EINSTEIN WAS RIGHT - SPACE AND TIME BEND
in [Physics]
|
Prev: summary of "history of physics" and how discoveries of theories are made Chapt 2 #159; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Probabilistic Parametrization calling all geese
From: usenet on 13 Jun 2010 16:57 Einstein was right: space and time bend Ninety years after he expounded his famous theory, a $700m Nasa probe has proved that the universe behaves as he said. Now the race is on to show that the other half of relativity also works By Anushka Asthana and David Smith The Observer, U.K. guardian.co.uk Sunday, April 15, 2007 Under his name in the Oxford English Dictionary is the simple definition: genius. Yet for decades physicists have been asking the question: did Albert Einstein get it wrong? After half a century, seven cancellations and $700m, a mission to test his theory about the universe has finally confirmed that the man was a mastermind -- or at least half proved it. The early results from Gravity Probe B, one of Nasa's most complicated satellites, confirmed yesterday 'to a precision of better than 1 per cent' the assertion Einstein made 90 years ago -- that an object such as the Earth does indeed distort the fabric of space and time. But this -- what is referred to as the 'geodetic' effect -- is only half of the theory. The other, 'frame-dragging', stated that as the world spins it drags the fabric of the universe behind it. Francis Everitt, the Stanford University professor who has devoted his life to investigating Einstein's theory of relativity, told scientists at the American Physical Society it would be another eight months before he could measure the 'frame-dragging' effect precisely. 'Understanding the details is a bit like an archeological dig,' said William Bencze, programme manager for the mission. 'A scientist starts with a bulldozer, follows with a shovel, then finally uses dental picks and toothbrushes to clear the dust away. We're passing out the toothbrushes now.' The Gravity Probe B project was conceived in the late 1950s but suffered decades of delays while other scientists ran tests corroborating Einstein's theory. It was Everitt's determination that stopped it being cancelled. The joint mission between Nasa and Stanford University uses four of the most perfect spheres -- ultra precise gyroscopes -- to detect minute distortions in the fabric of the universe. Everitt's aim was to prove to the highest precision yet if Einstein was correct in the way he described gravity. According to Einstein, in the same way that a large ball placed on a elasticated cloth stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time. A marble moving along the sagging cloth will be drawn towards the ball, as the Earth is to the Sun, but not fall into it as long as it keeps moving at speed. Gravity, argued Einstein, was not an attractive force between bodies as had been previously thought. Few scientists need the final results, which will be revealed in December, to convince them of Einstein's genius. 'From the most esoteric aspects of time dilation through to the beautiful and simple equation, e=mc2, the vast bulk of Einstein's ideas about the universe are standing up to the test of time,' said Robert Massey, from the Royal Astronomical Society. He said the mission was 'legitimate science' to test a theory and confirm its brilliance, but others have criticised the costs and length of the study, claiming that what was announced had already been shown. Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, said the announcement would 'fork no lightning'. The theory explained When Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity in 1915, he found a new way to describe gravity. It was not a force, as Sir Isaac Newton had supposed, but a consequence of the distortion of space and time, conceived together in his theory as 'space-time'. Any object distorts the fabric of space-time and the bigger it is, the greater the effect. Just as a bowling ball placed on a trampoline stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time -- a phenomenon known as the 'geodetic effect'. A marble moving along the trampoline will be drawn inexorably towards the ball. Thus the planets orbiting the Sun are not being pulled by the Sun; they are following the curved space-time deformation caused by the Sun. The reason the planets never fall into the Sun is because of the speed at which they are travelling. According to the theory, matter and energy distort space-time, curving it around themselves. 'Frame dragging' theoretically occurs when the rotation of a large body 'twists' nearby space and time. It is this second part of Einstein's theory that the Nasa mission has yet to corroborate. More at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/apr/15/spaceexploration.universe Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi Om Shanti o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works. o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read, considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number. o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article. FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Since newsgroup posts are being removed by forgery by one or more net terrorists, this post may be reposted several times.
From: BURT on 13 Jun 2010 17:04 On Jun 13, 1:57 pm, use...(a)mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote: > Einstein was right: space and time bend > > Ninety years after he expounded his famous theory, a $700m Nasa probe > has proved that the universe behaves as he said. Now the race is on > to show that the other half of relativity also works > > By Anushka Asthana and David Smith > The Observer, U.K. > guardian.co.uk > Sunday, April 15, 2007 > > Under his name in the Oxford English Dictionary is the simple > definition: genius. Yet for decades physicists have been asking the > question: did Albert Einstein get it wrong? After half a century, > seven cancellations and $700m, a mission to test his theory about the > universe has finally confirmed that the man was a mastermind -- or at > least half proved it. > > The early results from Gravity Probe B, one of Nasa's most > complicated satellites, confirmed yesterday 'to a precision of better > than 1 per cent' the assertion Einstein made 90 years ago -- that an > object such as the Earth does indeed distort the fabric of space and > time. > > But this -- what is referred to as the 'geodetic' effect -- is only > half of the theory. The other, 'frame-dragging', stated that as the > world spins it drags the fabric of the universe behind it. > > Francis Everitt, the Stanford University professor who has devoted > his life to investigating Einstein's theory of relativity, told > scientists at the American Physical Society it would be another eight > months before he could measure the 'frame-dragging' effect precisely. > > 'Understanding the details is a bit like an archeological dig,' said > William Bencze, programme manager for the mission. 'A scientist > starts with a bulldozer, follows with a shovel, then finally uses > dental picks and toothbrushes to clear the dust away. We're passing > out the toothbrushes now.' > > The Gravity Probe B project was conceived in the late 1950s but > suffered decades of delays while other scientists ran tests > corroborating Einstein's theory. It was Everitt's determination that > stopped it being cancelled. The joint mission between Nasa and > Stanford University uses four of the most perfect spheres -- ultra > precise gyroscopes -- to detect minute distortions in the fabric of > the universe. Everitt's aim was to prove to the highest precision yet > if Einstein was correct in the way he described gravity. > > According to Einstein, in the same way that a large ball placed on a > elasticated cloth stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so > planets and stars warp space-time. A marble moving along the sagging > cloth will be drawn towards the ball, as the Earth is to the Sun, but > not fall into it as long as it keeps moving at speed. Gravity, argued > Einstein, was not an attractive force between bodies as had been > previously thought. > > Few scientists need the final results, which will be revealed in > December, to convince them of Einstein's genius. 'From the most > esoteric aspects of time dilation through to the beautiful and simple > equation, e=mc2, the vast bulk of Einstein's ideas about the universe > are standing up to the test of time,' said Robert Massey, from the > Royal Astronomical Society. > > He said the mission was 'legitimate science' to test a theory and > confirm its brilliance, but others have criticised the costs and > length of the study, claiming that what was announced had already > been shown. Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, said the > announcement would 'fork no lightning'. > > The theory explained > > When Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity in 1915, he > found a new way to describe gravity. It was not a force, as Sir Isaac > Newton had supposed, but a consequence of the distortion of space and > time, conceived together in his theory as 'space-time'. Any object > distorts the fabric of space-time and the bigger it is, the greater > the effect. > > Just as a bowling ball placed on a trampoline stretches the fabric > and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time -- a > phenomenon known as the 'geodetic effect'. A marble moving along the > trampoline will be drawn inexorably towards the ball. > > Thus the planets orbiting the Sun are not being pulled by the Sun; > they are following the curved space-time deformation caused by the > Sun. The reason the planets never fall into the Sun is because of the > speed at which they are travelling. > > According to the theory, matter and energy distort space-time, > curving it around themselves. 'Frame dragging' theoretically occurs > when the rotation of a large body 'twists' nearby space and time. It > is this second part of Einstein's theory that the Nasa mission has > yet to corroborate. > > More at:http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/apr/15/spaceexploration.universe > > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi > Om Shanti > > o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational > purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not > have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the > poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for > fair use of copyrighted works. > o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read, > considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current > e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number. > o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are > not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article. > > FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of > which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright > owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the > understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, > democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed > that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as > provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title > 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without > profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included > information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by > subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information > go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml > If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of > your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the > copyright owner. > > Since newsgroup posts are being removed > by forgery by one or more net terrorists, > this post may be reposted several times. Time aether fills the aether of space. Energy floats in its order. Mitch Raemsch
From: usenet on 14 Jun 2010 05:07 Einstein was right: space and time bend Ninety years after he expounded his famous theory, a $700m Nasa probe has proved that the universe behaves as he said. Now the race is on to show that the other half of relativity also works By Anushka Asthana and David Smith The Observer, U.K. guardian.co.uk Sunday, April 15, 2007 Under his name in the Oxford English Dictionary is the simple definition: genius. Yet for decades physicists have been asking the question: did Albert Einstein get it wrong? After half a century, seven cancellations and $700m, a mission to test his theory about the universe has finally confirmed that the man was a mastermind -- or at least half proved it. The early results from Gravity Probe B, one of Nasa's most complicated satellites, confirmed yesterday 'to a precision of better than 1 per cent' the assertion Einstein made 90 years ago -- that an object such as the Earth does indeed distort the fabric of space and time. But this -- what is referred to as the 'geodetic' effect -- is only half of the theory. The other, 'frame-dragging', stated that as the world spins it drags the fabric of the universe behind it. Francis Everitt, the Stanford University professor who has devoted his life to investigating Einstein's theory of relativity, told scientists at the American Physical Society it would be another eight months before he could measure the 'frame-dragging' effect precisely. 'Understanding the details is a bit like an archeological dig,' said William Bencze, programme manager for the mission. 'A scientist starts with a bulldozer, follows with a shovel, then finally uses dental picks and toothbrushes to clear the dust away. We're passing out the toothbrushes now.' The Gravity Probe B project was conceived in the late 1950s but suffered decades of delays while other scientists ran tests corroborating Einstein's theory. It was Everitt's determination that stopped it being cancelled. The joint mission between Nasa and Stanford University uses four of the most perfect spheres -- ultra precise gyroscopes -- to detect minute distortions in the fabric of the universe. Everitt's aim was to prove to the highest precision yet if Einstein was correct in the way he described gravity. According to Einstein, in the same way that a large ball placed on a elasticated cloth stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time. A marble moving along the sagging cloth will be drawn towards the ball, as the Earth is to the Sun, but not fall into it as long as it keeps moving at speed. Gravity, argued Einstein, was not an attractive force between bodies as had been previously thought. Few scientists need the final results, which will be revealed in December, to convince them of Einstein's genius. 'From the most esoteric aspects of time dilation through to the beautiful and simple equation, e=mc2, the vast bulk of Einstein's ideas about the universe are standing up to the test of time,' said Robert Massey, from the Royal Astronomical Society. He said the mission was 'legitimate science' to test a theory and confirm its brilliance, but others have criticised the costs and length of the study, claiming that what was announced had already been shown. Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, said the announcement would 'fork no lightning'. The theory explained When Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity in 1915, he found a new way to describe gravity. It was not a force, as Sir Isaac Newton had supposed, but a consequence of the distortion of space and time, conceived together in his theory as 'space-time'. Any object distorts the fabric of space-time and the bigger it is, the greater the effect. Just as a bowling ball placed on a trampoline stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time -- a phenomenon known as the 'geodetic effect'. A marble moving along the trampoline will be drawn inexorably towards the ball. Thus the planets orbiting the Sun are not being pulled by the Sun; they are following the curved space-time deformation caused by the Sun. The reason the planets never fall into the Sun is because of the speed at which they are travelling. According to the theory, matter and energy distort space-time, curving it around themselves. 'Frame dragging' theoretically occurs when the rotation of a large body 'twists' nearby space and time. It is this second part of Einstein's theory that the Nasa mission has yet to corroborate. More at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/apr/15/spaceexploration.universe Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi Om Shanti o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works. o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read, considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number. o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article. FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Since newsgroup posts are being removed by forgery by one or more net terrorists, this post may be reposted several times.
From: mpc755 on 14 Jun 2010 08:31 On Jun 13, 4:57 pm, use...(a)mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote: > Einstein was right: space and time bend > > Ninety years after he expounded his famous theory, a $700m Nasa probe > has proved that the universe behaves as he said. Now the race is on > to show that the other half of relativity also works > > By Anushka Asthana and David Smith > The Observer, U.K. > guardian.co.uk > Sunday, April 15, 2007 > > Under his name in the Oxford English Dictionary is the simple > definition: genius. Yet for decades physicists have been asking the > question: did Albert Einstein get it wrong? After half a century, > seven cancellations and $700m, a mission to test his theory about the > universe has finally confirmed that the man was a mastermind -- or at > least half proved it. > > The early results from Gravity Probe B, one of Nasa's most > complicated satellites, confirmed yesterday 'to a precision of better > than 1 per cent' the assertion Einstein made 90 years ago -- that an > object such as the Earth does indeed distort the fabric of space and > time. > > But this -- what is referred to as the 'geodetic' effect -- is only > half of the theory. The other, 'frame-dragging', stated that as the > world spins it drags the fabric of the universe behind it. > > Francis Everitt, the Stanford University professor who has devoted > his life to investigating Einstein's theory of relativity, told > scientists at the American Physical Society it would be another eight > months before he could measure the 'frame-dragging' effect precisely. > > 'Understanding the details is a bit like an archeological dig,' said > William Bencze, programme manager for the mission. 'A scientist > starts with a bulldozer, follows with a shovel, then finally uses > dental picks and toothbrushes to clear the dust away. We're passing > out the toothbrushes now.' > > The Gravity Probe B project was conceived in the late 1950s but > suffered decades of delays while other scientists ran tests > corroborating Einstein's theory. It was Everitt's determination that > stopped it being cancelled. The joint mission between Nasa and > Stanford University uses four of the most perfect spheres -- ultra > precise gyroscopes -- to detect minute distortions in the fabric of > the universe. Everitt's aim was to prove to the highest precision yet > if Einstein was correct in the way he described gravity. > > According to Einstein, in the same way that a large ball placed on a > elasticated cloth stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so > planets and stars warp space-time. A marble moving along the sagging > cloth will be drawn towards the ball, as the Earth is to the Sun, but > not fall into it as long as it keeps moving at speed. Gravity, argued > Einstein, was not an attractive force between bodies as had been > previously thought. > > Few scientists need the final results, which will be revealed in > December, to convince them of Einstein's genius. 'From the most > esoteric aspects of time dilation through to the beautiful and simple > equation, e=mc2, the vast bulk of Einstein's ideas about the universe > are standing up to the test of time,' said Robert Massey, from the > Royal Astronomical Society. > > He said the mission was 'legitimate science' to test a theory and > confirm its brilliance, but others have criticised the costs and > length of the study, claiming that what was announced had already > been shown. Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, said the > announcement would 'fork no lightning'. > > The theory explained > > When Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity in 1915, he > found a new way to describe gravity. It was not a force, as Sir Isaac > Newton had supposed, but a consequence of the distortion of space and > time, conceived together in his theory as 'space-time'. Any object > distorts the fabric of space-time and the bigger it is, the greater > the effect. > > Just as a bowling ball placed on a trampoline stretches the fabric > and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time -- a > phenomenon known as the 'geodetic effect'. A marble moving along the > trampoline will be drawn inexorably towards the ball. > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state." The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the aether's state of displacement. Aether and matter are different states of the same material. The material is maether. Maether has mass. Aether and matter have mass. Aether is uncompressed maether and matter is compressed maether. Aether is displaced by matter. The aether is not at rest when displaced and 'displaces back'. The 'displacing back' is the pressure exerted by the aether. Gravity is pressure exerted by displaced aether towards matter. Just as a bowling ball placed in a tank of water displaces the water, so does matter displace the aether. Just as a void does not remain in the displaced water when the bowling ball is removed due to the pressure exerted by the water towards the bowling ball, the displaced aether exerts pressure towards the matter. > Thus the planets orbiting the Sun are not being pulled by the Sun; > they are following the curved space-time deformation caused by the > Sun. The reason the planets never fall into the Sun is because of the > speed at which they are travelling. > > According to the theory, matter and energy distort space-time, > curving it around themselves. 'Frame dragging' theoretically occurs > when the rotation of a large body 'twists' nearby space and time. It > is this second part of Einstein's theory that the Nasa mission has > yet to corroborate. > > More at:http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/apr/15/spaceexploration.universe > > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi > Om Shanti > > o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational > purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not > have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the > poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for > fair use of copyrighted works. > o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read, > considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current > e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number. > o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are > not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article. > > FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of > which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright > owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the > understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, > democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed > that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as > provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title > 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without > profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included > information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by > subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information > go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml > If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of > your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the > copyright owner. > > Since newsgroup posts are being removed > by forgery by one or more net terrorists, > this post may be reposted several times.
From: Arindam Banerjee on 14 Jun 2010 08:35
On Jun 14, 10:31 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 13, 4:57 pm, use...(a)mantra.com and/orwww.mantra.com/jai(Dr. > > > > > > Jai Maharaj) wrote: > > Einstein was right: space and time bend > > > Ninety years after he expounded his famous theory, a $700m Nasa probe > > has proved that the universe behaves as he said. Now the race is on > > to show that the other half of relativity also works > > > By Anushka Asthana and David Smith > > The Observer, U.K. > > guardian.co.uk > > Sunday, April 15, 2007 > > > Under his name in the Oxford English Dictionary is the simple > > definition: genius. Yet for decades physicists have been asking the > > question: did Albert Einstein get it wrong? After half a century, > > seven cancellations and $700m, a mission to test his theory about the > > universe has finally confirmed that the man was a mastermind -- or at > > least half proved it. > > > The early results from Gravity Probe B, one of Nasa's most > > complicated satellites, confirmed yesterday 'to a precision of better > > than 1 per cent' the assertion Einstein made 90 years ago -- that an > > object such as the Earth does indeed distort the fabric of space and > > time. > > > But this -- what is referred to as the 'geodetic' effect -- is only > > half of the theory. The other, 'frame-dragging', stated that as the > > world spins it drags the fabric of the universe behind it. > > > Francis Everitt, the Stanford University professor who has devoted > > his life to investigating Einstein's theory of relativity, told > > scientists at the American Physical Society it would be another eight > > months before he could measure the 'frame-dragging' effect precisely. > > > 'Understanding the details is a bit like an archeological dig,' said > > William Bencze, programme manager for the mission. 'A scientist > > starts with a bulldozer, follows with a shovel, then finally uses > > dental picks and toothbrushes to clear the dust away. We're passing > > out the toothbrushes now.' > > > The Gravity Probe B project was conceived in the late 1950s but > > suffered decades of delays while other scientists ran tests > > corroborating Einstein's theory. It was Everitt's determination that > > stopped it being cancelled. The joint mission between Nasa and > > Stanford University uses four of the most perfect spheres -- ultra > > precise gyroscopes -- to detect minute distortions in the fabric of > > the universe. Everitt's aim was to prove to the highest precision yet > > if Einstein was correct in the way he described gravity. > > > According to Einstein, in the same way that a large ball placed on a > > elasticated cloth stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so > > planets and stars warp space-time. A marble moving along the sagging > > cloth will be drawn towards the ball, as the Earth is to the Sun, but > > not fall into it as long as it keeps moving at speed. Gravity, argued > > Einstein, was not an attractive force between bodies as had been > > previously thought. > > > Few scientists need the final results, which will be revealed in > > December, to convince them of Einstein's genius. 'From the most > > esoteric aspects of time dilation through to the beautiful and simple > > equation, e=mc2, the vast bulk of Einstein's ideas about the universe > > are standing up to the test of time,' said Robert Massey, from the > > Royal Astronomical Society. > > > He said the mission was 'legitimate science' to test a theory and > > confirm its brilliance, but others have criticised the costs and > > length of the study, claiming that what was announced had already > > been shown. Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, said the > > announcement would 'fork no lightning'. > > > The theory explained > > > When Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity in 1915, he > > found a new way to describe gravity. It was not a force, as Sir Isaac > > Newton had supposed, but a consequence of the distortion of space and > > time, conceived together in his theory as 'space-time'. Any object > > distorts the fabric of space-time and the bigger it is, the greater > > the effect. > > > Just as a bowling ball placed on a trampoline stretches the fabric > > and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time -- a > > phenomenon known as the 'geodetic effect'. A marble moving along the > > trampoline will be drawn inexorably towards the ball. > > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html > > "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections > with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... > disregarding the causes which condition its state." > > The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the > matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the > aether's state of displacement. > > Aether and matter are different states of the same material. > The material is maether. > Maether has mass. > Aether and matter have mass. > Aether is uncompressed maether and matter is compressed maether. > Aether is displaced by matter. > The aether is not at rest when displaced and 'displaces back'. > The 'displacing back' is the pressure exerted by the aether. > Gravity is pressure exerted by displaced aether towards matter. > > Just as a bowling ball placed in a tank of water displaces the water, > so does matter displace the aether. No. Aether permeates everything. Everything moves in aether, and aether is in everything. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee Just as a void does not remain in > the displaced water when the bowling ball is removed due to the > pressure exerted by the water towards the bowling ball, the displaced > aether exerts pressure towards the matter. |