Prev: firefox plugins
Next: How to capture this video?
From: Woody on 7 May 2010 11:23 On 07/05/2010 15:49, Trooper wrote: > Woody wrote: >> <http://www.apple.com/uk/pr/library/2010/05/07ipad.html> >> >> Pretty much as I thought: >> >> Wifi: �429, �499 & �599 >> 3G: �529, �599 & �699 >> >> So still on for the 64Gb wifi one, I am not paying �100 for a 3g >> connection! >> > > 32gb wifi for me. > > That should be enough storage for a few songs, all my podcasts and a > load of videos to watch on the train. I use my current iPod touch to do > that and find 16gb a little too restrictive. The extra �100 for the 64gb > is a stretch too far for me though, especially as I assume there will be > another model out this time next year to trade up to! :D > > As to the 3g connection, i'd really like one, but can't really see me > using it that much, especially as i'm moving to an iPhone in the summer > when the new ones are released. I must admit, although I was always saying that the 64GB iPad is the one I would get, I am wondering if I couldn't get away with the 32GB one, as it is quite a jump purely for 64GB. -- Woody
From: Chris Ridd on 7 May 2010 11:37 On 2010-05-07 16:23:07 +0100, Woody said: > On 07/05/2010 15:49, Trooper wrote: >> Woody wrote: >>> <http://www.apple.com/uk/pr/library/2010/05/07ipad.html> >>> >>> Pretty much as I thought: >>> >>> Wifi: �429, �499 & �599 >>> 3G: �529, �599 & �699 >>> >>> So still on for the 64Gb wifi one, I am not paying �100 for a 3g >>> connection! >>> >> >> 32gb wifi for me. >> >> That should be enough storage for a few songs, all my podcasts and a >> load of videos to watch on the train. I use my current iPod touch to do >> that and find 16gb a little too restrictive. The extra �100 for the 64gb >> is a stretch too far for me though, especially as I assume there will be >> another model out this time next year to trade up to! :D >> >> As to the 3g connection, i'd really like one, but can't really see me >> using it that much, especially as i'm moving to an iPhone in the summer >> when the new ones are released. > > I must admit, although I was always saying that the 64GB iPad is the > one I would get, I am wondering if I couldn't get away with the 32GB > one, as it is quite a jump purely for 64GB. Videos will take more space for the higher resolution of the iPad. A gigabyte's about what an HD (H.264) version of a normal length TV program needs, and I guess iPads will want HD. -- Chris
From: Jaimie Vandenbergh on 7 May 2010 11:46 On Fri, 07 May 2010 15:37:51 +0100, Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: ><http://www.apple.com/uk/pr/library/2010/05/07ipad.html> > >Pretty much as I thought: > >Wifi: �429, �499 & �599 >3G: �529, �599 & �699 > >So still on for the 64Gb wifi one, I am not paying �100 for a 3g connection! Too expensive, and damn Apple for putting the GPS on the 3g board. And for not using the iPhone as a data connection (or GPS, for that matter!). Cheers - Jaimie -- panic("Foooooooood fight!"); -- /usr/src/linux/drivers/scsi/aha1542.c
From: Martin S Taylor on 7 May 2010 11:57 Woody wrote > <http://www.apple.com/uk/pr/library/2010/05/07ipad.html> I clicked on this page to look at a picture of the thing. It doesn't take you to a picture, but to a place where you can download a picture of the iPad. But first you have to agree that you mustn't put a picture of an iPad on your t-shirt, since "Any misuse of the Image or breach of this Agreement will cause Apple irreparable harm." The chance to cause irreparable harm to such a totalitarian company is not to be rejected lightly, I think. MST
From: Jaimie Vandenbergh on 7 May 2010 12:25
On Fri, 7 May 2010 16:57:50 +0100, Martin S Taylor <mst(a)hRyEpMnOoVtEiTsHm.cIo.uSk> wrote: >Woody wrote >> <http://www.apple.com/uk/pr/library/2010/05/07ipad.html> > >I clicked on this page to look at a picture of the thing. It doesn't take you >to a picture, but to a place where you can download a picture of the iPad. >But first you have to agree that you mustn't put a picture of an iPad on your >t-shirt, since "Any misuse of the Image or breach of this Agreement will >cause Apple irreparable harm." > >The chance to cause irreparable harm to such a totalitarian company is not to >be rejected lightly, I think. Certainly I consider this sort of thing http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2010/05/ipad_will_it_shred.html to be the likely downfall of Apple. Cheers - Jaimie -- "In the beginning, there was nothing, which exploded." Terry Pratchett |