the adventure of photography
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: George Kerby on 2 May 2010 20:52 On 5/2/10 9:51 AM, in article 5ca60d35-1db3-4979-b61f-04137c00b236(a)k29g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, "sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On 2 mei, 16:31, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> [.. babbling ..] > > Why don't you just crawl back under your rock, you little nazi > cockroach! You should really learn punctuation, asswipe. Why don't you go play on the runways at Schiphol?
From: sobriquet on 2 May 2010 23:55 On 3 mei, 02:52, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On 5/2/10 9:51 AM, in article > 5ca60d35-1db3-4979-b61f-04137c00b...(a)k29g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, > > "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > On 2 mei, 16:31, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> [.. babbling ..] > > > Why don't you just crawl back under your rock, you little nazi > > cockroach! > > You should really learn punctuation, asswipe. > > Why don't you go play on the runways at Schiphol? Hey, English is not my native language.. so could you kindly explain me what's wrong with my punctuation? Thanks in advance, shitstain.
From: tony cooper on 3 May 2010 01:16 On Sun, 2 May 2010 20:55:24 -0700 (PDT), sobriquet <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On 3 mei, 02:52, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> On 5/2/10 9:51 AM, in article >> 5ca60d35-1db3-4979-b61f-04137c00b...(a)k29g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, >> >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> > On 2 mei, 16:31, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> [.. babbling ..] >> >> > Why don't you just crawl back under your rock, you little nazi >> > cockroach! >> >> You should really learn punctuation, asswipe. >> >> Why don't you go play on the runways at Schiphol? > >Hey, English is not my native language.. so could you kindly explain >me what's >wrong with my punctuation? > >Thanks in advance, shitstain. There wasn't anything wrong with your punctuation in that post. He thinks there should be a question mark at the end, but he's mistaken. It was an indirect question so no question mark should be used. You should capitalize "Nazi", though. It is your thinking, not your punctuation, that is wrong. That, and the fact that you are obnoxious. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: sobriquet on 3 May 2010 05:42 On 3 mei, 07:16, tony cooper <tony_cooper...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > On Sun, 2 May 2010 20:55:24 -0700 (PDT), sobriquet > > > > > > <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >On 3 mei, 02:52, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On 5/2/10 9:51 AM, in article > >> 5ca60d35-1db3-4979-b61f-04137c00b...(a)k29g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, > > >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > On 2 mei, 16:31, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> [.. babbling ..] > > >> > Why don't you just crawl back under your rock, you little nazi > >> > cockroach! > > >> You should really learn punctuation, asswipe. > > >> Why don't you go play on the runways at Schiphol? > > >Hey, English is not my native language.. so could you kindly explain > >me what's > >wrong with my punctuation? > > >Thanks in advance, shitstain. > > There wasn't anything wrong with your punctuation in that post. He > thinks there should be a question mark at the end, but he's mistaken. > It was an indirect question so no question mark should be used. You > should capitalize "Nazi", though. > > It is your thinking, not your punctuation, that is wrong. That, and > the fact that you are obnoxious. > > -- > Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida If people try to expose my supposed flawed thinking by means of arguments in a civilized manner, I usually respond in a civilized manner and try to have a discussion based on arguments. If people try to demonize my position in the debate instead, by falsely accusing me of theft, I will demonize them in return by accusing them of fascism. I don't see why I should put up with people who disrespect my outlook on things and expect me to respect their outlook on things. So if people try to impose their view on me in an obnoxious fashion, I will respond in an obnoxious fashion, because I'm not in favor of the idea of turning the other cheek when people hit you in the face.
From: tony cooper on 3 May 2010 19:36
On Mon, 3 May 2010 02:42:57 -0700 (PDT), sobriquet <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> It is your thinking, not your punctuation, that is wrong. �That, and >> the fact that you are obnoxious. > >If people try to expose my supposed flawed thinking by means of >arguments in a civilized >manner, I usually respond in a civilized manner and try to have a >discussion based on >arguments. >If people try to demonize my position in the debate instead, by >falsely >accusing me of theft, I will demonize them in return by accusing them >of fascism. > >I don't see why I should put up with people who disrespect my outlook >on things and expect >me to respect their outlook on things. > >So if people try to impose their view on me in an obnoxious fashion, I >will respond in an obnoxious fashion, because I'm not in favor of the >idea of turning the other cheek when people hit you in the face. As a Netherlander, you should be more aware of what "Nazi" means. That is not a term that should be used in a minor spat like this. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |