From: The Natural Philosopher on 20 Mar 2010 09:29 Geoff wrote: > On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:09:46 +0000, The Natural Philosopher > <tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > > spelling of invalid now correct ... > > Geoff :-) The only reason to not use entirely made up email addresses is that it allegedly puts a load on the roor servers of whatever domain you use serving requests for domains that don't exist. ..invalid is supposed to speedily return a null response without such overload. Not that DNS servers are really stressed..we used to run a couple of thousand domains on a half dead 386 with about 64M of RAM.. So its all pedantic bullshit really.
From: Geoff on 20 Mar 2010 09:51 On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:29:11 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >Geoff wrote: >> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:09:46 +0000, The Natural Philosopher >> <tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >> spelling of invalid now correct ... >> >> Geoff >:-) > >The only reason to not use entirely made up email addresses is that it >allegedly puts a load on the roor servers of whatever domain you use >serving requests for domains that don't exist. > >.invalid is supposed to speedily return a null response without such >overload. > >Not that DNS servers are really stressed..we used to run a couple of >thousand domains on a half dead 386 with about 64M of RAM.. > >So its all pedantic bullshit really. OK! Geoff
From: Dr_Kral on 20 Mar 2010 10:36 >>Why not use .invalid domain instead? > >I did and was told that this was wrong by Dr_Kal !! Geoff, I said that <geoff(a)invalid.com> was a VALID e-mail address and therefore you should not use it. Take a look at the home page of <invalid.com> The domain <invalid.invalid> does not exist at the pressent. Y.
From: The Natural Philosopher on 20 Mar 2010 15:03 Dr_Kral(a)nyc.rr.com.invalid wrote: >>> Why not use .invalid domain instead? >> I did and was told that this was wrong by Dr_Kal !! > > Geoff, > > I said that <geoff(a)invalid.com> was a VALID e-mail address and therefore > you should not use it. Take a look at the home page of <invalid.com> > > The domain <invalid.invalid> does not exist at the pressent. > > Y. > I think its guaranteed to *never* exist actually. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.invalid To the extent that a resolver can reject it without having to look it up. Anyone registering invalid.com, deserves all the traffic they get IMHO. can alwatys use disabled.com instead. ;-)
From: Daniel Weber on 20 Mar 2010 15:37
Am 20.03.2010 14:29, schrieb The Natural Philosopher: > So its all pedantic bullshit really. Not really, but the matter isn't DNS, the matter is that somebody [1] will receive bounces, when you use a faked/forged address, so you reduce your spam but increase somebody elses spam. But that is all off topic here. Bye, Daniel [1] The spammer usually won't use it own e-mail-address as sender. |