Prev: Ad Infinitum really means Ad Negatorum; the concepts of "forever and endless and nonstopping" are fictions #474 Correcting Math
Next: OFFAL POSTULATES IN BOTTOM PERISTALSIS
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 28 Feb 2010 02:09


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Previously I wrote that I like to nail these three theorems or proofs:
> > 1) Finite-Selection Theorem
> > 2) Infinity means "negative numbers"
> > 3) Endlessness, infinity, forever, nonstopping, are concepts that are
> > fictional and impossible to exist

One cannot help but think how religion adversely affected mathematics
with its misled conception of infinity as forever. Religion with its
god/s and
everlasting power, and its foreverness. So the moment human
civilization
cottons on to a supernatural, is the moment a misguided concept creeps
into
science and mathematics of the idea of "forever, nonstopping,
everlasting,
almighty, endless."

Unlike the number 0 which can be thought of as nothing, empty. The
concept of
infinity is not an individual number, is it? When we blurt out
infinity or ad infinitum
we kind of mean a process of numbers.

So the trouble with the concept of infinity is that it was too much
enmeshed in
past history with the ideas of religion of supernatural god/s with
their attributes
or endless and unstoppable and foreverness. So in effect we have give
god/s
a number, the exact opposite of 0 as nothing, we attribute god/s as
infinity
with forever and endless.

So that was not really being scientific or science minded work of the
past history
by assigning infinity as meaning endless.

And only until, now, has any scientist really looked at the concept of
infinity with
any depth. But only until 1990 with the birth of the Plutonium Atom
Totality theory
was it even worthwhile to look at infinity, because only with the Atom
Totality could
any scientist or mathematician get away with a statement that Physics
is above
math and that mathematics is only a subset of physics.

Noone could dare clean the dirty and mess house of mathematics, or
even start such
a program unless they started off a correct framework or base or
foundation, that physics
is superior to math and when it comes to cleaning up math, we have to
rely more on
physics.

As was started in the late 1990s, that a Luminet team of researchers
started to
check the cosmic microwave background radiation to see what geometry
best fits that
physics data and they found that the Poincare Dodecahedral Space of a
*finite space*
with a twist of 36 degrees or 10% of the great circle, best fits the
Cosmos geometry.

So that means if we zoom out into space in a fast space ship we
eventually come
back around to our starting point.

That is the same as the Hensel P-adics, that the larger the numbers
become
.....99999 = -1 or .....999998 = -2 they come back around and end up
near zero.

And we see it in Probability theory of all the numbers between 0 and 1
we have
the Central Limit Theorem of the bell shaped curve. Meaning that half
of all those
numbers are negative numbers.

So we see it in infinity of the large becomes curved around to the
starting point
and infinity of the small comes curved around. That infinity thus,
means negative
numbers.

Now I need a historical analogy because people do not understand
reasoning and logic
as well as they understand "similar stories". In physics and astronomy
from Ancient
Greek times to long after Newton when the word Earth was spoken, meant
to the majority of
humans alive, Earth meant a flat planar object that was stationary in
the sky. This was
obvious to them because objects did not fly off of Earth but appeared
stationary and fixed
in place. So Earth meant flat and stationary.

But some time long after Newton, Earth meant a round ball moving
through space around
the Sun.

Now we can all have sympathy for the majority of people from Ancient
Greeks to long
after Newton for believing that Earth was flat and fixed because a
ball shaped Earth moving
in space defyed commonsense that people and objects in the opposite
hemisphere did not
just fly off of Earth and into outer space. We can sympathize with
their wrong believes.

Just as we can sympathize with every human from Pythagoras to 2010 for
believing that
infinity means endless or forever or nonstopping. We can sympathize
because that is what
commonsense falsely led us, and bolstered by religious prattle of a
supernatural.

But we do have infinity just as we do have Earth. Earth is not flat
nor stationary in space.
Infinity is not endless, nor forever. Infinity is the negative
numbers.

Physics does not have a "forever, nor does it have something
unstoppable, nor does
it have endlessness." But Physics is loaded full of positive and
negative items. Positive
and negative numbers abound in physics. And for the first time we have
a nothing number
as 0 but we also have an infinity number as -3 which can be written
as ....99997 in
Hensel p-adics.


Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Ad Infinitum really means Ad Negatorum; the concepts of "forever and endless and nonstopping" are fictions #474 Correcting Math
Next: OFFAL POSTULATES IN BOTTOM PERISTALSIS