Prev: Generators of a cyclic group
Next: AT . Guess Why...
From: master1729 on 18 Apr 2010 12:58 > idiot. > > idiot poster -> master1792 <- idiot poster > > idiot site -> gallium.mathforum.org <- idiot site > > idiot email -> tommy1729(a)gmail.com <- idiot email > > idiot. > > > i suppose drexel university is an idiots university too hmm ?
From: porky_pig_jr on 18 Apr 2010 18:38 On Apr 18, 2:40 pm, master1729 <tommy1...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > idiot. > > i didnt say relativity was wrong or such. > > neither did i say i dont know the answer. > No, no, you've missed the point. You're an idiot regardless.
From: Alan Morgan on 19 Apr 2010 14:08
In article <1609406364.32029.1271595834451.JavaMail.root(a)gallium.mathforum.org>, master1729 <tommy1729(a)gmail.com> wrote: >relativity puzzle ... > >the ' paradox ' > >The moving particle will "think" that the stationary object (lets use a planet) has a huge mass, because in the particle's point of view the planet is moving at an ultra relativistic speed. What if the particle moves fast enough so that the planet becomes a black hole, and the particle gets inside the event horizon? Why does it fly right past (like a photon) and not get trapped? The short answer is "no". Unfortunatly, I don't understand the long answer, but the basic idea is that it's not enough to say that if you have this quantity of mass in that quantity of space you get a black hole - to do a proper analysis you have to... um... I'll let experts explain it: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/black_fast.html Alan -- Defendit numerus |