From: Alex Samad on
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 14:50 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/04/2010 11:08 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > I forget your specifics, but you do RAID *and* backup regularly to an
> > external lvm2?
> >
>
> No, no RAID for me *at home*. But at work I manage databases on all
> sorts of (to use a quaint old phrase) super-minicomputers, and if
> they ever needed to "resynchronize" monthly, we'd have tossed them
> out immediately, since for the money we spend on them, they're
> supposed to stay in sync *always*.

maybe resync was the wrong word to use, the consistency of the array is
checked, it shows up in /proc/mdadm as resync

hardware raid controllers do this as well, its like checking you backups
tapes make sure you can restore if needed.


>
> --
> Dissent is patriotic, remember?
>
>



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1273016433.20116.36.camel(a)alex-mini.samad.com.au
From: Hugo Vanwoerkom on
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On Ter, 04 Mai 2010, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> martin f krafft wrote:
>>> RAID is not a backup solution, it's an availability measure.
>>>
>>
>> But as data availability goes up by using RAID doesn't the need for
>> backing up that same data go down? Or is this just semantics?
>
> RAID does not prevent against you accidentaly deleting a file you did
> not want deleted. And the deletion will be immediately reflected to all
> disks in the array.
>
>

Good point. I had overlooked that.

Hugo


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hrv60u$8in$1(a)dough.gmane.org