From: Ray Fischer on 11 May 2010 01:53 whisky-dave <whisky-dave(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >"sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> You are a nazi cockroach that belongs in jail along with all the rest >> of the nazi scum that fail to respect human rights. > >and again, and again,...... If he had brains he wouldn't need to steal. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Russ D on 12 May 2010 11:22 On Wed, 12 May 2010 14:11:15 +0100, "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave(a)final.front.ear> wrote: > >"sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:00db77da-5123-47f6-bfea-90c5d0970c74(a)b18g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... >> On 10 mei, 14:37, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >>> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> >>> news:a73c523e-fe7e-4c75-8b7c-17019381e543(a)n15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... >>> On 7 mei, 16:19, "Peter" <peter...(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote in message >>> > > >>> You aren't allowed to keep library books unless you are a thief. >>> Most people return them. >> >> That's besides the point. >No it's not, libraries should only be used by those people that are willing >to return the books they borrow. Otherwise if librarys lent to peolpe like >you they'd soon have no books left. That's a particularly bad analogy. You didn't quite think it through, did you. What's so wonderful about the internet library is that you can borrow a book and never return it. The original book still remains for anyone to borrow and they also never have to return it. There is no loss of anyone's books by borrowing them indefinitely if they are digital.
From: Peter on 12 May 2010 16:16 "sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:2d14e154-b791-4e05-a4aa-cf4c4986be90(a)b18g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > You can read books for free at the library. You need a paid form of > membership to borrow books. True > Where I live, it's legal to go to the library and bring a digital > camera and make a copy from > books for personal use. So that's exactly the same as downloading an > ebook online. > Both are legal, but I sympathize with you guys who live in a fascist > police state where people > are not allowed to access information freely. Personal use only. Not to share. Assuming you do live in the Netherlands the law expressly prohibits sharing without paying the publisher a fee. Please stop trolling. http://www.copyright.com/viewPage.do?pageCode=s41 -- Peter
From: sobriquet on 12 May 2010 18:21 On 12 mei, 22:16, "Peter" <peter...(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: > "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:2d14e154-b791-4e05-a4aa-cf4c4986be90(a)b18g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > You can read books for free at the library. You need a paid form of > > membership to borrow books. > > True > > > Where I live, it's legal to go to the library and bring a digital > > camera and make a copy from > > books for personal use. So that's exactly the same as downloading an > > ebook online. > > Both are legal, but I sympathize with you guys who live in a fascist > > police state where people > > are not allowed to access information freely. > > Personal use only. Not to share. Assuming you do live in the Netherlands the > law expressly prohibits sharing without paying the publisher a fee. Please > stop trolling. > > http://www.copyright.com/viewPage.do?pageCode=s41 > > -- > Peter True. Not to share. But I do it anyway since copyright laws primarily serve corporations and corporations more or less own the government, so they have been able to manipulate the situation to suit their interests. Hence, I share information freely without respecting spurious intellectual property claims. This makes me someone with a blatant disrespect for copyright laws and I freely acknowledge this to anyone who points this out. However, when people call me a thief for doing so (which is a form of demonization, given that, at no point during copyright infringement is anything being taken away from anyone), I respond by demonizing them in turn by calling them a nazi. I have a very strong conviction that the UDHR grants me the right to share information freely, just like the UDHR grants me the freedom to pursue a lifestyle of my preference, provided I don't infringe upon the freedom of others, even if that involves growing cannabis at home if those happen to be my favorite flowers. The UDHR is intended to protect the interests of individual citizens like me, when the government fails to do so, because they primarily act to serve the interests of corporations. It was invented after the nazi scum in former Nazi Germany set a particularly nasty example of what can happen when the government blatantly disrespects human rights.
From: Ray Fischer on 13 May 2010 01:57
sobriquet <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On 12 mei, 22:16, "Peter" <peter...(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:2d14e154-b791-4e05-a4aa-cf4c4986be90(a)b18g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... >> >> > You can read books for free at the library. You need a paid form of >> > membership to borrow books. >> >> True >> >> > Where I live, it's legal to go to the library and bring a digital >> > camera and make a copy from >> > books for personal use. So that's exactly the same as downloading an >> > ebook online. >> > Both are legal, but I sympathize with you guys who live in a fascist >> > police state where people >> > are not allowed to access information freely. >> >> Personal use only. Not to share. Assuming you do live in the Netherlands the >> law expressly prohibits sharing without paying the publisher a fee. Please >> stop trolling. >> >> http://www.copyright.com/viewPage.do?pageCode=s41 > >True. Not to share. But I do it anyway since copyright laws primarily >serve corporations And because you're a thief. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net |