Prev: Demoting a 2003 Domain Controller Hosting SQL Server
Next: How to restore printers on a print server?
From: tom12010 on 8 Apr 2010 10:01 Is this correct about a Windows Server 2008 / 2003 mixed domain with a Windows Server 2008 R2 server with roles DC, AD, TS/RDS, DNS, DHCP?? Only devices that use RDS / Terminal Services in any way (e.g. a Citrix login via Citrix server) need TS/RDS CALs. Within the domain (we have only one domain) all devices that use any of the above-mentioned server roles/services (e.g. DNS, DHCP, etc.) require Server CALs. Hence one might generally have more server device CALs than RDS device CALs?? Thank you...
From: DaveMills on 13 Apr 2010 18:53 On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:01:01 -0700 (PDT), tom12010 <tlyczko(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Is this correct about a Windows Server 2008 / 2003 mixed domain with a >Windows Server 2008 R2 server with roles DC, AD, TS/RDS, DNS, DHCP?? > >Only devices that use RDS / Terminal Services in any way (e.g. a >Citrix login via Citrix server) need TS/RDS CALs. > >Within the domain (we have only one domain) all devices that use any >of the above-mentioned server roles/services (e.g. DNS, DHCP, etc.) >require Server CALs. > >Hence one might generally have more server device CALs than RDS device >CALs?? You seem to be correct? > >Thank you... -- Dave Mills There are 10 types of people, those that understand binary and those that don't.
From: tom12010 on 14 Apr 2010 13:28
On Apr 13, 6:53 pm, DaveMills <DaveMi...(a)newsgroup.nospam> wrote: > You seem to be correct? I gave up and called MS. 5 calls later, I determined that the above analysis is correct. HTH Tom |