Prev: how do I take care of units whether centimeters or kilometers? isotopic stability #565 Correcting Math
Next: i won.
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 4 Apr 2010 15:28

Remarkable, how I started this book with correcting the Infinitude of
Primes proof,
then giving a proof of the Precision definition of Finite versus
infinite and in these
closing pages, predicting the masses of elementary particles. And that
is a serendipity
predictor, since the LHC in Switzerland is trying to track a Higgs
boson. My opinion
is that the Standard Model was never Physics but a delusional path.
The Standard
Model never made any mass predition, zero, zip as far as even
predicting the mass
of the electron or proton, and here these "delusionals" think that
something like a
Higgs exists. The Standard Model and Higgs boson is like saying, since
Santa Claus
exists, then the tooth fairy exists under my pillow. But let me get to
this new Predictor,
unlike the Standard Model was nothing more than "postdiction
commentary". The
Standard Model was a ludicrous theory in physics to await the time in
which someone
really gave a theory that could actually do real predictions.

So let me get into it. And what I have to offer is this Logarithmic
Spiral set upon a
sphere surface or an ellipsoid surface.

Here are the main, major ideas to attack the prediction of mass:

We have Symmetry Breaking and that is given by the log spiral and the
concentric
circles on the sphere or ellipsoids.

We have to follow this duality rule from the Uncertainty Principle
that mass and space
are dual pairs.

Mass union Space == constant

For example, the electron's mass union space = proton's mass union
space.

In other words, the existence of an elementary particle occurs because
it is a balancing
act between how much space and mass is apportioned.

So for instance: the proton is 938 MeV, and electron is 0.5 MeV. That
means the space
of the proton is tiny and the electron space is large.

Now I am going to make a reasonable assumption that when the proton
and electron are
in a neutron, that the center of the proton and electron coincide.

Here is where I bring in the Symmetry Breaking with the Log-Spiral and
the Elliptic geometry
surface. The Log-Spiral is Hyperbolic geometry.

Now imagine a tiny sphere (electron) inside a bigger sphere (proton)
with their centers
coinciding. Now place a log spiral on each of these sphere surfaces
and the spiral is
doing alright until it gets to the equator. Now at the equator the
spiral reverses its direction
or in physics it has a different charge. Charge is part of this mass
to space duality.

So here is the problem. How to get the log-spirals on the tiny sphere
(electron) and the
bigger sphere (proton) which started at the North Pole, how to get
those spirals to
thence end up at the South Pole. The only way is for the size of the
tiny sphere (electron)
and the bigger sphere (proton) to have a logarithmic diameter.

Notice that the mass of the electron versus the proton is a
logarithmic mass disparity.
Notice that the muon mass versus proton mass is a logarithmic mass
disparity. What I mean is that muon at about 100 and proton at about
1000 is 3^4 versus 3^6.

But getting back to the electron and proton, there log-spirals start
at the North Pole, and they
reach the South Pole. Both particles are stable, meaning that they are
on a sphere surface
not a oblate sphere or a ellipsoid or a combination of ellipsoid and
sphere. So here is the critical question. At what diameter of a sphere
for the electron and what diameter of a sphere
for proton, will the log-spiral at the equator spiral into the South
Pole exactly?

There is only one diameter of a tiny sphere in a bigger sphere, both
sharing centers, at which
the log spiral emanating from the North Pole and then receding into
the South Pole and that diameter is what the electron mass is. Ditto
for the proton mass for it fits the diameter of the
bigger sphere such that the log-spiral returns to the South Pole
exactly.

Up till now, I have used the log-spiral with sphere to determine
Physics constants such as
speed of light, but now I use them to predict and understand why the
electron, proton, muon
have the masses they have.

As far as the Higgs, well, every age or generation of physicists has
their delusionists, and
our generation is no exception. Funny, how their Standard Model never
even predicted the
mass of the electron or proton, and yet these delusionists have the
gall and gumption to
talk about something else. You know, if one cannot do a 10 meter run,
why talk about doing
a marathon.

Summary: So mathematics of the log spiral and sphere surfaces gives
two spheres concentric, and then places a log-spiral on both spheres.
The question of what diameter
of the spheres so that the log-spirals starting at the North Pole will
end up at the South
Pole. There is a unique diameter for the small sphere (electron) and
for the large
sphere (proton) so that the log-spiral starts at North Pole and ends
up exactly on the
South Pole. Those unique diameters is the mass of the electron and the
mass of the
proton.

P.S. Now predicting the mass of the muon requires the log spiral to
end up at both Poles,
but there is a difference here in that the muon is not stable and
decays in 2 x 10^-6 seconds.
So what we have here is that of a deformed sphere or an ellipsoid
attachment to the
2nd hemisphere to make the log-spiral end up at the South Pole. So the
mass of the muon
is predicted by a 1st hemisphere sphere, but the 2nd hemisphere is
deformed so that
the log spiral ends up exactly at the South Pole. So the 2nd
hemisphere is ellipsoid
in shape. Picture a sphere cut in half and a ellipsoid attachment for
the 2nd hemisphere
in order for the log spiral to end up at the South Pole.

So the log-spiral with concentric circles as duality, predicts the
masses of elementary particles.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: how do I take care of units whether centimeters or kilometers? isotopic stability #565 Correcting Math
Next: i won.