From: Archimedes' Lever on
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 02:05:35 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote:

>to mean that soft ferrites didn't have a Curie
>temperature.

Bullshit.
From: Archimedes' Lever on
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:46:28 -0500, "amdx" <amdx(a)knology.net> wrote:

>
>"Yzordderrex" <powersupplyguy(a)netzero.net> wrote in message
>news:a9090b31-6b08-4114-ae8a-37c5eed33788(a)u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>> Does anyone know of ferrrite can be turned on a lathe?
>>
>> I have a short 1" long by 1" dia. rod ( i know, i know, a personal
>> problem) and I would like to have a grove machined into it to accept a
>> few turns of wire. there will then be a bobbin slipped over that with
>> the secondary on it.
>>
>> I suppose this might be done with some type of grinder as well.
>>
>> Just curious to know what machining options are available for ferrite.
>>
>> regards,
>> Bob
>>
> Maybe instead of all the grinding and since it is a rod with its incomplete
>magnetic path. Can you install your bobbin, wind your secondary and
>add the insulation amount of insulation needed and then put your primary
>on the outside? Or wind your primary on the ferrite and use a larger bobbin,
>( know limited sizes)
> Do you have a high voltage problem you're working around?
> Mike
>
I already posed this question.
From: Archimedes' Lever on
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:30:06 +1000, Grant <omg(a)grrr.id.au> wrote:

>On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:20:54 -0700 (PDT), MooseFET <kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote:
>
>>On Jun 12, 12:07 am, BlindBaby
>><BlindMelonChit...(a)wellnevergetthatonethealbumcover.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:11:04 -0700, John Larkin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>> >On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:41:57 -0700 (PDT), MooseFET
>>> ><kensm...(a)rahul.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> >>On Jun 11, 8:42 pm, Yzordderrex <powersupply...(a)netzero.net> wrote:
>>> >>> Does anyone know of ferrrite can be turned on a lathe?
>>>
>>> >>> I have a short 1" long by 1" dia. rod ( i know, i know, a personal
>>> >>> problem) and I would like to have a grove machined into it to accept a
>>> >>> few turns of wire. there will then be a bobbin slipped over that with
>>> >>> the secondary on it.
>>>
>>> >>> I suppose this might be done with some type of grinder as well.
>>>
>>> >>> Just curious to know what machining options are available for ferrite.
>>>
>>> >>Grinding is the way to go. If you want to cut something that
>>> >>you would normally do with a lathe in metal, consider a tool
>>> >>post mounted grinder. Watch the temperature rise.
>>>
>>> >Maybe a dremel with a diamond wheel?
>>>
>>> >John
>>>
>>> After the grooves get ground (any cutting attempt will result in
>>> fracture), you need to cover the rod with transformer tape to insulate it
>>> from your primary wire.
>>>
>>> If you make an open ended core transformer, it will be pretty leaky
>>> unless you use a closed loop core arrangement.
>>>
>>> You would probably be better off with a pot core.
>>>
>>> I would use a dremel tool and grinding or cutting (abrasive cutting)
>>> disc attached.
>>>
>>> If you are making a large groove for a single layer of larger wire the
>>> grooves will allow the wire profile to sit a bit lower.,
>>>
>>> If you are using fairly small primary wire, you do not need the grooves
>>> at all.
>>>
>>> Temperature rise? They are not magnets. There are no properties to
>>> lose via introduction of heat.
>>
>>The one partedness can be lost through the heat rise at the machined
>>point. They don't conduct heat well and neither does the grinder.
>>I stand by my suggestion that temperature rise be watched.
>
>I just spent some time with a high speed hobby drill, various grinding
>attachments and a then piece of ferrite, a figure eight buckle type they
>wind those mains filters on, the type with sprocket teeth on the coil
>former so the ferrite is one piece.
>
>Anyway, 150 grit diamond tool rips into the stuff, black dust everywhere,
>easy to fracture pieces off, very harsh if one applies too much pressure.
>
>The sanders and other grinders a bit more gentle, most gentle (but slow)
>was the thin cutoff wheel when use with light pressure and kept moving
>to avoid localised heating. If I tried too hard to grind one spot, the
>ferrite would fracture from the hot spot, through several mm of ferrite.
>
>Machining ferrite is easy, with a little practice to develop a feel
>for what is easy, and stuff that is dangerous in the sense of risking
>fracturing the job.
>
>Diamond tools would need to be a lot finer than 150 grit to lessen the
>impact and give a smoother finish -- easy to control with light pressure
>and rips out the material quickly.
>
>Interesting stuff to play with. And try different tool speeds, the
>abrasion rate doesn't necessarily go up with speed. Odd?
>
>Grant.

Ever seen a pot core pair with mirror polished mating faces?
They are abrasively finished.
From: BlindBaby on
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:35:16 -0500, John Fields
<jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:

>
>That is, since the subject of the thread is "ferrite machining?", one
>with a modicum of sense would infer that the heat referred to was
>generated purely by mechanical means and that the Curie temperature of
>the material, at that point was immaterial.


Jeez, I wish I could expound facts the way you do.
From: BlindBaby on
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:49:20 -0700 (PDT), mpm <mpmillard(a)aol.com> wrote:

>With no dog in this fight, I have to agree with Sloman.
>In technical writing, you cannot fault the reader for not
>understanding what the writer intended.

That's not what he did. He faulted him for the parts he failed to
read.

Like the TOPIC HEADER.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Prev: Heat effect on FR4?
Next: More PIC fun