From: Bruce Horrocks on
On 06/01/2010 22:03, Pd wrote:
> Rowland McDonnell<real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Cuddler of rats, cats and husband"
>> Humour alert:
>> Any particular husband, or is it just whichever's most convenient?
>
> Ooh, good point Rowland.
>
> To Sara: I'm a husband! Cuddle me!
>
> I guess the blatantly singular "husband" does rather imply a particular
> husband, but as any good Newcastle lad knows, "don't you ever let a
> chance go by".
> (And while I'm there, am I the only one who knows the reference?)
>

At least she doesn't think you're a rat.

--
Bruce Horrocks
Surrey
England
(bruce at scorecrow dot com)
From: Sara on
In article
<1jbwql1.1nr44j8xkwe9iN%real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid>,
real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid (Rowland McDonnell) wrote:

> "--
> Sara
>
> Cuddler of rats, cats and husband"
>
> Humour alert:
>
> Any particular husband, or is it just whichever's most convenient?

Heh - as my *particular* husband is a contributor here, what can I say!

Mind you, I suppose I did offer to marry an awful lot of other people
here recently...

--
Sara

Cuddler of rats, cats and husband
From: Sara on
In article <1jbx3to.1py1od28488ltN%peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid>,
peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) wrote:

> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Cuddler of rats, cats and husband"
> > Humour alert:
> > Any particular husband, or is it just whichever's most convenient?
>
> Ooh, good point Rowland.
>
> To Sara: I'm a husband! Cuddle me!
>
> I guess the blatantly singular "husband" does rather imply a particular
> husband, but as any good Newcastle lad knows, "don't you ever let a
> chance go by".
> (And while I'm there, am I the only one who knows the reference?)

Yes.

--
Sara

Cuddler of rats, cats and husband
From: Bella Jones on
Sara <saramerriman(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <1jbx3to.1py1od28488ltN%peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid>,
> peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) wrote:
>
> > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Cuddler of rats, cats and husband"
> > > Humour alert:
> > > Any particular husband, or is it just whichever's most convenient?
> >
> > Ooh, good point Rowland.
> >
> > To Sara: I'm a husband! Cuddle me!
> >
> > I guess the blatantly singular "husband" does rather imply a particular
> > husband, but as any good Newcastle lad knows, "don't you ever let a
> > chance go by".
> > (And while I'm there, am I the only one who knows the reference?)
>
> Yes.

Sid the Sexist?
--
bellajonez at yahoo dot co dot uk
From: Elliott Roper on
In article <1jbyhb1.wfsqtaa04oa4N%me9(a)privacy.net>, Bella Jones
<me9(a)privacy.net> wrote:

> Sara <saramerriman(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > In article <1jbx3to.1py1od28488ltN%peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid>,
> > peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) wrote:
> >
> > > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Cuddler of rats, cats and husband"
> > > > Humour alert:
> > > > Any particular husband, or is it just whichever's most convenient?
> > >
> > > Ooh, good point Rowland.
> > >
> > > To Sara: I'm a husband! Cuddle me!
> > >
> > > I guess the blatantly singular "husband" does rather imply a particular
> > > husband, but as any good Newcastle lad knows, "don't you ever let a
> > > chance go by".
> > > (And while I'm there, am I the only one who knows the reference?)
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Sid the Sexist?

Wrong Newcastle? Bob Hudson?
(Double overhead foxtails anyone?)

--
To de-mung my e-mail address:- fsnospam$elliott$$
PGP Fingerprint: 1A96 3CF7 637F 896B C810 E199 7E5C A9E4 8E59 E248