From: master1729 on
> idiot.
>
> idiot poster -> master1792 <- idiot poster
>
> idiot site -> gallium.mathforum.org <- idiot site
>
> idiot email -> tommy1729(a)gmail.com <- idiot email
>
> idiot.
>
>
>

i suppose drexel university is an idiots university too hmm ?
From: porky_pig_jr on
On Apr 18, 2:40 pm, master1729 <tommy1...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > idiot.
>
> i didnt say relativity was wrong or such.
>
> neither did i say i dont know the answer.
>

No, no, you've missed the point. You're an idiot regardless.
From: Alan Morgan on
In article <1609406364.32029.1271595834451.JavaMail.root(a)gallium.mathforum.org>,
master1729 <tommy1729(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>relativity puzzle ...
>
>the ' paradox '
>
>The moving particle will "think" that the stationary object (lets use a planet) has a huge mass, because in the particle's point of view the planet is moving at an ultra relativistic speed. What if the particle moves fast enough so that the planet becomes a black hole, and the particle gets inside the event horizon? Why does it fly right past (like a photon) and not get trapped?

The short answer is "no". Unfortunatly, I don't understand the long answer,
but the basic idea is that it's not enough to say that if you have this
quantity of mass in that quantity of space you get a black hole - to do a
proper analysis you have to... um... I'll let experts explain it:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/black_fast.html

Alan

--
Defendit numerus
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Generators of a cyclic group
Next: AT . Guess Why...