From: Bruce Horrocks on 7 Jan 2010 07:35 On 06/01/2010 22:03, Pd wrote: > Rowland McDonnell<real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > >> Cuddler of rats, cats and husband" >> Humour alert: >> Any particular husband, or is it just whichever's most convenient? > > Ooh, good point Rowland. > > To Sara: I'm a husband! Cuddle me! > > I guess the blatantly singular "husband" does rather imply a particular > husband, but as any good Newcastle lad knows, "don't you ever let a > chance go by". > (And while I'm there, am I the only one who knows the reference?) > At least she doesn't think you're a rat. -- Bruce Horrocks Surrey England (bruce at scorecrow dot com)
From: Sara on 7 Jan 2010 10:44 In article <1jbwql1.1nr44j8xkwe9iN%real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid>, real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid (Rowland McDonnell) wrote: > "-- > Sara > > Cuddler of rats, cats and husband" > > Humour alert: > > Any particular husband, or is it just whichever's most convenient? Heh - as my *particular* husband is a contributor here, what can I say! Mind you, I suppose I did offer to marry an awful lot of other people here recently... -- Sara Cuddler of rats, cats and husband
From: Sara on 7 Jan 2010 10:45 In article <1jbx3to.1py1od28488ltN%peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid>, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) wrote: > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > > > Cuddler of rats, cats and husband" > > Humour alert: > > Any particular husband, or is it just whichever's most convenient? > > Ooh, good point Rowland. > > To Sara: I'm a husband! Cuddle me! > > I guess the blatantly singular "husband" does rather imply a particular > husband, but as any good Newcastle lad knows, "don't you ever let a > chance go by". > (And while I'm there, am I the only one who knows the reference?) Yes. -- Sara Cuddler of rats, cats and husband
From: Bella Jones on 7 Jan 2010 10:49 Sara <saramerriman(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > In article <1jbx3to.1py1od28488ltN%peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid>, > peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) wrote: > > > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Cuddler of rats, cats and husband" > > > Humour alert: > > > Any particular husband, or is it just whichever's most convenient? > > > > Ooh, good point Rowland. > > > > To Sara: I'm a husband! Cuddle me! > > > > I guess the blatantly singular "husband" does rather imply a particular > > husband, but as any good Newcastle lad knows, "don't you ever let a > > chance go by". > > (And while I'm there, am I the only one who knows the reference?) > > Yes. Sid the Sexist? -- bellajonez at yahoo dot co dot uk
From: Elliott Roper on 7 Jan 2010 10:54
In article <1jbyhb1.wfsqtaa04oa4N%me9(a)privacy.net>, Bella Jones <me9(a)privacy.net> wrote: > Sara <saramerriman(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > > > In article <1jbx3to.1py1od28488ltN%peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid>, > > peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) wrote: > > > > > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > Cuddler of rats, cats and husband" > > > > Humour alert: > > > > Any particular husband, or is it just whichever's most convenient? > > > > > > Ooh, good point Rowland. > > > > > > To Sara: I'm a husband! Cuddle me! > > > > > > I guess the blatantly singular "husband" does rather imply a particular > > > husband, but as any good Newcastle lad knows, "don't you ever let a > > > chance go by". > > > (And while I'm there, am I the only one who knows the reference?) > > > > Yes. > > Sid the Sexist? Wrong Newcastle? Bob Hudson? (Double overhead foxtails anyone?) -- To de-mung my e-mail address:- fsnospam$elliott$$ PGP Fingerprint: 1A96 3CF7 637F 896B C810 E199 7E5C A9E4 8E59 E248 |