From: Chris Rebert on 18 Mar 2010 22:07 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <no-spam(a)extra.super.obfuscation> wrote: > I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to > see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming > this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I expect an apology. My apologies to you then. In my own defense, I will say this is the first complaint I can recall getting about unmungeing the "To:" header when replying to someone on python-list. To ensure your address's privacy in the future, either using a disposable address or putting a /completely/ invalid and unrelated address in the "To:" header are some possible options. Regards, Chris -- This is one of the pitfalls of mail-news gateways I suppose.
From: John Bokma on 18 Mar 2010 22:50
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo(a)geek-central.gen.new_zealand> writes: > In message <mailman.820.1268725930.23598.python-list(a)python.org>, Chris > Rebert wrote: > > I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to > see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming > this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I expect an apology. > Otherwise, it becomes grounds for an abuse complaint to your ISP. Ha ha ha! Get a life. You're using a non-existant tld. I recommend to use .invalid instead, e.g. ldo(a)geek-central.gen.nz.invalid And Chris can make sure that his unobfuscating code doesn't run if the tld is invalid. -- John Bokma j3b Hacking & Hiking in Mexico - http://johnbokma.com/ http://castleamber.com/ - Perl & Python Development |