From: Kenny McCormack on 5 Jul 2010 09:36 In article <3dj8g7xde.ln2(a)news.roaima.co.uk>, Chris Davies <chris(a)roaima.co.uk> wrote: >John Hasler <jhasler(a)newsguy.com> wrote: >>What does "pfexec" do? > >Kenny McCormack <gazelle(a)shell.xmission.com> wrote: >> GIYF > >Based on previous contributions from JH, I don't think he was being >particularly lazy with his question. I would prefer to imagine that he was >trying to point out to the original poster that it would have been helpful >to provide a very brief description of "pfexec" in his first posting. There's no need to (i.e., for him to have done), because, you guessed it, GIYF. -- Just for a change of pace, this sig is *not* an obscure reference to comp.lang.c...
From: Chris Davies on 5 Jul 2010 15:53 Kenny McCormack <gazelle(a)shell.xmission.com> wrote: > There's no need to (i.e., for him to have done), because, you guessed > it, GIYF. And there I disagree with you (*). If someone asks a comparative question here, I would hope there would be enough information on the non-Linux component for someone to be able to answer without needing to go and search elsewhere for additional detail. YMMV of course. Chris (*) on both counts. Google isn't my friend, but it's a good search engine
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Suggest uses for old computers Next: Converting an ext3 filesystem to ext4 |