For those who don't believe E=mc^2
in [Physics]
|
Prev: get your nookies: Belarus to repopulate Chernobyl Exclusion Zone
Next: 2010 Individual Taxation With H&R Block Taxcut 4e 2010 Pratt Kulsrud Test bank
From: Excognito on 6 Aug 2010 15:53 65th Birthday of Nuclear Warfare http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy
From: nuny on 6 Aug 2010 17:35 On Aug 6, 12:53 pm, Excognito <stuartbr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 65th Birthday of Nuclear Warfare > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy Good one; dead silence from the anti-Einstein fanatics. Mark L. Fergerson
From: BURT on 6 Aug 2010 18:04 On Aug 6, 2:35 pm, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 6, 12:53 pm, Excognito <stuartbr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > 65th Birthday of Nuclear Warfare > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy > > Good one; dead silence from the anti-Einstein fanatics. > > Mark L. Fergerson E=mc Squared did not realease energy. New energy can be created by aether in the universe.by the splitting atom. If the atom emitts energy all at once which particle radiates it? Mitch Raemsch
From: Sam Wormley on 7 Aug 2010 14:27 On 8/7/10 1:22 PM, bert wrote: > Eistein gave E=MC^2 I gave G=EMC^2 Einstein had the advantage over you, Herb, in that observations and experiments agree with relativity predictions, whereas your equation and theories are just nonsense. Oh yeah!
From: Benj on 7 Aug 2010 14:36
On Aug 7, 2:27 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/7/10 1:22 PM, bert wrote: > > > Eistein gave E=MC^2 I gave G=EMC^2 > > Einstein had the advantage over you, Herb, in that observations > and experiments agree with relativity predictions, whereas your > equation and theories are just nonsense. Oh yeah! Well, true, Sam, but then "TreBert" is "smarter than Einstein" and your aren't! |