vibrators
in [Design]
|
From: barbara on 6 May 2010 17:06 On Thu, 06 May 2010 16:26:10 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >barbara(a)bookpro.com wrote: >> >> On Wed, 05 May 2010 22:25:56 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell" >> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >> >> >"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote: >> >> >> >> I think someone (at least one) misunderstood. I don't think they were >> >> criticizing you, rather elaborating or even having some fun. At least it >> >> started out that way. ...or maybe *I* missed it. ;-) >> >> >> >> In any case, the Usenet is a wild place. If you can't take the criticism, get >> >> out of the kitchen. ;-) >> > >> > >> > Some people are born with no sense of humor. Others had it >> >surgically removed. :( >> >> And some keep following shiny things back and forth through Usenet's >> murky waters. > > > Really? Then you should climb back on the short bus, and go back to >the nut hatch. I see you're not as highly developed as youresteemed buddy who doesn't call people jackasses. And as someone who continued to chase oTTo's lures for so long, you're hardly an authority on things shiny. BW
From: krw on 6 May 2010 18:55 On Thu, 6 May 2010 10:13:45 -0400, "Otto Bahn" <Ladybrrane(a)GroinToHell.com> wrote: >"Mark Edwards" <Mark-Edwards(a)comcast.net> wrote > >>>As originally designed, a score of 500 on a test section was the >>>average, while each 100 above or below represented a standard >>>deviation. > >That's just plain silly. There's only three standard deviations above >average according to your logic...? We all know that logic isn't your strength. You needn't demonstrate your single-digit IQ with every post. > >> While it may be true, I see no reason to call oTTo a deviant. Sheesh! > >There are reasons. But I ain't tellin'. There's no need.
From: Michael A. Terrell on 6 May 2010 19:32 Otto Bahn wrote: > > "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote > > >> >> I think someone (at least one) misunderstood. I don't think they were > >> >> criticizing you, rather elaborating or even having some fun. At least > >> >> it > >> >> started out that way. ...or maybe *I* missed it. ;-) > >> >> > >> >> In any case, the Usenet is a wild place. If you can't take the > >> >> criticism, get > >> >> out of the kitchen. ;-) > >> > > >> > > >> > Some people are born with no sense of humor. Others had it > >> >surgically removed. :( > >> > >> And some keep following shiny things back and forth through Usenet's > >> murky waters. > > > > Really? > > Really. The Ronco 875 popper, to be specific. I figured you would FINALLY get tired of diving for nickels in your septic tank. -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: Michael A. Terrell on 6 May 2010 19:35 barbara(a)bookpro.com wrote: > > On Thu, 06 May 2010 16:26:10 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell" > <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > >barbara(a)bookpro.com wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 05 May 2010 22:25:56 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell" > >> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >> > >> >"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I think someone (at least one) misunderstood. I don't think they were > >> >> criticizing you, rather elaborating or even having some fun. At least it > >> >> started out that way. ...or maybe *I* missed it. ;-) > >> >> > >> >> In any case, the Usenet is a wild place. If you can't take the criticism, get > >> >> out of the kitchen. ;-) > >> > > >> > > >> > Some people are born with no sense of humor. Others had it > >> >surgically removed. :( > >> > >> And some keep following shiny things back and forth through Usenet's > >> murky waters. > > > > > > Really? Then you should climb back on the short bus, and go back to > >the nut hatch. > > I see you're not as highly developed as youresteemed buddy who doesn't > call people jackasses. > > And as someone who continued to chase oTTo's lures for so long, you're > hardly an authority on things shiny. Like the top of your head? You really need to turn the shiny side of the foil in or you'll end up like the resident SED troll. As far as highly developed? You need to spell check before posting, if you expect people to think you made it out of third grade. -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: Michael A. Terrell on 6 May 2010 19:37
"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote: > > On Thu, 6 May 2010 10:13:45 -0400, "Otto Bahn" <Ladybrrane(a)GroinToHell.com> > wrote: > > >"Mark Edwards" <Mark-Edwards(a)comcast.net> wrote > > > >>>As originally designed, a score of 500 on a test section was the > >>>average, while each 100 above or below represented a standard > >>>deviation. > > > >That's just plain silly. There's only three standard deviations above > >average according to your logic...? > > We all know that logic isn't your strength. You needn't demonstrate your > single-digit IQ with every post. > > > >> While it may be true, I see no reason to call oTTo a deviant. Sheesh! > > > >There are reasons. But I ain't tellin'. > > There's no need. Where is dimbulb? We finally found his long lost sister. -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge. |