Prev: an ms-dos reference
Next: Obtain DRAWITEMSTRUCT assoc. with Button
From: Uno on 15 May 2010 16:10
On 5/14/2010 7:04 PM, Jackie wrote:
> I mean what it was previously set.

You're a funny person, Jackie. You seem to argue with yourself
sometimes. Honestly, you should be on facebook or even twitter, which
is even more frenetic. Come to think of it, you might be very good at
the technical side of facebooking.

A little quoting of context is usually a good thing when you want to
correct little details in an explanation.

I certainly appreciate that you care enough about my dos quandaries to
respond. Cheers,
--
Uno
From: Jackie on 16 May 2010 07:11
On 5/15/2010 22:10, Uno wrote:
> On 5/14/2010 7:04 PM, Jackie wrote:
>> I mean what it was previously set.
>
> You're a funny person, Jackie. You seem to argue with yourself
> sometimes. Honestly, you should be on facebook or even twitter, which is
> even more frenetic. Come to think of it, you might be very good at the
> technical side of facebooking.
>
> A little quoting of context is usually a good thing when you want to
> correct little details in an explanation.
>
> I certainly appreciate that you care enough about my dos quandaries to
> respond. Cheers,

I hope funny in a good way, then. :)
Just rephrased something I previously said, which I could have said
differently (in a better way). I assumed it would be clear what I was
referring to, because it was an addition to the post I wrote right
before that, so I'll try to make it more clear next time. Without a way
to edit my posts, and while it was past my bedtime, that's what I came
up with at that very moment.
I don't get paid anyways so please bear with some of it. :)
From: Erik Toussaint on 16 May 2010 09:28
On 15-5-2010 22:04, Uno wrote:
> Does does contemporary ms-dos scripting have a continuation character?

One minute on Google found me this:

http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-powershell/q-what-is-the-cmd-exe-line-continuation-character-.aspx

Erik.

From: Uno on 16 May 2010 17:49
On 5/16/2010 5:11 AM, Jackie wrote:
> On 5/15/2010 22:10, Uno wrote:
>> On 5/14/2010 7:04 PM, Jackie wrote:
>>> I mean what it was previously set.
>>
>> You're a funny person, Jackie. You seem to argue with yourself
>> sometimes. Honestly, you should be on facebook or even twitter, which is
>> even more frenetic. Come to think of it, you might be very good at the
>> technical side of facebooking.
>>
>> A little quoting of context is usually a good thing when you want to
>> correct little details in an explanation.
>>
>> I certainly appreciate that you care enough about my dos quandaries to
>> respond. Cheers,
>
> I hope funny in a good way, then. :)
> Just rephrased something I previously said, which I could have said
> differently (in a better way). I assumed it would be clear what I was
> referring to, because it was an addition to the post I wrote right
> before that, so I'll try to make it more clear next time. Without a way
> to edit my posts, and while it was past my bedtime, that's what I came
> up with at that very moment.
> I don't get paid anyways so please bear with some of it. :)


I meant good funny. :-)
--
Uno
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: an ms-dos reference
Next: Obtain DRAWITEMSTRUCT assoc. with Button