From: Benjamin David Lunt on 2 Nov 2009 11:29 "io_x" <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote in message news:4aee9ad3$0$1414$4fafbaef(a)reader4.news.tin.it... > "Esra Sdrawkcab" <admin(a)127.0.0.1> ha scritto nel messaggio > news:op.u2nss1v5hswpfo(a)dell3100... >> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:37:20 -0000, io_x <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote: >>>> I've submitted it to Ben. >>> >>> 169bytes is the limit for me > > here espineter enter print nothing ... > > yes io_x is 169bytes all ok. > > what about the Rosario last version? > (sent to fys@......net on 31/10/2009 9:15 here time) This one did not make it to my inbox. Was the 9:15 above am or pm. Either way, it did not show in my inbox. Ben P.S. Please don't post valid email addresses. Obscure them in one form or another. Thanks.
From: wolfgang kern on 2 Nov 2009 11:50 Esra wrote: .... >> A trick could be to reduce the algo routine to it's final behaviour ? > I can't see how you'd do that. Me neither :) it was just an idea because only two bits were used ... >> Anyway congrats to Rosario for he could reduce his first >380 bytes >> to less than half. > Indeed. > So, the obvious next competition is to do Pacman! :) or have the ghost moving trough the maze. Well done Esra, jump into instructions were my favorites as well. __ wolfgang
From: Esra Sdrawkcab on 2 Nov 2009 13:02 On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:50:43 -0000, wolfgang kern <nowhere(a)never.at> wrote: > > Esra wrote: > ... >>> A trick could be to reduce the algo routine to it's final behaviour ? > >> I can't see how you'd do that. > > Me neither :) it was just an idea because only two bits were used ... > Well yes for moving, but you still need it for setting the start position. >>> Anyway congrats to Rosario for he could reduce his first >380 bytes >>> to less than half. > >> Indeed. > >> So, the obvious next competition is to do Pacman! > > :) or have the ghost moving trough the maze. > > Well done Esra, jump into instructions were my favorites as well. Eh? Don't think it was me doing that. > > __ > wolfgang > > > -- Nuns! Reverse!
From: Rosario P. on 2 Nov 2009 14:09 "Benjamin David Lunt" ha scritto nel messaggio news:gRDHm.11359$zr.3683(a)newsfe04.iad... >> what about the Rosario last version? >> (sent to fys@......net on 31/10/2009 9:15 here time) > > This one did not make it to my inbox. Was the 9:15 above > am or pm. Either way, it did not show in my inbox. it is 9:15 am in my sent box (directory of "posta inviata") in outlool express result 4 post i sent to that address in what i see/remember 30/09/2009 19:01 (this was an error .com file because not past the test0) 01/10/2009 10:53 29/10/2009 13:15 31/10/2009 9:15 > Ben > > P.S. Please don't post valid email addresses. Obscure them > in one form or another. Thanks. sorry i forget about it; hope this is not a big problem
From: Benjamin David Lunt on 2 Nov 2009 15:12
"Rosario P." <a(a)b.c.invalid> wrote in message news:4aef2cc2$0$1102$4fafbaef(a)reader3.news.tin.it... > > "Benjamin David Lunt" ha scritto nel messaggio > news:gRDHm.11359$zr.3683(a)newsfe04.iad... >>> what about the Rosario last version? >>> (sent to fys@......net on 31/10/2009 9:15 here time) >> >> This one did not make it to my inbox. Was the 9:15 above >> am or pm. Either way, it did not show in my inbox. > > it is 9:15 am > in my sent box (directory of "posta inviata") in outlool express > result 4 post i sent to that address > in what i see/remember > 30/09/2009 19:01 (this was an error .com file because not past the > test0) > 01/10/2009 10:53 > 29/10/2009 13:15 > 31/10/2009 9:15 Sorry, for some reason, this email did not make it to my inbox. Maybe it didn't pass my spam blocker. Anyway, I have now included it with the results. Sorry about that, Ben |