ferrite machining?
in [Design]
|
Prev: Heat effect on FR4?
Next: More PIC fun
From: MooseFET on 12 Jun 2010 12:29 On Jun 12, 8:30 pm, Grant <o...(a)grrr.id.au> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:20:54 -0700 (PDT), MooseFET <kensm...(a)rahul.net> wrote: [...] > Anyway, 150 grit diamond tool rips into the stuff, black dust everywhere, > easy to fracture pieces off, very harsh if one applies too much pressure. The problem is mostly the local temperature rise. If you are careful, you can cut an O-ring groove into a rod core to seal the place where it goes through a wall. Fine work can be done but when making any sort of a groove a lot of care is needed.
From: John Fields on 12 Jun 2010 12:58 On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:59:01 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: --- Snipped irrelevancies... --- >And who did you consult to find out what someone with a modicum of >sense would have thought? --- Certainly not you!
From: John Fields on 12 Jun 2010 13:06 On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:02:20 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >On Jun 12, 5:11�pm, BlindBaby ><BlindMelonChit...(a)wellnevergetthatonethealbumcover.org> wrote: >> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:35:16 -0500, John Fields >> >> <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >> >> >That is, since the subject of the thread is "ferrite machining?", one >> >with a modicum of sense would infer that the heat referred to was >> >generated purely by mechanical means and that the Curie temperature of >> >the material, at that point was immaterial. >> >> � Jeez, I wish I could expound facts the way you do. > >Sadly, he does. --- Tsk, tsk, problems with English _and_ logic...
From: BlindBaby on 12 Jun 2010 13:16 On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:02:20 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >On Jun 12, 5:11�pm, BlindBaby ><BlindMelonChit...(a)wellnevergetthatonethealbumcover.org> wrote: >> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:35:16 -0500, John Fields >> >> <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >> >> >That is, since the subject of the thread is "ferrite machining?", one >> >with a modicum of sense would infer that the heat referred to was >> >generated purely by mechanical means and that the Curie temperature of >> >the material, at that point was immaterial. >> >> � Jeez, I wish I could expound facts the way you do. > >Sadly, he does. Sadly, you prove yet again that you are a sub-human, pathetic prick.
From: BlindBaby on 12 Jun 2010 13:16
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:03:31 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >On Jun 12, 5:47�pm, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:11:03 -0700, BlindBaby >> >> <BlindMelonChit...(a)wellnevergetthatonethealbumcover.org> wrote: >> >On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:35:16 -0500, John Fields >> ><jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >> >> >>That is, since the subject of the thread is "ferrite machining?", one >> >>with a modicum of sense would infer that the heat referred to was >> >>generated purely by mechanical means and that the Curie temperature of >> >>the material, at that point was immaterial. >> >> > �Jeez, I wish I could expound facts the way you do. >> >> --- >> Thank you, that's very kind. :-) > >But, granting that the admiration comes fron BlindBaby, not worth >much. Sadly, you prove yet again that you are a sub-human, pathetic prick. |