From: rf on 3 Apr 2010 06:33 "dorayme" <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:dorayme-D4D301.20520803042010(a)news.albasani.net... > And as for the HTML, well I better stop. At least it validates. > Perhaps, in case I am hurting your feelings, this might be a > starting point for better: > > <http://dorayme.netweaver.com.au/masonsGallery.html> dorayme you really should light up wour windows computer and leave it chuckling away to itself over there in the corner and so making a roost upon which your cat may keep herself warm. The above page, in IE, displays the thumbnails one at a time, vertically down the page. IE does not recognise display: inline-block; *unless* the element is, by default, inline to start with. So, inline-block does not work with a div. It does work with a span. If you replace all the divs with spans in your example (global replace works) it will then work correctly with IE as well as with the more modern browsers. I mention this only because Mr Mason is bound to look at your example with IE and castigate you for ruining his page :-)
From: Josiah Jenkins on 3 Apr 2010 07:31 On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:33:19 GMT, "rf" <rf(a)z.invalid> wrote: >"dorayme" <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message >news:dorayme-D4D301.20520803042010(a)news.albasani.net... > >> And as for the HTML, well I better stop. > >At least it validates. > >> Perhaps, in case I am hurting your feelings, this might be a >> starting point for better: >> >> <http://dorayme.netweaver.com.au/masonsGallery.html> > >dorayme you really should light up wour windows computer and leave it >chuckling away to itself over there in the corner and so making a roost upon >which your cat may keep herself warm. >The above page, in IE, displays the thumbnails one at a time, vertically >down the page. It displays correctly on my box ! Here's a screenshot : http://www.ian-stewart.eu/irs_quick.php Vista with SP2 IE ver : 8.06.001.18882 > >IE does not recognise display: inline-block; *unless* the element is, by >default, inline to start with. So, inline-block does not work with a div. It >does work with a span. If you replace all the divs with spans in your >example (global replace works) it will then work correctly with IE as well >as with the more modern browsers. > >I mention this only because Mr Mason is bound to look at your example with >IE and castigate you for ruining his page :-) > > > > -- http://www.ian-stewart.eu
From: BootNic on 3 Apr 2010 07:38 On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:33:19 GMT "rf" <rf(a)z.invalid> wrote: > > "dorayme" <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message > news:dorayme-D4D301.20520803042010(a)news.albasani.net... > >> And as for the HTML, well I better stop. > > At least it validates. > >> Perhaps, in case I am hurting your feelings, this might be a >> starting point for better: >> >> <http://dorayme.netweaver.com.au/masonsGallery.html> > > dorayme you really should light up wour windows computer and > leave it chuckling away to itself over there in the corner and so > making a roost upon which your cat may keep herself warm. The > above page, in IE, displays the thumbnails one at a time, > vertically down the page. > > IE does not recognise display: inline-block; *unless* the element > is, by default, inline to start with. So, inline-block does not > work with a div. It does work with a span. If you replace all the > divs with spans in your example (global replace works) it will > then work correctly with IE as well as with the more modern > browsers. IE 8 supports inline-block just fine. IE 6 & 7 life support is 100 days and counting, would it be worth correcting the css for that? At any rate, there is no need to edit the html. <!--[if lte IE 7]> <style type="text/css"> #wrap div { display:inline; zoom:1; } </style> <![endif]--> [snip] -- BootNic Sat Apr 3, 2010 07:38 am Behind every successful woman...is a basket of dirty laundry. *Sally Poe* â 100 days remaining
From: rf on 3 Apr 2010 07:59 "Josiah Jenkins" <josiah-jenkins(a)somewhere_else.invalid> wrote in message news:eq8er5h49gv2ka2ligdatj20o7mmm9i25m(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:33:19 GMT, "rf" <rf(a)z.invalid> wrote: >>"dorayme" <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message >>news:dorayme-D4D301.20520803042010(a)news.albasani.net... >> >>> And as for the HTML, well I better stop. >> >>At least it validates. >> >>> Perhaps, in case I am hurting your feelings, this might be a >>> starting point for better: >>> >>> <http://dorayme.netweaver.com.au/masonsGallery.html> >> >>dorayme you really should light up wour windows computer and leave it >>chuckling away to itself over there in the corner and so making a roost >>upon >>which your cat may keep herself warm. >>The above page, in IE, displays the thumbnails one at a time, vertically >>down the page. > > It displays correctly on my box ! And your "box" would be? > Here's a screenshot : > http://www.ian-stewart.eu/irs_quick.php That is an entirely different page. > > Vista with SP2 > IE ver : 8.06.001.18882 >> >>IE does not recognise display: inline-block; *unless* the element is, by >>default, inline to start with. So, inline-block does not work with a div. >>It >>does work with a span. If you replace all the divs with spans in your >>example (global replace works) it will then work correctly with IE as well >>as with the more modern browsers. >> >>I mention this only because Mr Mason is bound to look at your example with >>IE and castigate you for ruining his page :-) >> >> >> >> > -- > http://www.ian-stewart.eu
From: rf on 3 Apr 2010 08:02 "Josiah Jenkins" <josiah-jenkins(a)somewhere_else.invalid> wrote in message news:eq8er5h49gv2ka2ligdatj20o7mmm9i25m(a)4ax.com... > It displays correctly on my box ! > Vista with SP2 > IE ver : 8.06.001.18882 And how many people are still using versions 7 and 6? In the real world?
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: div with a "background-color" won't color the back-ground Next: Tabs Using CSS1 |