From: Jackie on 14 May 2010 20:03 On 5/15/2010 01:59, Jackie wrote: I didn't answer your question *exactly*. The reason why you add "%path%" is that you need to include your own paths, and include whatever it was already.
From: Jackie on 14 May 2010 20:04 I mean what it was previously set.
From: Jackie on 14 May 2010 20:08 Can't answer properly and can't even write properly. I need some sleep now. Haha.
From: Erik Toussaint on 14 May 2010 20:20 On 15-5-2010 0:52, Uno wrote: > Why would a person put in %path% when he's setting the path:? As Jackie said, this is done to append a directory to the existing path, instead of completely replacing it. If you type: set path=%dir%\bin the path environment variable will now contain only that single directory. Anything it contained before is wiped. However, if you type: set path=%dir%\bin;%path% the path variable will now contain anything it did before, _plus_ the directory you added. > and what can you do about foldovers so as not to make them happen? I'm not sure what you mean by this. What context are you talking about? Erik.
From: Uno on 15 May 2010 16:04 On 5/14/2010 7:20 PM, Erik Toussaint wrote: > On 15-5-2010 0:52, Uno wrote: >> Why would a person put in %path% when he's setting the path:? > > As Jackie said, this is done to append a directory to the existing path, > instead of completely replacing it. > > If you type: > > set path=%dir%\bin > > the path environment variable will now contain only that single > directory. Anything it contained before is wiped. However, if you type: > > set path=%dir%\bin;%path% > > the path variable will now contain anything it did before, _plus_ the > directory you added. Gotcha. That makes sense. > > >> and what can you do about foldovers so as not to make them happen? > > I'm not sure what you mean by this. What context are you talking about? > What happens with these paths is that they get long enough for certain apps to add some form of a newline character thrown in there along the way when you post it on usenet and paste it into notebook. I would like a batch file to be idiot-proof, as that idiot will be me coming back at the same material 5-10 years from now, having forgotten the lessons of the day. Does does contemporary ms-dos scripting have a continuation character? -- Uno
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: an ms-dos reference Next: Obtain DRAWITEMSTRUCT assoc. with Button |