From: "Kevin Grittner" on
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner(a)wicourts.gov> wrote:

> It sounds like it behaves just fine except for not detecting a
> broken connection.

Of course I meant in terms of the slave's attempts at retrieving
more WAL, not in terms of it applying a second time line. TCP
keepalive timeouts don't help with that part of it, just the failure
to recognize the broken connection. I suppose someone could argue
that's a *feature*, since it gives you two hours to manually
intervene before it does something stupid, but that hardly seems
like a solution....

-Kevin

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers