prof. Charles N. Moore ?
in [Math]
|
Prev: Ariel Caticha / The Information Geometry of Space and Time
Next: when can we extend 2-forms in submanifold to 2-form on manifold.?
From: Ludovicus on 30 Apr 2010 18:52 On Apr 29, 6:31 pm, master1729 <tommy1...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > prof. Charles N. Moore (university of cincinnati) thought he had proven the prime twins conjecture Until the 1E+6 $ prize will be awarded I will not believe in proofs of Twin primes or Goldbach conjecture. My opinion is that they are impossible to demonstrate because they do not belongs to Arithmetic but to Probability.
From: master1729 on 1 May 2010 06:02 Luis A Rodrizguez wrote : > On Apr 29, 6:31 pm, master1729 <tommy1...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > prof. Charles N. Moore (university of cincinnati) > thought he had proven the prime twins conjecture > > Until the 1E+6 $ prize will be awarded I will not > believe in proofs of > Twin primes or Goldbach conjecture. My opinion is > that they are > impossible to > demonstrate because they do not belongs to Arithmetic > but to > Probability. well the proof is considered to be false anyway , but i just would like to see it.
From: Gerry Myerson on 1 May 2010 23:11 In article <f37394a7-a005-4bdb-a0de-bc3716135352(a)o14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, Ludovicus <luiroto(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Until the 1E+6 $ prize will be awarded I will not believe in proofs > of Twin primes or Goldbach conjecture. My opinion is that they are > impossible to demonstrate because they do not belongs to Arithmetic > but to Probability. So you think it is impossible to demonstrate anything in probability? -- Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
From: Gerry Myerson on 1 May 2010 23:22 In article <a578e10d-30b9-4074-94cd-72fc8e8c193a(a)r11g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, Tonico <Tonicopm(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > About the book by Underwood Dudley: I don't have it. The story is on pages 257-258 of that book. Dudley has an undated newspaper clipping reporting that Moore presented a proof at an Amer Math Soc meeting in Wellesley, Massachusetts. Other evidence indicates the clipping is from a midwestern newspaper during the Second World War. Maybe someone has tracked things down and told Dudley more details. I suppose anyone who really wanted to know could ask Dudley. -- Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
From: Gerry Myerson on 1 May 2010 23:39
Further to my previous post, there was an Amer Math Soc meeting at Wellesley in 1944. There's an article about it at http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS/Repository/1.0/Disseminate?view=body&id=pd f_1&handle=euclid.bams/1183506292 If that doesn't work, just type american mathematical society meeting wellesley into your favorite search engine, and it should come out near the top. The article mentions a paper by C N Moore, Convergence factors in general analysis, Abstract 50-9-221. Doesn't sound like twin primes to me, but who knows? The abstract of Convergence factors in general analysis, II, is at http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS/Repository/1.0/Disseminate?view=body&id=pd f_1&handle=euclid.bams/1183507138 and it has no reference to primes, twin or otherwise. OK, I found Abstract 50-9-221 at http://www.ams.org/journals/bull/1944-50-09/S0002-9904-1944-08189-5/S0002 -9904-1944-08189-5.pdf No mention of primes. Dead end. -- Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email) |