photo gallery css erratic
in [CSS]
|
From: Josiah Jenkins on 3 Apr 2010 08:12 On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 12:02:02 GMT, "rf" <rf(a)z.invalid> wrote: > >"Josiah Jenkins" <josiah-jenkins(a)somewhere_else.invalid> wrote in message >news:eq8er5h49gv2ka2ligdatj20o7mmm9i25m(a)4ax.com... > >> It displays correctly on my box ! > >> Vista with SP2 >> IE ver : 8.06.001.18882 > > >And how many people are still using versions 7 and 6? > >In the real world? No idea, I use Firefox meself ! > -- http://www.ian-stewart.eu
From: Josiah Jenkins on 3 Apr 2010 08:25 On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:59:30 GMT, "rf" <rf(a)z.invalid> wrote: >"Josiah Jenkins" <josiah-jenkins(a)somewhere_else.invalid> wrote in message >news:eq8er5h49gv2ka2ligdatj20o7mmm9i25m(a)4ax.com... >> On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:33:19 GMT, "rf" <rf(a)z.invalid> wrote: >>>"dorayme" <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message >>>news:dorayme-D4D301.20520803042010(a)news.albasani.net... >>> >>>> <http://dorayme.netweaver.com.au/masonsGallery.html> >>> >>>The above page, in IE, displays the thumbnails one at a time, >>> vertically down the page. >> >> It displays correctly on my box ! > >And your "box" would be? As I said, Vista with SP2 IE ver : 8.06.001.18882 > >> Here's a screenshot : >> http://www.ian-stewart.eu/irs_quick.php > >That is an entirely different page. From what ? There was only one URL quoted and it's dorayme's as above where you said, 'The above page, in IE . . .' The 'quick' page has screengrabs in IE and FF of the 'thumbnails one at a time, vertically down the page'. Well, actually it doesn't ! -- http://www.ian-stewart.eu
From: rf on 3 Apr 2010 09:21 "Josiah Jenkins" <josiah-jenkins(a)somewhere_else.invalid> wrote in message news:14cer59u82fr76vkrncu21bl4n2pui4j1m(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 12:02:02 GMT, "rf" <rf(a)z.invalid> wrote: > >> >>"Josiah Jenkins" <josiah-jenkins(a)somewhere_else.invalid> wrote in message >>news:eq8er5h49gv2ka2ligdatj20o7mmm9i25m(a)4ax.com... >> >>> It displays correctly on my box ! >> >>> Vista with SP2 >>> IE ver : 8.06.001.18882 >> >> >>And how many people are still using versions 7 and 6? >> >>In the real world? > > No idea, I use Firefox meself ! So you write web pages for firefox? I write web pages for the real world, which still includes IE versions 6 and 7. In the majority.
From: Josiah Jenkins on 3 Apr 2010 10:24 On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:21:22 GMT, "rf" <rf(a)z.invalid> wrote: >"Josiah Jenkins" <josiah-jenkins(a)somewhere_else.invalid> wrote >> On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 12:02:02 GMT, "rf" <rf(a)z.invalid> wrote: >>>"Josiah Jenkins" <josiah-jenkins(a)somewhere_else.invalid> wrote >>> >>>> It displays correctly on my box ! >>> >>>> Vista with SP2 >>>> IE ver : 8.06.001.18882 >>> >>>And how many people are still using versions 7 and 6? >>> >>>In the real world? >> >> No idea, I use Firefox meself ! > >So you write web pages for firefox? No, I write webpages for my own amusement. > >I write web pages for the real world, which still includes >IE versions 6 and 7. In the majority. I am under no commercial constraints. If people want to use some variety of Netscape running under Win 95, or another similar out of date set-up, that's up to them but I don't have to cater for them. YMMV ! -- http://www.ian-stewart.eu
From: Albert Ross on 3 Apr 2010 11:46
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:33:19 GMT, "rf" <rf(a)z.invalid> wrote: > >"dorayme" <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message >news:dorayme-D4D301.20520803042010(a)news.albasani.net... > >> And as for the HTML, well I better stop. > >At least it validates. > >> Perhaps, in case I am hurting your feelings, this might be a >> starting point for better: >> >> <http://dorayme.netweaver.com.au/masonsGallery.html> > >dorayme you really should light up wour windows computer and leave it >chuckling away to itself over there in the corner and so making a roost upon >which your cat may keep herself warm. >The above page, in IE, displays the thumbnails one at a time, vertically >down the page. Works in IE8 Lauri's code does just that in the "previewer" of my text editor which is probably based on an old IE but dunno how far back this behaviour changes. I did have IE7 on one of my boxes but it looks like someone (probably me) sneaked in and updated it. Is it still worth going back further than that in terms of how many people are still using earlier IEs? I liked Lauri's gallery because it worked in everything I hit it with and is easy to add to and move stuff around within the galleries because the code's so simple |