From: Esra Sdrawkcab on 5 Oct 2009 04:11 On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:50:00 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote: > "Esra Sdrawkcab" <admin(a)127.0.0.1> ha scritto nel messaggio > news:op.u07rhes0hswpfo(a)dell3100... >> On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 08:23:30 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote: >> >>> >>> "Esra Sdrawkcab" <admin(a)127.0.0.1> ha scritto nel messaggio >>> news:op.u06rdzmrhswpfo(a)dell3100... >>>> On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:36:20 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote: >>>> You don't set the initial cell using the random number generator. >>> >>> why have i to set the initial cell *random*? >>> i choose the first one of the maze >>> >> To match the example competition results! > > What is this result? > > for the program that test mazes "mazetest -v" > all is ok > Ah, sorry, I didn't realise you had tested it; Hmm D:\asm\hcompo29>m 0 +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ ☻ | | | | | | | +--+ +--+ +--+ + +--+--+ +--+ + +--+--+ +--+ + + + + + +--+ + | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +--+ +--+ +--+--+ +--+--+ +--+ +--+--+--+ + +--+--+ + + +--+--+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +--+--+ + +--+ +--+--+ +--+ +--+--+ +--+ + + +--+ +--+ +--+ + | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--+--+ + + + +--+--+ + + +--+--+ + + +--+--+--+ +--+ +--+ + + | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + + + + +--+ + + + + + + +--+--+--+ + +--+--+ + +--+ +--+ + | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +--+ +--+ + + +--+--+--+--+--+ + + + + + +--+--+ + +--+ + + | | | | | | | | | | | | + +--+--+--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+--+--+ + + + + +--+--+--+ +--+--+ + | | | | | | | | | | + +--+--+--+--+ + + + +--+--+ + + +--+--+ +--+--+--+--+--+ +--+--+ | | | | | | | | | | | | + +--+ +--+ + + + +--+--+ +--+--+ + +--+--+--+--+--+--+ + + + + | | | | | | | ⌂ +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ yet D:\asm\hcompo29>example 0 +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ ☻ | | | | | + +--+ + + +--+ + +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ +--+ +--+--+--+--+ +--+ + | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + + + + + + +--+--+ + + +--+ +--+--+--+ + +--+ +--+--+ + +--+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + + + + + +--+--+--+ + + +--+--+ +--+ +--+--+ + + +--+--+--+ + | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + + + + + + +--+ +--+--+ + + +--+ +--+--+ +--+--+--+ + + + + | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +--+ +--+--+--+ +--+--+ +--+--+--+ +--+ +--+ + + +--+--+--+--+ + | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + + +--+--+ + + + + +--+ +--+--+--+ +--+ +--+ + + + + +--+--+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +--+--+ + +--+--+--+ + +--+ + + +--+ +--+ + + + +--+--+ + + | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--+ +--+--+--+ + +--+--+ + + +--+--+ + + + + +--+--+--+ +--+ + | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + + + + + +--+--+ +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ + +--+ +--+ + + | | | | | ⌂ +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ are different D:\asm\hcompo29>nasmw -o entry.com m2.asm D:\asm\hcompo29>tester -v Starting standard test... Testing seeds: ERROR: Output on line 2 column 7 differs when no seed given. Failing command: "entry > tested.maz" Entry failed a standard test. > -- Nuns! Reverse!
From: io_x on 5 Oct 2009 04:25 "Esra Sdrawkcab" <admin(a)127.0.0.1> ha scritto nel messaggio news:op.u080b62hhswpfo(a)dell3100... > On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 08:23:30 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote: > >> >> "Esra Sdrawkcab" <admin(a)127.0.0.1> ha scritto nel messaggio >> news:op.u06rdzmrhswpfo(a)dell3100... >>> On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:36:20 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote: >>> You don't set the initial cell using the random number generator. >> >> why have i to set the initial cell *random*? >> i choose the first one of the maze > > It's a fine maze generator, but it's in the rules; > the generated maze has to match exactly that made by Example.com where is "in the rules"? Then, if that is really in the rules the entry.com file has to use the same algo, the same all of Example.com for doing the same output for n 0...100 then why use the program "mazetest -v" if the output from 0..100 is the same of the example.com? > -- > Nuns! Reverse!
From: Esra Sdrawkcab on 5 Oct 2009 04:08 On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 06:54:19 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote: > > "Benjamin David Lunt" <zfysz(a)frontiernet.net> ha scritto nel messaggio > news:w65ym.24806$tG1.5005(a)newsfe22.iad... >> >> "io_x" <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote in message >> news:4ac833e4$0$1114$4fafbaef(a)reader1.news.tin.it... >>> >>> "io_x" <a(a)b.c.invalid> ha scritto nel messaggio >>> news:4ac5c7f6$0$1106$4fafbaef(a)reader4.news.tin.it... >>>> http://www.frontiernet.net/~fys/hugi/hcompo.htm >>>> This for other information >> >> Hi, >> >> The code below does not pass the test. The test.bat file >> included in the rules does similar to the following: >> >> example n > x.txt >> entry n > e.txt >> fc e.txt x.txt >> where n is a number from 0 to 100 > > Are you saying that the program "entry n" has to be the same output > of the "example n" for n from 0 to 100 ? > > but where it is written in the rules?? > >> if e.txt and x.txt are not equal, then the entry does not >> pass. After looking at your entry, I think you don't get >> the correct random number. >> This is the official one - the rules say it has to (at least) pass the test program - which does exactly the above (that is compare your result with that from example.com for n=0 to 100) You could enter the relaxed unofficail competition, which doesn't require exact match of output, just random mazes: http://temet.es/hcompo/ but 86 bytes is the current leader! -- Nuns! Reverse!
From: Esra Sdrawkcab on 5 Oct 2009 05:01 On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:25:33 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote: > > "Esra Sdrawkcab" <admin(a)127.0.0.1> ha scritto nel messaggio > news:op.u080b62hhswpfo(a)dell3100... >> On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 08:23:30 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote: >> >>> >>> "Esra Sdrawkcab" <admin(a)127.0.0.1> ha scritto nel messaggio >>> news:op.u06rdzmrhswpfo(a)dell3100... >>>> On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:36:20 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote: >>>> You don't set the initial cell using the random number generator. >>> >>> why have i to set the initial cell *random*? >>> i choose the first one of the maze >> >> It's a fine maze generator, but it's in the rules; > >> the generated maze has to match exactly that made by Example.com > > where is "in the rules"? > Then, if that is really in the rules the entry.com file > has to use the same algo, the same all of Example.com > > for doing the same output for n 0...100 > > then why use the program "mazetest -v" if the output > from 0..100 is the same of the example.com? > I think that's for the relaxed rules compo. Current leader is 86 bytes. http://temet.es/hcompo/ -- Nuns! Reverse!
From: io_x on 5 Oct 2009 06:29
"Esra Sdrawkcab" <admin(a)127.0.0.1> ha scritto nel messaggio news:op.u1bh8op8hswpfo(a)dell3100... > On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 06:54:19 +0100, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote: > You could enter the relaxed unofficail competition, which doesn't require > exact match of output, just random mazes: > http://temet.es/hcompo/ > but 86 bytes is the current leader! yes, it seems i follow the rules of http://temet.es/hcompo/ i stop to 156 byte for entry.com now. 156-86= 70 |