Prev: Infinity as the Negative Numbers? #472 Correcting Math
Next: religion influenced a misguided infinity Re: Ad Infinitum really means Ad Negatorum #475 Correcting Math
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 27 Feb 2010 14:49
Previously I wrote that I like to nail these three theorems or proofs:
1) Finite-Selection Theorem
2) Infinity means "negative numbers"
3) Endlessness, infinity, forever, nonstopping, are concepts that are
fictional and impossible to exist

I am now totally confident that the above three are true. The trouble
with Infinity, in the
history of human thought, is that it was hiding behind another idea
that was true. Infinity
is not forever, nor is it endless, nor is it nonstopping, but, rather,
infinity is simply the
negative numbers.

When someone writes Ad Infinitum, what they really are expressing is
that the numbers
or arrows go to the negative numbers and that the arrows in geometry
curve back around
to the starting point. Numbers in mathematics are of two types, finite
or infinite and the
infinite numbers are the negative numbers. This is why Probability
theory has the Central
Limit theorem, the bell shaped curve, is because half of the
probabilities are negative
numbers versus the other half.

Here is an easy proof of (2) and (3) above. I do it in binary of all
the numbers from
0 to Infinity and all the numbers from 0 to 1.

From 0 to Infinity in binary I have 0 and the largest is
11111.....111111. Now I have
a bell shaped curve, or in Elliptic Geometry I have a North and South
Poles. I have
0000....0000 as the North Pole and 1111.....1111 one unit shy of the
North Pole.
I have a South Pole as 100000.....0000 and I have 099999.....9999 as
one unit
shy of the South Pole. In other words, every positive number has its
"negative counterpart".

1111....11111 is -1 and 1111....111110 is -2 and the counterpart of
1111....1111 is
0000....00000. The counterpart of 1111....11110 is 00000.....00001

The reason Mathematics has negative numbers is because without them,
we would not have a Central Limit Theorem nor would we have Elliptic
Geometry.

The concept of Forever, of NonStopping, and of Endless, are just pure
slabs of myth, of
fiction, of falsity.

There is nothing in physics that means nonstopping nor means forever.
There is nothing
in physics that means endless.

There is plenty in physics that means the negative of a positive.

We see it most clearly in the Electron versus the Proton. The Proton
is finite mass and finite
space. The Electron is finite mass and infinite Space. The infinite
space is just the fact that
the electron is negative charge. The Proton is finite space simply
because it is positive
charge.

Charge in Physics simply means negative numbers or the other side of
the hemisphere in
Elliptic Geometry.

Actually, in Physics, the electron sits in the center of the Proton
which sits in the center of
the atom. The Electron Dot Cloud is the spreading out of the
probability in the negative
space.

And the above argument holds true for numbers between 0 and 1 in that
the number
0.9999..... or 0.9999.....99999 is really a negative number. In the
Old Math the number
0.9999..... was ill conceived as being 1 itself, when in fact, half
the numbers from 0 to
1 are negative numbers. Here again, if all the numbers from 0 to 1
were positive numbers
then the Central Limit theorem of Probability theory would be false.

So the easy proof of (2) and (3) is to show that if you have all the
numbers from 0 to
9999....9999 or all the numbers from 0 to 1, that you have negative
numbers as occupying
half the numbers in those intervals. That means infinity is negative
numbers. And thus
for (3) there is no room for "forever, endless, nonstopping".

P.S. 17 years of patience pays off

P.P.S. I need a analogy history in physics of where a concept was
thought to be true
for a long time, until the concept itself was replaced. I think the
analogy that best
fits infinity is the concept of gravity in physics. Where it was
thought unimaginable
that Earth could move in Space and be a ball shaped object, without
people and animals
on the other side-- falling off. Similarly, it was inconceivable that
Infinity meant something
other than forever, nonstopping, endless, when in truth, it simply
means that going
far enough you come back to your starting point because of Elliptic
geometry and because
the negative numbers reside near the positive numbers.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 27 Feb 2010 14:57


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Previously I wrote that I like to nail these three theorems or proofs:
> 1) Finite-Selection Theorem
> 2) Infinity means "negative numbers"
> 3) Endlessness, infinity, forever, nonstopping, are concepts that are
> fictional and impossible to exist
>
> I am now totally confident that the above three are true. The trouble
> with Infinity, in the
> history of human thought, is that it was hiding behind another idea
> that was true. Infinity
> is not forever, nor is it endless, nor is it nonstopping, but, rather,
> infinity is simply the
> negative numbers.
>
> When someone writes Ad Infinitum, what they really are expressing is
> that the numbers
> or arrows go to the negative numbers and that the arrows in geometry
> curve back around
> to the starting point. Numbers in mathematics are of two types, finite
> or infinite and the
> infinite numbers are the negative numbers. This is why Probability
> theory has the Central
> Limit theorem, the bell shaped curve, is because half of the
> probabilities are negative
> numbers versus the other half.
>
> Here is an easy proof of (2) and (3) above. I do it in binary of all
> the numbers from
> 0 to Infinity and all the numbers from 0 to 1.
>
> From 0 to Infinity in binary I have 0 and the largest is
> 11111.....111111. Now I have
> a bell shaped curve, or in Elliptic Geometry I have a North and South
> Poles. I have
> 0000....0000 as the North Pole and 1111.....1111 one unit shy of the
> North Pole.
> I have a South Pole as 100000.....0000 and I have 099999.....9999 as
> one unit

that should be 01111....11111 since I did state binary

> shy of the South Pole. In other words, every positive number has its
> "negative counterpart".
>
> 1111....11111 is -1 and 1111....111110 is -2 and the counterpart of
> 1111....1111 is
> 0000....00000. The counterpart of 1111....11110 is 00000.....00001
>
> The reason Mathematics has negative numbers is because without them,
> we would not have a Central Limit Theorem nor would we have Elliptic
> Geometry.
>
> The concept of Forever, of NonStopping, and of Endless, are just pure
> slabs of myth, of
> fiction, of falsity.
>
> There is nothing in physics that means nonstopping nor means forever.
> There is nothing
> in physics that means endless.
>
> There is plenty in physics that means the negative of a positive.
>
> We see it most clearly in the Electron versus the Proton. The Proton
> is finite mass and finite
> space. The Electron is finite mass and infinite Space. The infinite
> space is just the fact that
> the electron is negative charge. The Proton is finite space simply
> because it is positive
> charge.
>
> Charge in Physics simply means negative numbers or the other side of
> the hemisphere in
> Elliptic Geometry.
>
> Actually, in Physics, the electron sits in the center of the Proton
> which sits in the center of
> the atom. The Electron Dot Cloud is the spreading out of the
> probability in the negative
> space.
>
> And the above argument holds true for numbers between 0 and 1 in that
> the number
> 0.9999..... or 0.9999.....99999 is really a negative number. In the
> Old Math the number
> 0.9999..... was ill conceived as being 1 itself, when in fact, half
> the numbers from 0 to
> 1 are negative numbers. Here again, if all the numbers from 0 to 1
> were positive numbers
> then the Central Limit theorem of Probability theory would be false.
>
> So the easy proof of (2) and (3) is to show that if you have all the
> numbers from 0 to
> 9999....9999 or all the numbers from 0 to 1, that you have negative
> numbers as occupying
> half the numbers in those intervals. That means infinity is negative
> numbers. And thus
> for (3) there is no room for "forever, endless, nonstopping".
>
> P.S. 17 years of patience pays off
>
> P.P.S. I need a analogy history in physics of where a concept was
> thought to be true
> for a long time, until the concept itself was replaced. I think the
> analogy that best
> fits infinity is the concept of gravity in physics. Where it was
> thought unimaginable
> that Earth could move in Space and be a ball shaped object, without
> people and animals
> on the other side-- falling off. Similarly, it was inconceivable that
> Infinity meant something
> other than forever, nonstopping, endless, when in truth, it simply
> means that going
> far enough you come back to your starting point because of Elliptic
> geometry and because
> the negative numbers reside near the positive numbers.
>
> Archimedes Plutonium
> www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Infinity as the Negative Numbers? #472 Correcting Math
Next: religion influenced a misguided infinity Re: Ad Infinitum really means Ad Negatorum #475 Correcting Math