Prev: Mathematical Logic and the Strengthened Liar's Paradox
Next: really predicting the masses of elementary particles (mass x space) = particle #566 Correcting Math
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 4 Apr 2010 05:12
Some are going to ask, so you have a unique 3 x 10^10 using the
logarthmic spiral as time
in seconds and the concentric circles as denoted in centimeters, but
that mathematics
has no units for these circles or log-spiral. So how can I be sure
that the 10^10 number
is for centimeters and seconds and not something else?

And my answer is that the final last Finite number determines that
uniqueness. So if we
did the log-spiral and concentric circles with 10^26 we would have
that as the boundary
and that is in meters. But if we had 10^28 then we would be in
centimeters and the circles
and log spiral would fetch 10^8 as speed of light.

You see, since the speed of light is the maximum possible speed, then
the disparity or skew
in the log spiral and circles at that final last Finite Number is the
speed of light.

My troubles in this episode, is reconciling that the distance and time
boundary are so far
smaller than the maximum Planck Unit of Coulomb Interactions inside
atoms such as element
109 is about 10^500. But here with speed, distance and time, the
maximum number is a
mere paltry 10^28 or 10^30 and in comparison to 10^500 those are tiny
and small numbers.

Maybe what I am failing to understand at this moment, is that 10^500
is the ultimate boundary of Finiteness and that we have hierarchy of
smaller boundaries depending on the physics parameter. If dealing with
time and distance then it is on the order of 10^28 to 10^40. But when
dealing with energy and interactions then the number is near 10^500.
So we sort of have
a Universal Space Set, like the events of a universe in probability
theory. So that we can
nest the smaller boundaries inside the larger ultimate Finite
boundary. I hope that is the answer. Again, this reminds me of the
recent history of the genome project where scientists
went into that discovery with a idea that the numbers would be huge
when it turned out that
it was a fraction of the A,C,T, G code.

Now I wonder if there is a Physics maximum for energy. There is a
physics minimum in 0 K
or absolute-zero but that is not going to help me to correlate a log-
spiral and concentric circles
in the manner I did that with speed of light. But maybe the Planck
constant of 10^-34 J*sec can seek some log-spiral and circles
correlation.

What I maybe able to do is some sort of correlation of all the
elements amoung themselves with this log-spiral and circles scheme.
For instance the Coulomb Interactions inside uranium
neptunium and plutonium would have different values of some large
number where uranium
maybe 10^178 and neptunium be 10^184 and plutonium be 10^190 internal
Coulomb Interactions at any instant of time. And using the log spiral
with circles, is there or are there
"points of stability" so that the longest half life of these elements
is connected to how the
log-spiral and circles form a "stability point"? The idea would be
that Elliptic and Hyperbolic
geometry are forming a region of stability.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Mathematical Logic and the Strengthened Liar's Paradox
Next: really predicting the masses of elementary particles (mass x space) = particle #566 Correcting Math