From: D Herring on 26 Apr 2010 16:03 On 04/26/2010 07:46 AM, o.jasper(a)gmail.com wrote: > Nah, both lispforum.com and reddit.com/r/lisp show that we can have it > spam free for free, without a newsreader. And not requiring a > newsreader makes it more accessible to newbies aswel. a) both of those are moderated b) each requires a separate account, and neither works with a newsreader c) noobs preferring web-based systems is a generational trend d) it would be nice if there were a clean way to aggregate the web forums -- aggregation was a prime motivation for usenet after all - Daniel
From: Pascal J. Bourguignon on 26 Apr 2010 19:16 D Herring <dherring(a)at.tentpost.dot.com> writes: > On 04/26/2010 07:46 AM, o.jasper(a)gmail.com wrote: >> Nah, both lispforum.com and reddit.com/r/lisp show that we can have it >> spam free for free, without a newsreader. And not requiring a >> newsreader makes it more accessible to newbies aswel. > > a) both of those are moderated > b) each requires a separate account, and neither works with a newsreader > c) noobs preferring web-based systems is a generational trend > d) it would be nice if there were a clean way to aggregate the web > forums -- aggregation was a prime motivation for usenet after all Don't worry, when they'll have to give a name/password for then 101th time, even the newbie generation will eventuall be fed up and will reinvent usenet. Of course, it will be much more complex, XML-based, and require a massively parallel supercomputer to run at acceptable speed. Nonetheless, they're bound to reinvent it. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__
From: Raffael Cavallaro on 26 Apr 2010 19:42 On 2010-04-26 07:46:05 -0400, o.jasper(a)gmail.com said: > Nah, both lispforum.com and reddit.com/r/lisp show that we can have it > spam free for free, without a newsreader. And not requiring a > newsreader makes it more accessible to newbies aswel. Where "it" is a lisp forum that is not frequented by many of the posters for whose views I read c.l.l IOW, lispforum may be newbie friendly, but the disucssion there is, in general, far less interesting than the discussion here. -- Raffael Cavallaro
From: Tim X on 26 Apr 2010 22:53 pjb(a)informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon) writes: > D Herring <dherring(a)at.tentpost.dot.com> writes: > >> On 04/26/2010 07:46 AM, o.jasper(a)gmail.com wrote: >>> Nah, both lispforum.com and reddit.com/r/lisp show that we can have it >>> spam free for free, without a newsreader. And not requiring a >>> newsreader makes it more accessible to newbies aswel. >> >> a) both of those are moderated >> b) each requires a separate account, and neither works with a newsreader >> c) noobs preferring web-based systems is a generational trend >> d) it would be nice if there were a clean way to aggregate the web >> forums -- aggregation was a prime motivation for usenet after all > > > Don't worry, when they'll have to give a name/password for then 101th > time, even the newbie generation will eventuall be fed up and will > reinvent usenet. Of course, it will be much more complex, XML-based, > and require a massively parallel supercomputer to run at acceptable > speed. Nonetheless, they're bound to reinvent it. You forgot to mention it will use SOAP, RPC and a plugin for facebook as well as provide a twitter interface! Tim -- tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au
From: Rupert Swarbrick on 27 Apr 2010 01:58 Raffael Cavallaro <raffaelcavallaro(a)pas.espam.s.il.vous.plait.mac.com> writes: > IOW, lispforum may be newbie friendly, but the disucssion there is, in > general, far less interesting than the discussion here. There might be a connection there...
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Reason to hate loop Next: optimize, inline, oh my (questions) |