prof. Charles N. Moore ?
in [Math]
|
Prev: Ariel Caticha / The Information Geometry of Space and Time
Next: when can we extend 2-forms in submanifold to 2-form on manifold.?
From: Gerry Myerson on 3 May 2010 18:55 In article <289405134.65207.1272915961309.JavaMail.root(a)gallium.mathforum.org>, master1729 <tommy1729(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Gerry Myerson wrote : > > > In article > > <a578e10d-30b9-4074-94cd-72fc8e8c193a(a)r11g2000yqa.goog > > legroups.com>, > > Tonico <Tonicopm(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > About the book by Underwood Dudley: I don't have > > it. > > > > The story is on pages 257-258 of that book. Dudley has an undated > > newspaper clipping reporting that Moore presented a proof at an > > Amer Math Soc meeting in Wellesley, Massachusetts. Other evidence > > indicates the clipping is from a midwestern newspaper during the > > Second World War. > > > > Maybe someone has tracked things down and told Dudley more details. > > I suppose anyone who really wanted to know could ask Dudley. > > so , is it a blunder of dudley , As I said, if you really want to know, you can ask him - politely. If you don't ask him, I'll take that as evidence that you don't really want to know, you just like seeing your name on sci.math. -- Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
From: master1729 on 4 May 2010 06:37 > In article > <289405134.65207.1272915961309.JavaMail.root(a)gallium.m > athforum.org>, > master1729 <tommy1729(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Gerry Myerson wrote : > > > > > In article > > > > <a578e10d-30b9-4074-94cd-72fc8e8c193a(a)r11g2000yqa.goog > > > legroups.com>, > > > Tonico <Tonicopm(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > About the book by Underwood Dudley: I don't > have > > > it. > > > > > > The story is on pages 257-258 of that book. > Dudley has an undated > > > newspaper clipping reporting that Moore presented > a proof at an > > > Amer Math Soc meeting in Wellesley, > Massachusetts. Other evidence > > > indicates the clipping is from a midwestern > newspaper during the > > > Second World War. > > > > > > Maybe someone has tracked things down and told > Dudley more details. > > > I suppose anyone who really wanted to know could > ask Dudley. > > > > so , is it a blunder of dudley , > > As I said, if you really want to know, you can ask > him - politely. > If you don't ask him, I'll take that as evidence that > you don't > really want to know, you just like seeing your name > on sci.math. > > -- > Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for > email) he probably wont respond. its like writing a letter to wiles , asking if he is sure his flt proof is valid.
From: Gerry Myerson on 4 May 2010 20:37 In article <1917611097.70096.1272983868647.JavaMail.root(a)gallium.mathforum.org>, master1729 <tommy1729(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > In article > > <289405134.65207.1272915961309.JavaMail.root(a)gallium.m > > athforum.org>, > > master1729 <tommy1729(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Gerry Myerson wrote : > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > <a578e10d-30b9-4074-94cd-72fc8e8c193a(a)r11g2000yqa.goog > > > > legroups.com>, > > > > Tonico <Tonicopm(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > About the book by Underwood Dudley: I don't > > have > > > > it. > > > > > > > > The story is on pages 257-258 of that book. > > Dudley has an undated > > > > newspaper clipping reporting that Moore presented > > a proof at an > > > > Amer Math Soc meeting in Wellesley, > > Massachusetts. Other evidence > > > > indicates the clipping is from a midwestern > > newspaper during the > > > > Second World War. > > > > > > > > Maybe someone has tracked things down and told > > Dudley more details. > > > > I suppose anyone who really wanted to know could > > ask Dudley. > > > > > > so , is it a blunder of dudley , > > > > As I said, if you really want to know, you can ask > > him - politely. > > If you don't ask him, I'll take that as evidence that > > you don't > > really want to know, you just like seeing your name > > on sci.math. > > he probably wont respond. He probably will, if you don't come on sounding like you're looking for a fight. > its like writing a letter to wiles , asking if he is sure his flt proof is > valid. Like that. -- Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
From: master1729 on 5 May 2010 10:36 gerry wrote : > In article > <1917611097.70096.1272983868647.JavaMail.root(a)gallium. > mathforum.org>, > master1729 <tommy1729(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > In article > > > > <289405134.65207.1272915961309.JavaMail.root(a)gallium.m > > > athforum.org>, > > > master1729 <tommy1729(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Gerry Myerson wrote : > > > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > > > <a578e10d-30b9-4074-94cd-72fc8e8c193a(a)r11g2000yqa.goog > > > > > legroups.com>, > > > > > Tonico <Tonicopm(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > About the book by Underwood Dudley: I don't > > > have > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > The story is on pages 257-258 of that book. > > > Dudley has an undated > > > > > newspaper clipping reporting that Moore > presented > > > a proof at an > > > > > Amer Math Soc meeting in Wellesley, > > > Massachusetts. Other evidence > > > > > indicates the clipping is from a midwestern > > > newspaper during the > > > > > Second World War. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe someone has tracked things down and > told > > > Dudley more details. > > > > > I suppose anyone who really wanted to know > could > > > ask Dudley. > > > > > > > > so , is it a blunder of dudley , > > > > > > As I said, if you really want to know, you can > ask > > > him - politely. > > > If you don't ask him, I'll take that as evidence > that > > > you don't > > > really want to know, you just like seeing your > name > > > on sci.math. > > > > he probably wont respond. > > He probably will, if you don't come on sounding like > you're > looking for a fight. > > > its like writing a letter to wiles , asking if he > is sure his flt proof is > > valid. > > Like that. > > -- > Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for > email) he can blame the newspaper. that still would get me nowhere. and btw , how come nobody on sci.math knows about charles n moore nor his proof ?? since your all so experienced mathematicians in the math fields ...
From: Robert Israel on 5 May 2010 17:08
master1729 <tommy1729(a)gmail.com> writes: > gerry wrote : > > > > In article > > <1917611097.70096.1272983868647.JavaMail.root(a)gallium. > > mathforum.org>, > > master1729 <tommy1729(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > In article > > > > > > <289405134.65207.1272915961309.JavaMail.root(a)gallium.m > > > > athforum.org>, > > > > master1729 <tommy1729(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Gerry Myerson wrote : > > > > > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > > > > > > <a578e10d-30b9-4074-94cd-72fc8e8c193a(a)r11g2000yqa.goog > > > > > > legroups.com>, > > > > > > Tonico <Tonicopm(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > About the book by Underwood Dudley: I don't > > > > have > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > The story is on pages 257-258 of that book. > > > > Dudley has an undated > > > > > > newspaper clipping reporting that Moore > > presented > > > > a proof at an > > > > > > Amer Math Soc meeting in Wellesley, > > > > Massachusetts. Other evidence > > > > > > indicates the clipping is from a midwestern > > > > newspaper during the > > > > > > Second World War. > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe someone has tracked things down and > > told > > > > Dudley more details. > > > > > > I suppose anyone who really wanted to know > > could > > > > ask Dudley. > > > > > > > > > > so , is it a blunder of dudley , > > > > > > > > As I said, if you really want to know, you can > > ask > > > > him - politely. > > > > If you don't ask him, I'll take that as evidence > > that > > > > you don't > > > > really want to know, you just like seeing your > > name > > > > on sci.math. > > > > > > he probably wont respond. > > > > He probably will, if you don't come on sounding like > > you're > > looking for a fight. > > > > > its like writing a letter to wiles , asking if he > > is sure his flt proof is > > > valid. > > > > Like that. > > > > -- > > Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for > > email) > > he can blame the newspaper. > > that still would get me nowhere. > > and btw , how come nobody on sci.math knows about charles n moore nor his > proof ?? > > since your all so experienced mathematicians in the math fields ... I doubt that many of us are experienced enough, if this was during the Second World War... But MathSciNet does show some results for Charles N. Moore: MR0201863 (34 #1743) Moore, Charles N. Summable series and convergence factors. Dover Publications, Inc., New York 1966 vi+105 pp. 40.00 MR0064892 (16,352a) Moore, Charles N. On relationships between N�rlund means for double series. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 5, (1954). 957--963. (Reviewer: R. G. Cooke) 40.0X MR0011273 (6,141v) Moore, Charles N. Obituary: Harris Hancock, in memoriam. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 50, (1944). 812--815. 01.0X MR1501543 Moore, Charles N. On Gibbs's phenomenon for the developments in Bessel's functions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 32 (1930), no. 3, 409--416. 42C10 (33C10) MR1501386 Moore, Charles N. On convergence factors in multiple series. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 29 (1927), no. 1, 227--238. 40G05 MR1501254 Moore, Charles N. Generalized limits in general analysis. II. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (1923), no. 4, 459--468. 40D25 (26A03 40G05) MR1501214 Moore, Charles N. Generalized limits in general analysis. I. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 24 (1922), no. 2, 79--88. 40A05 (26A24 40A10) MR1501139 Moore, Charles N. On the summability of the developments in Bessel's functions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (1920), no. 2, 107--156. 33C10 (40G05) MR1500937 Moore, Charles N. On convergence factors in double series and the double Fourier's series. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (1913), no. 1, 73--104. 42B05 MR1500886 Moore, Charles N. On the uniform convergence of the developments in Bessel functions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1911), no. 2, 181--206. 65D20 MR1500847 Moore, Charles N. The summability of the developments in Bessel functions, with applications. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1909), no. 4, 391--435. 33C10 MR1502366 Moore, Charles N. Note on the roots of Bessel functions. Ann. of Math. (2) 9 (1908), no. 4, 156--162. MR1500483 Moore, Charles N. Errata: ``On the introduction of convergence factors into summable series and summable integrals'' [Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (1907), no. 2, 299--330; 1500786]. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (1907), no. 4, 535--536. 40A05 (40A30 40F05) MR1500786 Moore, Charles N. On the introduction of convergence factors into summable series and summable integrals. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (1907), no. 2, 299--330. 40A05 (40A30 40F05) I looked at a few of these, and it seems this Charles N Moore was indeed at University of Cincinnati. Of course there's nothing here about twin primes, so presumably his attempted proof was never published. -- Robert Israel israel(a)math.MyUniversitysInitials.ca Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada |