
>>"JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:57:06 -0500, ehsjr <ehsjr(a)nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>JosephKK wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:52:20 -0500, ehsjr <ehsjr(a)nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>>
>>>><snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>TL431's don't SWITCH. They're more akin to an OpAmp.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Strictly speaking, no, but for usage here, it's simplest to
>>>>>>think of them switching. The switching is like what you see
>>>>>>on a typical zener curve where V goes from sloped to flat
>>>>>>when the zener avalanches and conducts in the reverse
>>>>>>direction. So they can be thought of as on or off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> EUWWW. According to the datasheet is supposed to be used as a
>>>>> linear (read non-switching) device.
>>>>
>>>> From the datasheet:
>>>>"Active output circuitry provides a very sharp turn-on
>>>>characteristic making these devices excellent replacements
>>>>for Zener diodes..."
>>>>
>>>>Where do you see the datasheet indicating it "is supposed to
>>>>be used as a linear (read non-switching) device" ?
>>>>How do you define linear as non-switching?
>>>>
>>>>I'm sure you have something in mind here, but I'm not
>>>>getting it. Vin vs Vout is anything but linear when the
>>>>device is turned on. So you must have something different
>>>>in mind. As to switching, the datasheet specifies a
>>>>very sharp turn-on and refers to a zener. How does my
>>>>description of that fail to capture the gist?
>>>>
>>>>Ed
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ed
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>To do it correctly you want a FIXED FREQUENCY oscillator with variable
>>>>>>>duty cycle. Have the TL431 vary the duty cycle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>>
>>>I thought i read something like walking back and forth around the
>>>knee of the regulation curve. Did i?
>>
>>What "knee"? TL431's are quite sharp. Treat it as an OpAmp...
>>drawing showing how sometime today.
>>
>> ...Jim Thompson
>
>Please reread my question. Please answer it. Did or did not someone
>discuss wobbling it around the corner of the knee?

Maybe you did. I don't remember it. It's dumb. That sort of
"solution" doesn't stick in my brain ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

No matter how bad things are Congress can always make things worse
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Prev: Wow! A DimBulb Six-Pack
Next: Simple isolated mosfet driver