From: master1729 on
relativity puzzle ...

the ' paradox '

The moving particle will "think" that the stationary object (lets use a planet) has a huge mass, because in the particle's point of view the planet is moving at an ultra relativistic speed. What if the particle moves fast enough so that the planet becomes a black hole, and the particle gets inside the event horizon? Why does it fly right past (like a photon) and not get trapped?
From: Jaymme Boolee on
idiot.


From: master1729 on
> idiot.
>
>

i didnt say relativity was wrong or such.

neither did i say i dont know the answer.

maybe you got that wrong.

then again , 2 posts all insults : usually indicate a no brainer with no impressions , ideas or intentions other than just insulting people ...
From: ksoileau on
On Apr 18, 8:03 am, master1729 <tommy1...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> relativity puzzle ...
>
> the ' paradox '
>
> The moving particle will "think" that the stationary object (lets use a planet) has a huge mass, because in the particle's point of view the planet is moving at an ultra relativistic speed. What if the particle moves fast enough so that the planet becomes a black hole, and the particle gets inside the event horizon? Why does it fly right past (like a photon) and not get trapped?

DISCLAIMER: I'M NOT AN EXPERT

That said, my answer would be that the equivalence of coordinate
frames may only hold true with nonaccelerated frames, and since the
particle is being accelerated by the object, this equivalence does not
hold.

Interesting question, certainly not an idiotic one. I'd like to see an
expert's take on this.

Regards,
Kerry
From: Jaymme Boolee on
idiot.

idiot poster -> master1792 <- idiot poster

idiot site -> gallium.mathforum.org <- idiot site

idiot email -> tommy1729(a)gmail.com <- idiot email

idiot.



 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Generators of a cyclic group
Next: AT . Guess Why...