From: "Kevin Grittner" on 16 Jun 2010 19:22 "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner(a)wicourts.gov> wrote: > It sounds like it behaves just fine except for not detecting a > broken connection. Of course I meant in terms of the slave's attempts at retrieving more WAL, not in terms of it applying a second time line. TCP keepalive timeouts don't help with that part of it, just the failure to recognize the broken connection. I suppose someone could argue that's a *feature*, since it gives you two hours to manually intervene before it does something stupid, but that hardly seems like a solution.... -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
|
Pages: 1 Prev: ANNOUNCE list Next: [PATCH] elimination of code duplication in DefineOpFamily() |