small aperture test
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Oy! The Snapshooting Idiots! on 7 Nov 2009 20:34 On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:16:23 -0500, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:42:45 -0600, Outing Trolls is FUN! ><otif(a)trollouters.org> wrote: > >>On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:28:56 -0500, tony cooper >><tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:36:18 -0600, Educationg Trolls Is An Endless >>>Task <etiaet(a)somewhere.net> wrote: >>> >>>>For the same reason that pros that shoot with P&S cameras will do the same, not only for the lens, but >>>>for the sensor installed, no two being alike in noise performance for the same camera model. >>> >>>A pro using a P&S. That's like Hermann Maier using barrel staves as >>>skis. >> >>Award winning photos can be taken with a shoe-box pinhole camera in the >>hands of a pro. > >Probably true. Not probably. It *IS* true. > However a pro - a person who makes a living taking >photographs - would not depend on a camera that *might* be capable of >taking a good photograph. A .22 rifle *might* stop the charge of a >charging lion, but the serious hunter would want to be better armed. Yes, arm them with a $798,000 heat-seeking automatic scud-missile launcher that can be fired at 30 MPS (missiles per second) by any fool that points it in the general direction of any Serengeti plain. That should take some hunting skill to kill that lion. Maybe it'll leave part of a paw to mount for their collection. Are you snapshooting DSLR-Trolls this seriously inept, insecure, desperate, and stupid to come up with such inane analogies? But of course you are, you prove it with every post you make.
From: tony cooper on 7 Nov 2009 20:45 On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:53:29 -0800, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >On 2009-11-07 16:16:23 -0800, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> said: > >> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:42:45 -0600, Outing Trolls is FUN! >> <otif(a)trollouters.org> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:28:56 -0500, tony cooper >>> <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:36:18 -0600, Educationg Trolls Is An Endless >>>> Task <etiaet(a)somewhere.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> For the same reason that pros that shoot with P&S cameras will do the >>>>> same, not only for the lens, but >>>>> for the sensor installed, no two being alike in noise performance for >>>>> the same camera model. >>>> >>>> A pro using a P&S. That's like Hermann Maier using barrel staves as >>>> skis. >>> >>> Award winning photos can be taken with a shoe-box pinhole camera in the >>> hands of a pro. >> >> Probably true. However a pro - a person who makes a living taking >> photographs - would not depend on a camera that *might* be capable of >> taking a good photograph. A .22 rifle *might* stop the charge of a >> charging lion, but the serious hunter would want to be better armed. > >I think we have somebody close at hand who would be able to stop that >charging lion with a pointed stick, and capture the "tack sharp, frozen >in mid-stride" image of the event at the same time. The fucker could *talk* the lion to death. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: tony cooper on 7 Nov 2009 20:47 On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:34:03 -0600, Oy! The Snapshooting Idiots! <otsi(a)myprivateurl.net> wrote: >Yes, arm them with a $798,000 heat-seeking automatic scud-missile launcher >that can be fired at 30 MPS (missiles per second) by any fool that points >it in the general direction of any Serengeti plain. That should take some >hunting skill to kill that lion. Maybe it'll leave part of a paw to mount >for their collection. > What's the sale price on a bullshit-seeking automatic spam-writer launcher? -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: Dudley Hanks on 7 Nov 2009 22:04 "Oy! The Snapshooting Idiots!" <otsi(a)myprivateurl.net> wrote in message news:cv6cf5haprgsm0fk7t4eheckob93m7qqa9(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:16:23 -0500, tony cooper > <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >>On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:42:45 -0600, Outing Trolls is FUN! >><otif(a)trollouters.org> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:28:56 -0500, tony cooper >>><tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:36:18 -0600, Educationg Trolls Is An Endless >>>>Task <etiaet(a)somewhere.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>For the same reason that pros that shoot with P&S cameras will do the >>>>>same, not only for the lens, but >>>>>for the sensor installed, no two being alike in noise performance for >>>>>the same camera model. >>>> >>>>A pro using a P&S. That's like Hermann Maier using barrel staves as >>>>skis. >>> >>>Award winning photos can be taken with a shoe-box pinhole camera in the >>>hands of a pro. >> >>Probably true. > > Not probably. It *IS* true. > >> However a pro - a person who makes a living taking >>photographs - would not depend on a camera that *might* be capable of >>taking a good photograph. A .22 rifle *might* stop the charge of a >>charging lion, but the serious hunter would want to be better armed. > > Yes, arm them with a $798,000 heat-seeking automatic scud-missile launcher > that can be fired at 30 MPS (missiles per second) by any fool that points > it in the general direction of any Serengeti plain. That should take some > hunting skill to kill that lion. Maybe it'll leave part of a paw to mount > for their collection. > > Are you snapshooting DSLR-Trolls this seriously inept, insecure, > desperate, > and stupid to come up with such inane analogies? But of course you are, > you > prove it with every post you make. > Somebody with a wee bit of common sense would have opted for something a bit more appropriate... Take Care, Dudley
From: Bob Larter on 9 Nov 2009 06:37
tony cooper wrote: > On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:53:29 -0800, Savageduck > <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > >> On 2009-11-07 16:16:23 -0800, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> said: >> >>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:42:45 -0600, Outing Trolls is FUN! >>> <otif(a)trollouters.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:28:56 -0500, tony cooper >>>> <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:36:18 -0600, Educationg Trolls Is An Endless >>>>> Task <etiaet(a)somewhere.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> For the same reason that pros that shoot with P&S cameras will do the >>>>>> same, not only for the lens, but >>>>>> for the sensor installed, no two being alike in noise performance for >>>>>> the same camera model. >>>>> A pro using a P&S. That's like Hermann Maier using barrel staves as >>>>> skis. >>>> Award winning photos can be taken with a shoe-box pinhole camera in the >>>> hands of a pro. >>> Probably true. However a pro - a person who makes a living taking >>> photographs - would not depend on a camera that *might* be capable of >>> taking a good photograph. A .22 rifle *might* stop the charge of a >>> charging lion, but the serious hunter would want to be better armed. >> I think we have somebody close at hand who would be able to stop that >> charging lion with a pointed stick, and capture the "tack sharp, frozen >> in mid-stride" image of the event at the same time. > > The fucker could *talk* the lion to death. LOL. Too true. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- |