vibrators
in [Design]
|
From: Otto Bahn on 10 May 2010 16:19 "Marvin J. Mooney" <ms99cc77(a)newsfroup.net> wrote >>> And some keep following shiny things back and forth through Usenet's >>> murky waters. > > Won't someone please think of the SHINY HAPPY PEOPUMS? Whiney sappy peopums holding hams. --oTTo--
From: krw on 10 May 2010 18:15 On Mon, 10 May 2010 19:57:31 +0100, Adam Funk <a24061(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On 2010-05-10, krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote: > >> Speaking of pots... > >Aren't they usually called variable resistors these days? No.
From: Hatunen on 10 May 2010 21:25 On Mon, 10 May 2010 17:15:11 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >On Mon, 10 May 2010 19:57:31 +0100, Adam Funk <a24061(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>On 2010-05-10, krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote: >> >>> Speaking of pots... >> >>Aren't they usually called variable resistors these days? > >No. Woosh... -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: Giles on 10 May 2010 23:16 On May 10, 9:02 am, riverman <myronb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 10, 1:25 pm, Franz Gnaedinger <f...(a)bluemail.ch> wrote: > > > > > Kibology is a Dada surrogate for the mentally poor > > and half debile, allk they can is interrupt a thread > > and abuse other fora than their own as chatrooms. > > Translation? These pinheads are telling themselves and one another that they are deucedly clever and witty. And they all pretend to believe it. Beats eating a bullet (they strive desperately to believe). No translation needed. g.
From: krw on 10 May 2010 23:40
On Mon, 10 May 2010 18:25:55 -0700, Hatunen <hatunen(a)cox.net> wrote: >On Mon, 10 May 2010 17:15:11 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" ><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > >>On Mon, 10 May 2010 19:57:31 +0100, Adam Funk <a24061(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>On 2010-05-10, krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote: >>> >>>> Speaking of pots... >>> >>>Aren't they usually called variable resistors these days? >> >>No. > >Woosh... Idiot |