iBores
in [UK Mac]
|
From: Rowland McDonnell on 10 Jun 2010 16:04 Tim Streater <timstreater(a)waitrose.com> wrote: > real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid (Rowland McDonnell) wrote: > > > Peter Ceresole <peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > Tim Streater <timstreater(a)waitrose.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Except they got the MMR business quite wrong. > > > > > > Completely wrong. > > > > Nope - that was covered in Eye letters: you claiming that they got it > > wrong just shows you missed the point entirely. > > Except I haven't seen these letters. I just got a sub to the Eye, for > the previous several years I've only bought two or three issues a year. So you've failed to read Private Eye, and yet claim that you know they got it wrong about MMR? Interesting, very interesting. That's a novel approach to evidence based conclusions, that is. So since you've not actually read the Eye's full coverage of the MMR issue, how are you so sure that they got it completely wrong? Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Pd on 10 Jun 2010 16:37 D.M. Procida <real-not-anti-spam-address(a)apple-juice.co.uk> wrote: > <http://metapsychology.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=book&id=3761> Fantastic! That one simple idea explains so many behaviours I've perpetrated, and have seen others perpetrate, throughout my life. Makes a shedload of sense. -- Pd
From: Pd on 10 Jun 2010 16:46 Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > > He is indirectly responsible for several cases of measles, some very > > serious, some fatal. > > Nonsense: those cases are caused by the government refusing to permit > parents to choose a different treatment. If the government hadn't been > so pig-headed, those children would have been vaccinated. The government did not refuse permission for parents to choose a different treatment. Despite my own research into MMR and its safety, my wife got spooked by the Wakefield Doubt and refused to allow our kids to have the triple vaccination. At least she accepted my stand on the much higher risks associated with not being vaccinated, so we sourced the separate vaccinations and had them administered. We were not breaking any laws doing this, the government did not refuse permission. -- Pd
From: D.M. Procida on 10 Jun 2010 17:02 Pd <peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid> wrote: > D.M. Procida <real-not-anti-spam-address(a)apple-juice.co.uk> wrote: > > > <http://metapsychology.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=book&id=3761> > > Fantastic! That one simple idea explains so many behaviours I've > perpetrated, and have seen others perpetrate, throughout my life. Makes > a shedload of sense. It's so rare to find such a simple key that unlocks so many puzzles. I can only think of natural selection for an explanatory theory equally simple and powerful. I'd read the book if I were you - it's a lot better than my review. Daniele
From: The Older Gentleman on 10 Jun 2010 17:17
Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > So you've failed to read Private Eye, and yet claim that you know they > got it wrong about MMR? Can we keep this ng to technical discussions, please? -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com |