From: krw on 11 May 2010 00:24 On Mon, 10 May 2010 21:14:57 -0700, "JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Mon, 10 May 2010 17:16:54 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" ><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > >>On Sun, 09 May 2010 23:12:57 -0700, "JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 09 May 2010 22:18:45 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" >>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 09 May 2010 09:29:08 -0700, "JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 07 May 2010 17:46:30 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" >>>>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 06 May 2010 21:29:13 -0700, "JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 06 May 2010 17:58:10 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" >>>>>>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 May 2010 21:35:35 -0700, "JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 May 2010 23:37:10 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" >>>>>>>>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 May 2010 20:59:26 -0700, "JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 4 May 2010 16:21:39 -0700, "Joel Koltner" >>>>>>>>>>><zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>news:hb91u5t2ova3gpvhvkr9ost92assaje3j5(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>> We generally don't buy Lattes, or such, but we're not beyond buying a coffee >>>>>>>>>>>>> at Dinkin' Donuts (except that there are none here). I do spend some cash >>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>> hobby stuff, though. Gotta get ready to retire. ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Which hobbies might those be, Keith? I was thinking your main hobby was >>>>>>>>>>>>watching football on a big-screen TV... ;-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Interesting, Keith did not strike me as the big screen type at all. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>We have a 42" plasma. Not huge by today's standards but it works for our >>>>>>>>>>great room. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Use it much? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I watch a couple of hours a night (usually compressed into 90 minutes). SWMBO >>>>>>>>has it on whenever she's awake (and significant time when she's not ;). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>SWMBO use, i keep forgetting that one. (i don't have a SWMBO) >>>>>> >>>>>>Maybe that's why you don't have one? ;-) >>>>> >>>>>It might be a factor. Then again, i never did get much joy out of >>>>>permanently unbalanced relationships. >>>> >>>>Unbalanced? Maybe *that* is your problem. >>> >>>Having had more than one balanced relationship has spoilt me. I won't >>>settle for anything less now. >> >>Given that you've experienced more than one, why would you assume others would >>be unbalanced? > >The very definition of SWBMO requires an unbalanced relationship. >"Low WAF (SAF)" does not necessarily require such but does not preclude >it. Absolute nonsense. >Absence of spousal input on any significant (impacts spouse plans or >desires) decision may indicate injudicious boundaries. Ok... >Adults should balance out, and each will have areas of primacy in >knowledge, interest, time available. These tradeoffs should adapt as the >adults continue to develop, age, and circumstances change. It'll be 39 years in June, so... |