From: Chris Rebert on
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<no-spam(a)extra.super.obfuscation> wrote:
> I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
> see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming
> this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I expect an apology.

My apologies to you then. In my own defense, I will say this is the
first complaint I can recall getting about unmungeing the "To:" header
when replying to someone on python-list. To ensure your address's
privacy in the future, either using a disposable address or putting a
/completely/ invalid and unrelated address in the "To:" header are
some possible options.

Regards,
Chris
--
This is one of the pitfalls of mail-news gateways I suppose.
From: John Bokma on
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo(a)geek-central.gen.new_zealand> writes:

> In message <mailman.820.1268725930.23598.python-list(a)python.org>, Chris
> Rebert wrote:
>
> I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
> see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming
> this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I expect an apology.
> Otherwise, it becomes grounds for an abuse complaint to your ISP.

Ha ha ha! Get a life. You're using a non-existant tld. I recommend to
use .invalid instead, e.g.

ldo(a)geek-central.gen.nz.invalid

And Chris can make sure that his unobfuscating code doesn't run if the
tld is invalid.


--
John Bokma j3b

Hacking & Hiking in Mexico - http://johnbokma.com/
http://castleamber.com/ - Perl & Python Development