make package-noinstall does not include rc.d scripts?
in [Ports]
|
Prev: lang/gcc44 Inconsistant package list. Leftover files.
Next: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked forbidden
From: Christer Solskogen on 21 Feb 2010 04:47 On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze(a)bsdforen.de> wrote: > So the right solution might be for the "package-noinstall" target to > use "pkg_create -b" and additionally create the symlinks. > > I do not like have different code for doing the same thing in this > context. > Does the target 'package' use pkg_create? -- chs, _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Dominic Fandrey on 21 Feb 2010 05:02 On 21/02/2010 10:47, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze(a)bsdforen.de> wrote: > >> So the right solution might be for the "package-noinstall" target to >> use "pkg_create -b" and additionally create the symlinks. >> >> I do not like have different code for doing the same thing in this >> context. >> > > Does the target 'package' use pkg_create? Yes it does. I have a patch that should do the trick. Would you be so kind to test it? http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado0001/patch-ports-Mk-bsd.port.mk.txt If it does, please open a PR and post the number here. wxs and I can post our patches there and portmgr can decide. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Dominic Fandrey on 21 Feb 2010 06:01 On 21/02/2010 11:02, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On 21/02/2010 10:47, Christer Solskogen wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze(a)bsdforen.de> wrote: >> >>> So the right solution might be for the "package-noinstall" target to >>> use "pkg_create -b" and additionally create the symlinks. >>> >>> I do not like have different code for doing the same thing in this >>> context. >> >> Does the target 'package' use pkg_create? > > Yes it does. More precisely, do-package does. > I have a patch that should do the trick. Would you be so kind to test > it? > http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado0001/patch-ports-Mk-bsd.port.mk.txt > > If it does, please open a PR and post the number here. wxs and I can > post our patches there and portmgr can decide. After testing my patch to my satisfaction I went ahead and opened a PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144164 -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Wesley Shields on 21 Feb 2010 07:24
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:01:50PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On 21/02/2010 11:02, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > > On 21/02/2010 10:47, Christer Solskogen wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze(a)bsdforen.de> wrote: > >> > >>> So the right solution might be for the "package-noinstall" target to > >>> use "pkg_create -b" and additionally create the symlinks. > >>> > >>> I do not like have different code for doing the same thing in this > >>> context. > >> > >> Does the target 'package' use pkg_create? > > > > Yes it does. > > More precisely, do-package does. > > > I have a patch that should do the trick. Would you be so kind to test > > it? > > http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado0001/patch-ports-Mk-bsd.port.mk.txt > > > > If it does, please open a PR and post the number here. wxs and I can > > post our patches there and portmgr can decide. > > After testing my patch to my satisfaction I went ahead and opened a PR: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144164 No need for my patch to make it into the PR. I like your solution better. ;) -- WXS _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org" |