From: RICCARDO on
Can you suggest reliable dnsbl to use inside my server sendmail ?
From: drfremove on
On May 17, 6:53 am, RICCARDO <ric.castell...(a)alice.it> wrote:
> Can you suggest reliable dnsbl to use inside my server sendmail ?

We have been using Spamhaus for years with success. I wrote up my
initial evaluation at

http://www.nber.org/sys-admin/dnsbl-comparison.html

and haven't had a reason to change my mind.

Daniel Feenberg
From: terryc on
On Thu, 20 May 2010 04:32:47 -0700, drfremove(a)nber.org wrote:

> On May 17, 6:53 am, RICCARDO <ric.castell...(a)alice.it> wrote:
>> Can you suggest reliable dnsbl to use inside my server sendmail ?
>
> We have been using Spamhaus for years with success.

+1. The moment we rolled it out smtp traffic went down by 80% and spam by
99%.
From: Sendmail on
On May 20, 7:09 pm, terryc <newsninespam-s...(a)woa.com.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2010 04:32:47 -0700, drfrem...(a)nber.org wrote:
> > On May 17, 6:53 am, RICCARDO <ric.castell...(a)alice.it> wrote:
> >> Can you suggest reliable dnsbl to use inside my server sendmail ?
>
> > We have been using Spamhaus  for years with success.
>
> +1. The moment we rolled it out smtp traffic went down by 80% and spam by
> 99%.

use spamcop n spamhaus
From: terryc on
On Sat, 22 May 2010 03:52:40 -0700, Sendmail wrote:

> On May 20, 7:09 pm, terryc <newsninespam-s...(a)woa.com.au> wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 May 2010 04:32:47 -0700, drfrem...(a)nber.org wrote:
>> > On May 17, 6:53 am, RICCARDO <ric.castell...(a)alice.it> wrote:
>> >> Can you suggest reliable dnsbl to use inside my server sendmail ?
>>
>> > We have been using Spamhaus  for years with success.
>>
>> +1. The moment we rolled it out smtp traffic went down by 80% and spam
>> by 99%.
>
> use spamcop n spamhaus

spamhaus = tick

spamcop = a kludge the last time I looked.