Prev: Passenger video of Israeli attack on humanitarian aid ship
Next: EINSTEIN WAS RIGHT - SPACE AND TIME BEND
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 13 Jun 2010 15:35
This is the 4th edition of this book and I apologize that I have been
unable to
get this book in a decent order and organization. It does not read
like a flowing
book as yet and so the flowing reading must wait for some future
edition.

This is the up to date chapters:


I. the theory
 (1) what is this theory?
 (2) pictures of the Atom Totality theory, and history of the theory
 and precursor hints


II. Cosmic characteristics and features; support
 (3) uniform blackbody 2.71 K cosmic microwave background radiation
  and Dark Night sky: Olber's Paradox fully answered
 (4) missing mass conundrum solved
 (5) layered age of Cosmos with 6.5 billion years new Cosmos yet
  old galaxies of the Uranium Atom Totality 20.2 billion years old;
 the data including discussion over the layered ages of the Solar
System where Sun is likely to be twice as old as Jupiter.
 (6) the cosmic distribution of chemical elements
 (7) shape of the Cosmos as 6 lobes of 5f6 as nonrelativistic as
 Cubic, or as relativistic Dodecahedron; color of the cosmos as
plutonium off-white
 (8) Cosmic magnetohydrodynamics: Maxwell Equations applied to
the galaxies.


III. Observational and experimental support


 (9) Redshift of light from galaxies caused by
refraction and scattering, not a Doppler effect
experiment that shows us what the redshift truly is-- curvature
 of the lobes of an Atom Totality
 (10) Telescope experiments as distance tool, telescopic-eclipse-
technique, and upper limit of telescope in distance is about 400
million light years
 (11) Experiment that Space is electromagnetic, not gravitational
with
the upper limit of distance as 400 million light years
 (12) density and distribution of all the galaxies
 (13) Tifft quantized galaxy speeds
 (14) Dirac's new-radioactivities and Dirac's multiplicative-
 creation
 (15) Planetary evidence: "Earth evidence" such as age; zirconium
crystal dating; Titius-Bode Rule as diffraction pattern
 (16) "Solar System evidence" such as CellWell 1 and CellWell2 ;
planet cores ; plane of ecliptic
 (17) Galaxy evidence: "Milky Way evidence" : Exoplanets and
exosolarsystems; Binary Stars
 (18) MECO theory to explain high energy sources and black-hole
theory as science-fiction


IV. Mathematical and logic beauty support
 (19) "pi" and "e" and "i" explained; inverse fine structure
 constant, and proton to electron mass ratio, speed of light, all
 linked and explained
 (20) Bell Inequality with Superdeterminism fits only in an Atom
 Totality theory
 (21) Purpose and meaning of life
 (22) Atomic theory Syllogism


Let me summarize how the "history of physics" goes in an Atom
Totality/
Superdeterminism Universe compared to how "history of physics" occurs
in an Big Bang/Darwin Evolution Universe.

In an Atom Totality, the history of physics follows engineering feats
of accomplishment
in tandem with physics advances. So one can say that the knowledge and
wisdom of
physics is mirrored by what is available at that time in engineering
knowledge. So we could
not have the Maxwell Equations without the electric motor first. We
could not have
Continental Drift without the engineering devices that detected and
measured the
seafloor spreading. We could not have Cell theory without the
microscope. We could not
have the Big Bang theory without the telescope. And we cannot have the
Atom Totality
without the latest engineering devices that will detect the new Dirac
Radioactivities
and whether it is an additive creation process or a multiplicative
creation process.
In Dirac's book "Directions in Physics", he says that the Moon should
be moving away from Earth at a rate of 2cm/year for Multiplicative
Creation. Until now we never really had the
engineering capability nor the precision to make Dirac's measurements.
We do now, and
whether the Moon is the best place to find if Dirac was correct, is
debatable. It maybe that
Earth is easier to find out if Dirac was correct with an elaborate
engineered experiment.
We simply have to measure with precision the incoming cosmic rays and
cosmic gamma
ray bursts. We could not do that during Dirac's lifetime, but our
engineering prowess has
increased enormously since Dirac lived.

So let me summarize the history of physics and how theories are made
in an Atom Totality/
Superdeterminism versus Big Bang/ Darwin Evolution

Atom Totality summary:
(1) The theories mirror reflect the state of art of engineering
technology whether in the
ability to build devices to make accurate measurement or to simply
peer into or look into
a subject realm. So the theories are no better than the state of
engineering at the time.
(2) The discovery of a theory of science is a chain of events where a
person is picked or
chosen by the Atom Totality to make the discovery and where the person
acts like a portal
or avatar for the discovery. Often the discoverer is an outsider of
that science subject.
(3) Knowledge, understanding and science are progressive states not
conditions of
absolute-and-forever knowledge, just as the Atom Totality
is a progression from a Uranium Atom Totality to a Neptunium Atom
Totality to a Plutonium
Atom Totality then on to the next higher Atom Totality
(4) Discovery of a correct science theory depends only on whether the
Nucleus of the
Atom Totality picks and choses a person to make the discovery.

Big Bang/ Darwin Evolution summary:
(1) Special people with their gifted genetics to think clear and
straight and logical
coupled with a better environment such as a school education offers
them the
better chances of discovery of a theory of science. They are called
geniuses if
they do so.
(2) Whether a correct theory of science is discovered, depends on the
probability
of the proper chemicals sloshing around in the brain to put together
that theory.
(3) Science and science theories have an "absolute truth or a forever
quality to them"
(4) Since scientists have the better genetics to think clearly and
logically, that
presented with evidence between two rival theories, these scientists
should
for the most part side with the most compelling logic.
(5) Free will in discovery, in choices of action, and probability
plays a huge
role in whether a science theory is discovered and whether engineering
advances are discovered. Engineering and science theory discovery are
different
realms and do not have to move in tandem.

What does a study of the history of physics or the history of biology
or the
history of geology or the history of chemistry or the history of
astronomy
reveal as to whether Atom Totality/ Superdeterminism or Big Bang/
Darwin Evolution is true? In my opinion, from what histories of
science I have
read, that the close ties between what is engineered as instruments of
measurement
or machines or devices is in synch, lock step with what theories of
science
exist at any given time period. If the engineering is crude, than the
theories of
science are crude also. One only has to look how the microscope
sharpened up
the biology theories or how the telescope sharpened up astronomy
theories.

Once we make a engineering device or instrument that tests Dirac's new
radioactivities, would be the final end of the Big Bang theory. As for
the
Darwin Evolution theory, it was dead when John Bell and Alain Aspect
tested the Bell Inequality. The only trouble here is that few to zero
scientists
ever understood a proper and correct interpretation of the Bell &
Aspect
results. We still see in Wikipedia these daft and silly philosophy
interpretations
such as "locality or counterfactual". Rare is the person who
understands that
the Bell & Aspect experiment means the Universe is superdeterministic.
And funny, how John Bell realized the proper interpretation of his
Bell
Inequality was that of "superdeterminism". So ever since John Bell,
there
are only two people who got the Bell Inequality and its interpretation
correct--
they were John Bell and AP.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
From: bert on 13 Jun 2010 18:23
On Jun 13, 3:35 pm, Archimedes Plutonium
<plutonium.archime...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the 4th edition of this book and I apologize that I have been
> unable to
> get this book in a decent order and organization. It does not read
> like a flowing
> book as yet and so the flowing reading must wait for some future
> edition.
>
> This is the up to date chapters:
>
> I. the theory
>   (1) what is this theory?
>   (2) pictures of the Atom Totality theory, and history of the theory
>   and precursor hints
>
> II. Cosmic characteristics and features; support
>   (3) uniform blackbody 2.71 K cosmic microwave background radiation
>    and Dark Night sky: Olber's Paradox fully answered
>   (4) missing mass conundrum solved
>   (5) layered age of Cosmos with 6.5 billion years new Cosmos yet
>    old galaxies of the Uranium Atom Totality 20.2 billion years old;
>   the data including discussion over the layered ages of the Solar
>  System where Sun is likely to be twice as old as Jupiter.
>   (6) the cosmic distribution of chemical elements
>   (7) shape of the Cosmos as 6 lobes of 5f6 as nonrelativistic as
>   Cubic, or as relativistic Dodecahedron; color of the cosmos as
>  plutonium off-white
>   (8) Cosmic magnetohydrodynamics: Maxwell Equations applied to
> the galaxies.
>
> III. Observational and experimental support
>
>  (9) Redshift of light from galaxies caused by
>  refraction and scattering, not a Doppler effect
> experiment that shows us what the redshift truly is-- curvature
>   of the lobes of an Atom Totality
>   (10) Telescope experiments as distance tool, telescopic-eclipse-
>  technique, and upper limit of telescope in distance is about 400
>  million light years
>   (11) Experiment that Space is electromagnetic, not gravitational
> with
>  the upper limit of distance as 400 million light years
>   (12) density and distribution of all the galaxies
>   (13) Tifft quantized galaxy speeds
>   (14) Dirac's new-radioactivities and Dirac's multiplicative-
>   creation
>   (15) Planetary evidence: "Earth evidence" such as age; zirconium
> crystal   dating; Titius-Bode Rule as diffraction pattern
>   (16) "Solar System evidence" such as CellWell 1 and CellWell2 ;
>  planet cores ; plane of ecliptic
>   (17) Galaxy evidence: "Milky Way evidence" : Exoplanets and
> exosolarsystems; Binary Stars
>   (18) MECO theory to explain high energy sources and black-hole
>  theory as science-fiction
>
> IV. Mathematical and logic beauty support
>   (19) "pi" and "e" and "i" explained; inverse fine structure
>   constant, and proton to electron mass ratio, speed of light, all
>   linked and explained
>   (20) Bell Inequality with Superdeterminism fits only in an Atom
>   Totality theory
>   (21) Purpose and meaning of life
>   (22) Atomic theory Syllogism
>
> Let me summarize how the "history of physics" goes in an Atom
> Totality/
> Superdeterminism Universe compared to how "history of physics" occurs
> in an Big Bang/Darwin Evolution Universe.
>
> In an Atom Totality, the history of physics follows engineering feats
> of accomplishment
> in tandem with physics advances. So one can say that the knowledge and
> wisdom of
> physics is mirrored by what is available at that time in engineering
> knowledge. So we could
> not have the Maxwell Equations without the electric motor first. We
> could not have
> Continental Drift without the engineering devices that detected and
> measured the
> seafloor spreading. We could not have Cell theory without the
> microscope. We could not
> have the Big Bang theory without the telescope. And we cannot have the
> Atom Totality
> without the latest engineering devices that will detect the new Dirac
> Radioactivities
> and whether it is an additive creation process or a multiplicative
> creation process.
> In Dirac's book "Directions in Physics", he says that the Moon should
> be moving away from Earth at a rate of 2cm/year for Multiplicative
> Creation. Until now we never really had the
> engineering capability nor the precision to make Dirac's measurements.
> We do now, and
> whether the Moon is the best place to find if Dirac was correct, is
> debatable. It maybe that
> Earth is easier to find out if Dirac was correct with an elaborate
> engineered experiment.
> We simply have to measure with precision the incoming cosmic rays and
> cosmic gamma
> ray bursts. We could not do that during Dirac's lifetime, but our
> engineering prowess has
> increased enormously since Dirac lived.
>
> So let me summarize the history of physics and how theories are made
> in an Atom Totality/
> Superdeterminism versus Big Bang/ Darwin Evolution
>
> Atom Totality summary:
> (1) The theories mirror reflect the state of art of engineering
> technology whether in the
> ability to build devices to make accurate measurement or to simply
> peer into or look into
> a subject realm. So the theories are no better than the state of
> engineering at the time.
> (2) The discovery of a theory of science is a chain of events where a
> person is picked or
> chosen by the Atom Totality to make the discovery and where the person
> acts like a portal
> or avatar for the discovery. Often the discoverer is an outsider of
> that science subject.
> (3) Knowledge, understanding and science are progressive states not
> conditions of
> absolute-and-forever knowledge, just as the Atom Totality
> is a progression from a Uranium Atom Totality to a Neptunium Atom
> Totality to a Plutonium
> Atom Totality then on to the next higher Atom Totality
> (4) Discovery of a correct science theory depends only on whether the
> Nucleus of the
> Atom Totality picks and choses a person to make the discovery.
>
> Big Bang/ Darwin Evolution summary:
> (1) Special people with their gifted genetics to think clear and
> straight and logical
> coupled with a better environment such as a school education offers
> them the
> better chances of discovery of a theory of science. They are called
> geniuses if
> they do so.
> (2) Whether a correct theory of science is discovered, depends on the
> probability
> of the proper chemicals sloshing around in the brain to put together
> that theory.
> (3) Science and science theories have an "absolute truth or a forever
> quality to them"
> (4) Since scientists have the better genetics to think clearly and
> logically, that
> presented with evidence between two rival theories, these scientists
> should
> for the most part side with the most compelling logic.
> (5) Free will in discovery, in choices of action, and probability
> plays a huge
> role in whether a science theory is discovered and whether engineering
> advances are discovered. Engineering and science theory discovery are
> different
> realms and do not have to move in tandem.
>
> What does a study of the history of physics or the history of biology
> or the
> history of geology or the history of chemistry or the history of
> astronomy
> reveal as to whether Atom Totality/ Superdeterminism or Big Bang/
> Darwin Evolution is true? In my opinion, from what histories of
> science I have
> read, that the close ties between what is engineered as instruments of
> measurement
> or machines or devices is in synch, lock step with what theories of
> science
> exist at any given time period. If the engineering is crude, than the
> theories of
> science are crude also. One only has to look how the microscope
> sharpened up
> the biology theories or how the telescope sharpened up astronomy
> theories.
>
> Once we make a engineering device or instrument that tests Dirac's new
> radioactivities, would be the final end of the Big Bang theory. As for
> the
> Darwin Evolution theory, it was dead when John Bell and Alain Aspect
> tested the Bell Inequality. The only trouble here is that few to zero
> scientists
> ever understood a proper and correct interpretation of the Bell &
> Aspect
> results. We still see in Wikipedia these daft and silly philosophy
> interpretations
> such as "locality or counterfactual". Rare is the person who
> understands that
> the Bell & Aspect experiment means the Universe is superdeterministic.
> And funny, how John Bell realized the proper interpretation of his
> Bell
> Inequality was that of "superdeterminism". So ever since John Bell,
> there
> are only two people who got the Bell Inequality and its interpretation
> correct--
> they were John Bell and AP.
>
> Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

To Ya All Best GUT is "Gravity created and evolved all that is"
Goes well with my G=EMC^2. TreBert
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Passenger video of Israeli attack on humanitarian aid ship
Next: EINSTEIN WAS RIGHT - SPACE AND TIME BEND