From: Joerg on
Tim Williams wrote:
> "Hammy" <spam(a)spam.com> wrote in message
> news:kpbhm5tdt8aeu5dp1cofgu395583h2r0ju(a)4ax.com...
>> Have you seen the UCC25600 LLC Resonant mode controller.Can only sink
>> source 0.4A-0.8A . The absolute minimum guaranteed gate drive output
>> is 9V
>>
>> http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/ucc25600.html
>
> Ooh, I should revise my induction heater design with one of those. That's
> basically what I'm doing, except the transformer secondary is a hunk of
> metal. ;-)
>

And next time you demo it with a piece of tube held upwards into the
coil at least wear welders gloves :-)

Man, just looking at the video scared me. A guy in the army told me
about a similar experiment except that in his case a chunk of white-hot
metal decided to follow gravity. Missed his hands but landed right onto
one of his shoes ... phssssss ... through the shoe ...

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: Tim Williams on
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:ptehm559ud9m2ok9eqvn39hm4a3k11lenr(a)4ax.com...
> But "storage scope"? Is there any other kind?

Y...no, I guess not:
http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/Images/Photoflash_Discharge2_sm.jpg

Although to be fair, the camera's 10 second exposure really gets all the
credit.

Tim

--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms


From: Tim Williams on
"Joerg" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:7srtseF692U1(a)mid.individual.net...
> And next time you demo it with a piece of tube held upwards into the coil
> at least wear welders gloves :-)

Pssh... I ruined my last pair of welding gloves handling the still-hot
electrochemical cell when I was cooking up chlorate one summer:
http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms/Chem_Chlorate3.html
That square stainless tank is a little too hot to handle bare, but
inevitable spills result in sodium chlorate soaking into the gloves.
Needless to say I kept the gloves well away from welding after that. ;-)

> Man, just looking at the video scared me. A guy in the army told me about
> a similar experiment except that in his case a chunk of white-hot metal
> decided to follow gravity. Missed his hands but landed right onto one of
> his shoes ... phssssss ... through the shoe ...

Nice one! A classic welding incident, too.

I'll keep that in mind when I get the 10kW beast running. For now, I know
exactly how much power I'm delivering, and fortunately, it's not enough to
melt steel. So I've been staying out of the hot convection instead.

Tim

--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms


From: JosephKK on
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:14:58 -0800, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:02:27 -0800 (PST), "miso(a)sushi.com"
><miso(a)sushi.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>> >> Here's my inverter, sort of similar.
>>>
>>> >>ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Inverter.jpg
>>>
>>> >> The thevenin impedance seen by the emitter determines loop gain. I
>>> >> needed the ESR of the tantalum in the output to get good loop
>>> >> stability; startup dV/dT is low enough that a tantalum appears safe
>>> >> here.
>>>
>>> >> Load regulation is surprisingly good, about a tenth of a volt from 80
>>> >> to 500 mA.
>>>
>>> >> John
>>>
>>> >I see a start up problem here. Look at the UVL of the LM5112. Won't
>>> >this circuit whack the inductor while starting up?
>>>
>>> It's designed to start up at about 70% duty cycle. When the output
>>> gets close to -12, the transistor turns on and backs off the duty
>>> cycle to whatever it needs, which should be a bit over 50%.
>>>
>>> John
>>
>>I'm talking about the first pulse. The P-fet will be on because of the
>>UVL being designed with a N-fet in mind. You should be able to see
>>this on a storage scope.
>
>Good point, except that it seems to work fine, even from a
>current-limited bench supply. The UVLO is typically 3 volts, and that
>klunky old NDT2955 has a 2.6 volt threshold, so it's barely on before
>the oscillator starts.
>
>But "storage scope"? Is there any other kind?
>
Absolutely. I have heard that you have a Tek 2465 or similar in working
condition. The instant you think it is a storage scope or do not find
it valuable let me know; i will be there to relieve you of it just as
fast as i can get there.

>>I see a lot of people rolling their own converters and have read the
>>justifications, but seriously, controller chips have (or should have
>>if done well) every contingency in mind. The first pulse, the initial
>>ramp up (soft start), etc. Linear Tech, Maxim, etc parts have been
>>tied to the whipping post and flogged without mercy. If you sell
>>millions of a component, even problems with 1% of them is a total
>>disaster.
>
>There aren't many inverting switchers around. The trick of having a
>regular buck wind its own "ground" rail negative is OK, but usually
>gets into trouble at higher output voltages. This circuit soft-starts
>because the +5 reference comes up fairly slowly, by design. That
>protects the tantalum on the output.
>
>And designing circuits is fun.
>
>But we've had a lot of problems with LDOs and switchers, way more than
>1% of the various parts we've used.
>
>National did this to us, LM3102:
>
>ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/SwitcherRise.JPG
>
>which cost a whole board spin.
>
>John
>
From: John Larkin on
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:26:28 -0800,
"JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:14:58 -0800, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:02:27 -0800 (PST), "miso(a)sushi.com"
>><miso(a)sushi.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> >> Here's my inverter, sort of similar.
>>>>
>>>> >>ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Inverter.jpg
>>>>
>>>> >> The thevenin impedance seen by the emitter determines loop gain. I
>>>> >> needed the ESR of the tantalum in the output to get good loop
>>>> >> stability; startup dV/dT is low enough that a tantalum appears safe
>>>> >> here.
>>>>
>>>> >> Load regulation is surprisingly good, about a tenth of a volt from 80
>>>> >> to 500 mA.
>>>>
>>>> >> John
>>>>
>>>> >I see a start up problem here. Look at the UVL of the LM5112. Won't
>>>> >this circuit whack the inductor while starting up?
>>>>
>>>> It's designed to start up at about 70% duty cycle. When the output
>>>> gets close to -12, the transistor turns on and backs off the duty
>>>> cycle to whatever it needs, which should be a bit over 50%.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>
>>>I'm talking about the first pulse. The P-fet will be on because of the
>>>UVL being designed with a N-fet in mind. You should be able to see
>>>this on a storage scope.
>>
>>Good point, except that it seems to work fine, even from a
>>current-limited bench supply. The UVLO is typically 3 volts, and that
>>klunky old NDT2955 has a 2.6 volt threshold, so it's barely on before
>>the oscillator starts.
>>
>>But "storage scope"? Is there any other kind?
>>
>Absolutely. I have heard that you have a Tek 2465 or similar in working
>condition. The instant you think it is a storage scope or do not find
>it valuable let me know; i will be there to relieve you of it just as
>fast as i can get there.

I have 60 or so oscillscopes, but no 2465s.

I rarely use an analog scope. The only one I occasionally use is a Tek
7104, the 1 GHz scope with the microchannel plate CRT. It's not a
storage scope.

The old Tek storage CRTs don't hold up very well.

My favorite scope is probably my 11802, a 20 GHz sampler. It's
digital, but actually uses a magnetic-deflection CRT for waveform
display.

John