get your nookies: Belarus to repopulate Chernobyl Exclusion Zone
in [Physics]
|
From: spudnik on 6 Aug 2010 15:29 That panic-stricken reaction to the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear reactor mishap was a fatal error on the part of Soviet authorities, influenced in part by exaggerated recommendations coming from international radiation protection bodies, such as the International Commission on Radiological Protection and the International Atomic Energy Agency. A short-term evacuation of people from an area near the Chernobyl power station, for example from a town of Pripyat, situated 3 km from the burning reactor, was a reasonable precautionary measure in the developing crisis. But, as radiation dose rates decreased rapidly by orders of magnitude, there was no sense in keeping the inhabitants of Pripyat away from their homes, where now the radiation level is similar to that in the streets of Warsaw (Jaworowski 2010). http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2010/Chernobyl_repopulation.pdf thus: probably more invavsive species, yes, because of the C4 (?) pathway that grasses use e.g. however, plants & animals need unknown amounts of *all* of the 92 elements, and those are often lacking in various, degraded soils. NPK just doesn't hack it. > invasive species? thus: so, bp is against derivatives in CO2 "credits;" eh?... what does FOX News, say about them -- "we earn money, the oldfashioned way?" thus: so, there is no perfect vacuum, "out there," and metamaterials have adjustable indices of refraction? > > structures in which the propagation of light can be precisely controlled. thus: I haven't watched the boob toob in decades; for instance, I saw the second plane hit WTC2 in '07, because I happened to be some where, where there was *no* where, else, but to have a TV going 24/7/52, on Sept.11. thus: iff the LaRouchiacs wrote-up dowsing, it should be of interest, pro or con. for instance, see if you can find the article about Bienveniste's experiments with homeopathy, and "The Annoying Randi." thus: now, you know, why the fanatics never mention, or find out about, Singer's vitae; he did that metastudy, like, twenty years ago, although the amount of water is probably small, compared to Antarctica and Greenland; so his study is more important, thereby, vis-a-vu the hearsay nine-tenths figure. > Where is all this water? 90% of all glaciers melting produce a lot of > water, where did it go. When you find that water let me know. thus: darkmatter is just more effluvia of Einsteinmania, reifying his teeny math about gravity, ignoring the 99.99% of Universe that is plasma ... well, maybe a tenth, because a recent discovery is that dihyrdgen is much-more common than ionic hydrgen. but, you see, no vacuum for your theory to be employed in. ignore Kaluza's "stringtheory," if you like, but it wasn't him who used the metaphor, and the math still works, apparently (I'm not so good at that, either .-) > You're the one who is supposedly trying to relate gravity with > magnetism and electricity. They relate through dark matter thus: Al Gore: The Modern Cecil Rhodes In fact, when you look at it, you find out that companies that were founded in the tradition of Cecil Rhodes, are today heavily involved in weapons deals that certainly involve South Africa. And here we actually get a picture of the continued function of the policy of the British East India Company, the old colonizing policy, the role of the British Empire as it was founded more than 200 years ago. http://www.larouchepub.com/lym/2007/3435lym_africa.html thus: I agree, but he did start out with a good observation, iff and iff only because I made it, two, a long, long, long time, ago ... er, got it from Bucky!... so, how do you say that "counting is dimensional?..." do androids dream of dimensional sheep? --les ducs d'oil! http://tarpley.net --Light, A History! http://wlym.com
From: $27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto on 6 Aug 2010 17:05 On Aug 6, 3:29 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > That panic-stricken reaction to the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear reactor > mishap was a fatal error on the part of Soviet authorities, influenced > in part by exaggerated recommendations coming from international > radiation protection bodies, such as the International Commission on > Radiological Protection and the International Atomic Energy Agency. A > short-term evacuation of people from an area near the Chernobyl power > station, for example from a town of Pripyat, situated 3 km from the > burning reactor, was a reasonable precautionary measure in the > developing crisis. But, as radiation dose rates decreased rapidly by > orders of magnitude, there was no sense in keeping the inhabitants of > Pripyat away from their homes, where now the radiation level is > similar to that in the streets of Warsaw (Jaworowski 2010).http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2010/Chernobyl_repopul... > Oil spill over, AGW discredited, No big hurricans, Chenobyl exclusion zones repopulated because NO high incidences of cancer or other abnormalities found. Enviro-KOOKS must be SEETHING with anger!!! GOOD!!!
From: Ringer on 6 Aug 2010 18:28 "spudnik" <Space998(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:27b34ba4-ab11-4887-8ea8-0c195080249f(a)q16g2000prf.googlegroups.com... That panic-stricken reaction to the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear reactor mishap was a fatal error on the part of Soviet authorities, influenced in part by exaggerated recommendations coming from international radiation protection bodies, such as the International Commission on Radiological Protection and the International Atomic Energy Agency. A short-term evacuation of people from an area near the Chernobyl power station, for example from a town of Pripyat, situated 3 km from the burning reactor, was a reasonable precautionary measure in the developing crisis. But, as radiation dose rates decreased rapidly by orders of magnitude, there was no sense in keeping the inhabitants of Pripyat away from their homes, where now the radiation level is similar to that in the streets of Warsaw (Jaworowski 2010). http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2010/Chernobyl_repopulation.pdf thus: probably more invavsive species, yes, because of the C4 (?) pathway that grasses use e.g. however, plants & animals need unknown amounts of *all* of the 92 elements, and those are often lacking in various, degraded soils. NPK just doesn't hack it. > invasive species? thus: so, bp is against derivatives in CO2 "credits;" eh?... what does FOX News, say about them -- "we earn money, the oldfashioned way?" thus: so, there is no perfect vacuum, "out there," and metamaterials have adjustable indices of refraction? > > structures in which the propagation of light can be precisely > > controlled. thus: I haven't watched the boob toob in decades; for instance, I saw the second plane hit WTC2 in '07, because I happened to be some where, where there was *no* where, else, but to have a TV going 24/7/52, on Sept.11. thus: iff the LaRouchiacs wrote-up dowsing, it should be of interest, pro or con. for instance, see if you can find the article about Bienveniste's experiments with homeopathy, and "The Annoying Randi." thus: now, you know, why the fanatics never mention, or find out about, Singer's vitae; he did that metastudy, like, twenty years ago, although the amount of water is probably small, compared to Antarctica and Greenland; so his study is more important, thereby, vis-a-vu the hearsay nine-tenths figure. > Where is all this water? 90% of all glaciers melting produce a lot of > water, where did it go. When you find that water let me know. thus: darkmatter is just more effluvia of Einsteinmania, reifying his teeny math about gravity, ignoring the 99.99% of Universe that is plasma ... well, maybe a tenth, because a recent discovery is that dihyrdgen is much-more common than ionic hydrgen. but, you see, no vacuum for your theory to be employed in. ignore Kaluza's "stringtheory," if you like, but it wasn't him who used the metaphor, and the math still works, apparently (I'm not so good at that, either .-) > You're the one who is supposedly trying to relate gravity with > magnetism and electricity. They relate through dark matter thus: Al Gore: The Modern Cecil Rhodes In fact, when you look at it, you find out that companies that were founded in the tradition of Cecil Rhodes, are today heavily involved in weapons deals that certainly involve South Africa. And here we actually get a picture of the continued function of the policy of the British East India Company, the old colonizing policy, the role of the British Empire as it was founded more than 200 years ago. http://www.larouchepub.com/lym/2007/3435lym_africa.html thus: I agree, but he did start out with a good observation, iff and iff only because I made it, two, a long, long, long time, ago ... er, got it from Bucky!... so, how do you say that "counting is dimensional?..." do androids dream of dimensional sheep? --les ducs d'oil! http://tarpley.net --Light, A History! http://wlym.com Bullshit. Unlike you, I was around at the time. The west didn't even know something was happening until they detected radioactive elements in the wind coming over europe. One of the complaints was that the soviets didn't let the world know that chernobyl had melted down. The evacuation was because people were dying from massive radiation poisoning.
From: Sam Wormley on 7 Aug 2010 14:26 On 8/6/10 4:05 PM, $27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto wrote: > > ...AGW discredited... Hardly! http://edu-observatory.org/olli/Global_Climate_Change_Resources.html CO2 increase, Global Temperature increase, Sea Level increase, are all consistent with each other. Real impact is showing up in agriculture, ecosystems, weather patterns, shifting seasons and ice melting. The global data CLEARLY shows: Human contributed increase in green house gas CO2 http://www.globalchange.gov/HighResImages/1-Global-pg-13.jpg http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/10/16/0907094106 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091023163513.htm Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/images/global-surface-temp-trends.gif And accompanying Sea Level Rise http://www.wildwildweather.com/forecastblog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/700px-recent_sea_level_rise.png There are many sources of good data http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/ http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-monitoring/index.php Here's some data from Iowa State University http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/faculty/takle/presentations.html More from University of Iowa http://www.engineering.uiowa.edu/faculty-staff/profile-directory/cee/schnoor_j.php Franzen - The Chemistry and Physics of Global Climate Change http://hfranzen.org/ http://www.hfranzen.org/Global_Warming.pdf
From: Benj on 7 Aug 2010 14:40
On Aug 7, 2:26 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/6/10 4:05 PM, $27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto wrote: > > > > > ...AGW discredited... > > Hardly! > The global data CLEARLY shows: <Snip usual "Wormley" propaganda barf of faked and "spun" data that supposedly supports his ideas of massive taxation on all civilization...> Lies, lies, lies. |