Prev: comparing Cosmic EM lensing versus gravitational lensing for redshift #22; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Chapter 2 Pictures of the Atom Totality; postscript-- redshift resolved #17; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory; replaces Big Bang theory
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 23 Apr 2010 02:08


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(all snipped except for this with its typo error)
> (c) makes Space and time a continuum and not separate entities
> (d) has all galaxies with slow speeds and with Space as motionless
> Cons
> (a) there are no cons since it fits the data

It is probably good that I made that typo error of saying Space and
time a continuum.
It is already known that Space and Time are a continuum. What I am
trying to focus
attention on is the idea of a Space-Time/Matter continuum. Special
Relativity already
has Space and time a continuum. But the important new concept is how
matter fits into
a Space Time continuum.

If the Big Bang with its explosion and redshifts of Space moving
faster than the speed of
light is to be believed in, then it implies that Space is separate
from Matter. And Physics
does not really allow such a concept of Space being independent of the
Matter that resides
in that Space.

Space-time-Matter continuum is what Quantum Mechanics has in its
duality of time and energy since mass and matter are parts of energy.

So the Big Bang theory of redshift, fails, just on the issue of how
matter within Space-time
are separated.

In that Atom Totality theory, Matter is dependent on Space-time, not
independent. And that
you can never have a situation of a Space moving at the speed of
light, whilst it carries
galaxies as if they were ships on a water floating along with the
rapid moving Space.

So the Big Bang believers never really focused on this issue that is a
utter contradiction to
Physics we know. Again, when you have the only theory on the corner or
block grocery store,
you tend to overlook these huge flaws and gaps of reasoning and
understanding.

---

Let me also address a question raised about the experiment with the
fiberglass to prove
that curvature of space causes redshift, and not a explosion of a Big
Bang. The question
was whether the greenhouse fiberglass panels were tinted to a certain
color like green tint
and which would then see all car headlights as red. Whether a tinted
panel forces all
white light to be red. That is a good question. But I tend to think
that even if a tinted
panel were used, that a clear, untinted panel can be found that
matches the redshift
of a tinted panel. In other words, redshifting occurrs in all these
panels due to refraction,
only that the tinted panel has a booster headstart in redshifting.

My greenhouse fiberglass panels are not clear, they are opaque and
they are somewhat
tinted, whether it is a green tint or a blue tint, I am not sure.
Regardless, a clear panel
can be made that matches the redshifting of the tinted ones, only it
is probably much
thicker of a panel to compensate for the refraction.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: comparing Cosmic EM lensing versus gravitational lensing for redshift #22; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Chapter 2 Pictures of the Atom Totality; postscript-- redshift resolved #17; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory; replaces Big Bang theory