Prev: A universe without pi.
Next: Europe's proton collider are liars.
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 13 Jun 2010 05:19


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(all else snipped)
>
> In an Atom Totality theory, since it has superdeterminism, then the
> subject of
> history, whether a country or nation's history or the history of
> science such as
> the history of physics, all those histories are changed, because
> superdeterminism
> alters how we understand history.
>

Now let me spend some time, although not too much time on biology and
the
discovery of science theories by scientists in an Atom Totality run by
superdeterminism.

In the Big Bang theory, there is no superdeterminism but rather we
have Darwin
evolution theory, where it is thought that the best genetics and
environment combine
to produce a person who is best able to think up or experimentally
come upon a science theory. Where the best fit science minds produce
the best science theory.

Let me not write too much about this because I consider this mostly as
"people talk"
whereas this book is about physics and astronomy where one is unlikely
to want to
talk about people. And one of the reasons that the Atomic theory borne
some 2 milleniums
ago in Ancient Greek times was so despised was that it seemed to make
people and
gods irrelevant and it made little unseen atoms as the most important
things.

But let me do some talking about people, scientists and how science
theories are
discovered in an Atom Totality where superdeterminism is the modus
operandi or
the driving action. Superdeterminism is where people are puppets
manipulated by
the Atom Totality Nucleus in order to satisfy the Bell Inequality of
Quantum Mechanics.
There is no free will and hence Darwin Evolution theory is no longer
true but only a
rule that is approximately true some of the time.

So how does a Big Bang believer armed with Darwin Evolution theory
envision a scientist
making a discovery of a science theory such as the Big Bang theory?
Well, to them
they believe that a person becomes a scientist by having good genetics
to think clear
and logical and with a ease of mathematical abilities, coupled with an
environment in
which science skills and learning are fostered such as going to
schools. And then
landing in a science career and doing science as a job. And so the
discovery of the
Big Bang theory with its mathematics and with its Microwave radiation
and with its
Doppler redshift, such persons as Hubble or Einstein we see themselves
as discoverers
of these theories of the Big Bang as a result of their good genetics
and good schooling
and their avid interest in wanting a science discovery.

Now let me say what the Atom Totality with superdeterminism would see
a discovery
of a theory such as the Atom Totality theory. Of course, I discovered
it so I can
say first hand of what it is like. In Superdeterminism, I actually did
not discover
any theory, nor did any other scientist discover any theory of
science. In superdeterminism,
a discoverer or a achiever of science is picked or chosen by the Atom
Totality Nucleus.
Picked and chosen at birth to make the discovery when the time comes,
and in the meantime,
given the training and path leading up to the discovery.

In Big Bang/ Darwinism, probability of science success, of discovery,
depends on
whether there is a genetic favorability and whether the environment
nurtured and fostered
the path to the discovery. In Atom Totality/superdeterminism, genetics
and environment
are besides the point, for the only point is whether a person is
chosen at birth to later in
future years to make a theory of science, and the Nucleus of the Atom
Totality leads that
person all along the path to that discovery.

So in the Big Bang/ Darwinism view of science achievement, these
people are seen as
geniuses of science as having superior genetics with a superior
environment. In the
Atom Totality/superdeterminism these people who make the discoveries
are seen as
"avatars" chosen at birth, and given just enough information in their
windy path through
life to end up making the science discovery they make.

Now in a way, although I would not put too much emphasis on it, in a
way, these two
contrasts should be able to tell us if the Big Bang/Darwinism is true
or whether the
Atom Totality/Superdeterminism is true, by looking at the actual
history of science
events. If the Atom Totality/ Superdeterminism is true, then more
often than not, the
great discoveries in science should often come from those who never
looked promising
to amount to much in science. Who seemed to come out of the clear blue
yonder
and made a huge contribution. And the reverse is also true that we can
have scientists
whose genetics from past family of scientists and who had the finest
schools and who
end up backing a fake theory and can never seem to dismiss the fake
theory but irrationally
hold on to the fake.

If the reader knows the history of physics or of biology or of
mathematics, knows that
many of the most famous discoveries were from so called "outsiders"
and where the
most promising newly minted scientists from the finest schools ended
up as being
cranks of fake theories.

I am going to mention four names that are especially relevant to the
Atom Totality theory
and who follow the Superdeterminism path rather than the Darwinian
path. (1) Dirac,
(2) John Bell (3) DeBroglie (4) Faraday. Both Dirac and Bell were
trained as
engineers, and it is hard to see them ending up as pure theoretical
physicists as
per Darwinian Evolution. DeBroglie was an outsider to physics
altogether and something
seemed to pull him into physics. Faraday is an example of a complete
outsider to science
but was drawn to science by some force, and even when an insider to
science, he
was never able to use mathematics. So science discovery is not
dependent on
genetics, nor on environment, but only on whether one is chosen and
picked for a
mission by the Nucleus of the Atom Totality.

In Big Bang/ Darwinism, the discoveries of great new science should be
the people
who make the highest test scores in science and math. In the Atom
Totality/Superdeterminism, the discoveries of great new science is
more often then not
the outsiders who never fared all that well in schools or even studied
the science
in school, but are pulled to their fate, their destiny by the Nucleus
of the Atom
Totality. And once they are close to their important discoveries, it
is the Nucleus
of the Atom Totality that is guiding them all through their work.

So actually, science theories are not discoveries, but echoes of the
Atom
Totality, using humans as avatars, as portals. This idea that is
prevalent nowadays that
scientists are geniuses and that the chemicals sloshing around in
their
brain to come up with the new theory, is really a grotesque idea of
what really
happens.

If anyone were to keep the statistics from say around 1980 to 2010 of
those that
made the highest College scores in physics and biology and math and
then see
where they ended up in those sciences will be surprized to find out
that they
never measured up to promise, whereas those that come out of the blue
yonder
as never really promising, are the ones who do measure up.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: A universe without pi.
Next: Europe's proton collider are liars.